Submitted by Speed-Racer 992d ago | news

SimCity possibly one of the worst rated Amazon products in history

After a very sloppy launch, SimCity is on the road to becoming one of the worst rated products in Amazon’s online shopping database history. (PC, SimCity)

RonyDean  +   992d ago
Wow that is really stupid... the game is wonderful! Well if you can get into a server...
Speed-Racer  +   992d ago
I'm glad I waited. EA's history sucks wrt things like this. Surprised they haven't learned anything yet.
aiBreeze  +   992d ago
Yeah, basically the thing EA added to the game to ensure maximum profit has in actual fact had the exact opposite effect and probably cost them a lot more money than they realize. Irony personified.
#1.1.1 (Edited 992d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(0) | Report
rainslacker  +   992d ago

If it staves off future use of these DRM methods then I say it's good. It sucks it had to be in what was likely my most wanted title of all time(huge fan of the series), but there are times when the industry needs serious doses of medicine to bring it back into reality.

Sadly, after the whole Diablo III debacle didn't change much, this likely won't either. They'll get it sorted out, and things will return to normal, and as consumers we'll continue to be the lowest rung on the ladder.
DonteDemonSlayer  +   992d ago
It's quite funny to see it have a one of five stars, which I have never seen for any game before. Not because of the quality of the game, but because of the unbelievable single player DRM in which they can't even play the game they purchased. I believe the best part of it all is Amazon is no longer selling it, which is part of their firm belief of making customers happy, even at the cost of easy money. They will of course add it back once EA has stable servers, and can assure that there will be no more major problems.
aliengmr  +   992d ago
How is it stupid if someone has trouble playing the game?

Seems to me, a "wonderful" SP game is one that can be played at will and not dependent on EA pulling its head out of its ass.
SilentNegotiator  +   992d ago
Any game that won't actually play half of the time is a bad game.
#1.4 (Edited 992d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
Speed-Racer  +   992d ago
I'm pretty sure EA has space monkeys running their servers. Didn't they see this being a potential problem?!
mcroddi  +   992d ago
The launch has been a disaster.
RonyDean  +   992d ago
It really has been. Sucks...
brandonw00  +   992d ago
It is too bad because I was able to play for a while last night and it is a great game. Too bad it is plagued by terrible servers.
Speed-Racer  +   992d ago
So sad. I'll give them some time to sort it out before I shell out some bucks.
ThreshStar  +   992d ago
This is an unmitigated disaster in every facet - developers, EA, Public Relations, advertising, revenue, possible future earnings...even friends of mine who have NO interest in video games know about this debacle.

You have to wonder: How in the #@&#!& did EA and Maxis not prepare for this? How does a multi-BILLION dollar organization not have SOME type of disaster plan in effect for this sort of problem?

If EA is capable of this, makes me wonder about Activision, UBIsoft, Rockstar, etc. Is this the potential future of gaming?
rainslacker  +   992d ago
Activision had it to a lesser extent with Diablo III.

Ubisoft has actually relaxed their DRM practices because according to them it just doesn't work, and only hurts the people that buy the games.

Rockstar...I kind of consider them the Valve of consoles...they make quality products, and tend to let their games speak for themselves over going all anti-consumer...quite frankly they are one of the few that do it right IMO.

Smaller devs will probably never go this route as they don't need to sell millions of copies because their budgets are smaller.

Nintendo doesn't really seem to care about this kind of stuff as their 1st party games sell well.

MS, can't really say, only have rumors to go off of.

Sony...again hard to say. I would hope not, they took a while just to get to online passes, and I'd imagine they're content with that...or at least I hope they are.

I think with this EA probably knew they'd have issues, as hell it was pretty common sense among gamers that this type of DRM always has problems on day one. I just don't think they expected it to be as big as it was. Maybe they were just too over-confident in their online infrastructure, or they thought the issues wouldn't become so pronounced that it would become a PR nightmare.
Sarobi  +   992d ago
I want to buy this game because it seems fun, yet I'm iffy on it. Beside the issue with DRM.. is it fun?
Speed-Racer  +   992d ago
It is actually. No sarcasm btw.
2pacalypsenow  +   992d ago
I cant believe EA used this excuse.

"Server capacity is our biggest obstacle. We launched in North America on Tuesday and our servers filled up within a matter of hours. What we saw was that players were having such a good time they didn't want to leave the game, which kept our servers packed and made it difficult for new players to join.

rainslacker  +   992d ago
I have to admit...it's damn impressive spin, just not really appropriate to the situation.

Any Sim's based game is a game that people play for hours and hours on end...so if this is really true then it makes me wonder why they thought this one would be any different.

In the end though, stating how fun the game is is just a slap in the face to the people that supported it but can't play it due to EA's incompetence in the matter.
Psychotica  +   992d ago
It's amazing how unprepared they were for the volume of traffic on their servers.
aiBreeze  +   992d ago
Good job EA, you earned it.
Hazmat13  +   992d ago
i love simcity back in elementary in "computer lab" they gave us a collection of games to play everyone always went for simcity2000. but with all the online only crappy servers its a shame. odds are i will get but only when the game is actually up and running.
TheoreticalParticle  +   992d ago
"Possibly one of the worst rated".

Way to go out on a limb there, guys.
TacoTaru  +   992d ago
As much as I dislike them, I'd love to see a class action suit here with penalties big enough that they would never ever do such a thing again.
BLAKHOODe  +   992d ago
EA will fix the issues and then relaunch the game as a "special edition". Easy fix and the sheep will follow.
rainslacker  +   992d ago
Square is doing that with FFXIV-A Realm Reborn. Although I don't think that was server issues that caused that, just a hastily released product.

However, I bet EA would actually have the gall to charge people for that special edition, whereas square is giving it away to first adopters.
kobonline  +   992d ago
F*CK EA, & F*CK any Sim City Game after Sim City 4.

That is all.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
New stories

Assassin’s Creed Syndicate PC Review - CramG

38m ago - A review looking at the performance of the recently released Assassin's Creed Syndicate PC version. | PC

New Total War: Warhammer Trailer Reveals the Campaign Map for the First Time

38m ago - Today Sega and The Creative Assembly released a new trailer of Total War: Warhammer, focusing on... | PC

PS4 Games To Look Out For In November 2015

Now - With all the amazing titles still to come this year, Releases.com thought it would do you a favor and make it a little bit easier to keep track of... | Promoted post

PS4 Tabletop Game Tharsis to Release January 12, 2016

38m ago - PC/PS4 exclusive Tharsis by Choice Provisions is set to release January 12, 2016 on PlayStation 4... | PC

Assassin's Creed: Syndicate available for just $26.59 / £17.09

39m ago - NSG: It’s times like this when I think I really need to sort myself out with a gaming PC. This is... | PC

Metro - Bloodborne: The Old Hunters DLC review – game of the year

40m ago - Metro: There’s still a few notable games to be released early next month, including Just Cause 3... | PS4