Ben Rowland wrote: Any gamer worth their salt knows the name Lara Croft, the iconic female protagonist in the classic Tomb Raider series that dates back to the mid-1990′s. Since it was first unveiled in early 2011, the “reboot” of the Tomb Raider series has been subject to extensive media coverage, mostly for the dark and gritty direction it has taken. Does this latest installment do justice to the rich history of the series? The answer, not surprisingly, is a resounding yes.
Tomb Raider I, II, III Remastered is available now on PC, Nintendo Switch, PlayStation 4 and 5, Xbox One, and Xbox Series X/S. Lara Croft is back in a classic remaster of the original PlayStation 1 hit title. Is the remaster any good though?
We've gone on many adventures with Lara Croft. With another reboot in the making, Wealth of Geeks felt it was a good time to go down the nostalgia rabbit hole and remember the best of those tomb-raiding thrills.
For me, Legend should be alot higher (along with the other two ). Shadow, I enjoyed it, but has too much has fluff, as modern games tend to do. Playing the remastered series, and apart from the controls, is very good.
I really enjoyed the first 2 games, Legend and the first of the reboots and the rest I didn’t get into so I never finished.
Completely subjective list. I really liked Underworld, I preferred Lara's design. That said I loved the horror/uncharted feel of the reboot. I think all the TR games have strengths and weaknesses. None are objectively better in every way.
Like the film or television industry, the world of gaming has seen its fair share of reboots over the years. While some of these video game reboots have had
I have yet to really dig into this game but it seems like a gem from all the reviews I've read so far.