There's nothing more frustrating than installing a much-anticipated game only to find out that there's absolutely no way it will play on your PC without a hardware upgrade. Nothing, that is, except finding that it does run, but only with framerates in single figures and all graphics settings set to low.
Do you soldier on, knowing that you are in no way experiencing the developer's vision? Or do you regretfully put the disc to one side until you can afford a better PC? One thing's for sure: the minimum system specs on the boxes of games are a misleading, meaningless mess.
Remedy has made a couple of changes to its core management team with the goal to grow Alan Wake and Control into larger franchises.
Whether you're new to TopSpin, or just want a recap, here are 5 quick tips so that you can instantly dominate on the court.
From Abubakar Salim and Surgent Studios comes the opportunity to wield the dance of the shaman in Tales of Kenzera: ZAU.
Yeah minimum specs are always bull. They should rate minimum as running on medium settings at average 30fps.
I always consider the recommended specs to be the minimum specs.
The "real" mininum specs are a joke.
consoles offer the best bang for the buck....
Always consider the price-performance margin