Crytek's Crysis 3 is one of the most technically accomplished games of this generation, a visually spectacular piece of software that pushes graphical boundaries on all platforms. And with all its graphical settings pushed to the max, Crysis 3 on PC effectively offers a "next-gen now" experience - a preview of the level of technical prowess we should expect in the years to come from the new wave of consoles, but an experience that can be appreciated now by those willing to invest in top-end PC components.
100°
150°
60°
700°
Ad 
40°
10°
10°
10°
0°
30°
I have never seen such extreme fidelity in a video game. I believe Crytek were correct in saying it'll fit in with early next-gen only titles.
http://i2.minus.com/iHY2KK8...
http://www.abload.de/img/ce...
The above looks like concept art, yet it is fully in-game.
My rig is too old and crappy to even hope of rendering this game on low settings... But those Youtube videos are insane!
Not bad looking at all on console either.
I can nearly max the game out, and it still looks better than the maxed out videos on youtube.
The game itself on the other hand is around a 7 for me.
I am running everything on High and I run anywhere from 30-60+ frames a second depending on what is going on.
"Our Core i5 and Radeon 7870 combo barely managed a sustained 20FPS when running in 1080p with maximum settings enabled - and 720p fared little better."
PS4's GPU is between a 7850 and 7870, and the CPU is 8 mobile Jaguar cores. Doing the math will turn that smile upside down in no time.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum...
Looking at these pictures I'm inclined to say PC>X360>PS3.
With all the *impressive* stuff they do as a company one would think they would at least be capable to do a better or closer job.
No offense to anyone, just I find Crytek full of bs all around.
PS3 is inferior just like all Sony consoles. They know how to program for PS3 LMAO. PS3 exclusives are linear, static, QTE style games with tacked on social design if any at all with less features.
Sony making such simple games that are less resource hungry allows them to put a nice coat of paint on almost all of their games.
Bigger more complex games with heavy feature sets/game modes/social modes open and or not completely linear with good to stellar graphics suffer on PS3.
Can't wait for 720 and the Crytek exclusives on it. Crytek no doubt has pushed MSFT on the design of the 720 while they have been working with MSFT for the last few years. Powerful 8 core CPU http://www.vgleaks.com/dura...
Haters don't like Crytek because they released Crysis 2 on consoles which showed the BS claims that PS3 games were the best looking. When a Multi platform game looked the best on consoles they had a meltdown and it got worse as people started to learn the 360 version was superior.
- Sony bad LOL!
- Microsoft (sorry, MSFT) great!
Might want to save yourself some time in future and just copy and paste that.
This comment alone shows how much of a complete and utter deluded troll you are.
How are the likes of Uncharted, or God of War, Killzone, Heavy Rain, etc any "simpler" than the games that get released on the xbox.
Go on please educate me. Oh wait, you cant because youve only got one bubble. Because you're a troll.
I didn't see any jaggies when running on High settings in 1080p.
But I still think it has the best grass around lol.
All ya gotta do is wait for a mod and problem fixed.
Anyway, it wasn't a big deal to me.
They did add, however, really nice effects when walking through grass and bushes though. When Psycho was walking in front of me, the bushes were parting around him and that was pretty nice.
the game is open like the first runs and looks better than crysis 2. Never felt so good stalking prey with a bow. Story is better as is the online.
Only a few haters gonna be mad
Edit: who mad? why you disagree =) lol
Related video
but in consoles its completely another thing:A CAN OF GARBAGE
Lol You reach so high' yet fall so hard. Its a shame consumers like you exist give Microsoft a pass for shoving line ct shovelers all down your throat and sticking you with a halo, gran turismo and gears cycle that leaves much to be wanting.
One thing is clear you have the fact that ps3 and ps4 games intimidate you. You wish Microsoft made better decisions and more IPS like Sony. Instead of lying on here why don't you fight back with your wallet? While you look forward to Dance central crap on line ct 2.0 that we all know micro is focusing on I'll be playing another benchmark game on my ps4 In kill zone. Sony not only has fun games but the best looking as said not by lame fanboys like you but professionals.
I know you were one of those lames hyping up cry sis 2 because you needed a game on Xbox to look better than a ps3 game but what happened? Cry sis 2 fell short and not only did killzone 3 look better but performed better (there goes your qte argument Lol). Cry sis 2 had crazy frame rate problems' minimal stupid al on screen and other issues and killzone 3 wiped the floor with it. Google is your best friend and digital foundry report is your worst nightmare Lol. Now play along child we all know your butthurt pd4 looks awesome and are on here lying. Till this day no Xbox games best the best looking ps3 games whether its a shooter or not. Cry sis 3 actually looks worse than 2 so I don't know what the hoopla is about and kz3 still looks better