Player Effort reviews Metal Gear Rising: Revengeance. Can it live up to the prestigious quality of the MGS franchise?
Kinda dumb to put it in comparison to the MGS franchise...That was kind of the whole point of them taking the "Solid" out of the title. If you're looking for a tactical espionage game, you shouldn't be playing Metal Gear Rising honestly.
I never compare the game play between the two games
The second sentence of your review: "can it live up to the prestigious quality of the MGS franchise?" That's comparing it to the other franchise, which he pointed out, but you're denying it here.
That is totally different. I'm not comparing the game play here, just the quality that is expected from Metal Gear games.
WHY would anyone compare the QUALITY of both games using MGS as a frame of reference? Theyre not made by the same people, it needs to be judged on its own merits and as its OWN game. Just cause it's a spin-off of a character from the Metal Gear series deosnt mean it's supposed to be the same type of game. If the game was just called "Raiden" people would STILL say "OHH, it's a Metal Gear game but it's not as good as Metal gear! BOO!"
Best thing to do here is: 1. Story quality? Crap. 2. Like this website? lol which website? No, anyways. 3. Don't give the bait review a hit. =)
Taking "Solid" out of the title as an excuse not to compare games is stupid. If anything they should've taken out "Metal Gear" from the game as well cause even Metal Gear Ac!d had better stealth (and a better story). If they took "Solid" out of the title then why does this garbage still take a crap all over the MGS canon?
Don't you have anything better to do?
Sooo, you call this game garbage and say it takes a crap all over MGS canon, yet have the new Dante has your avatar? lmao riiight. As I stated before, the game isn't a stealth game...so what's your point in saying Ac!d has better stealth? Rising is a pure over the top action game. And the game takes place some time after the events of MGS4 anyway, the canon of MGS isn't really touched there.
This games awesome!
Yea. It shocks me how some people don't like it . At least if you don't like it give it what it deserve. It's like giving Gt5 5/10 just because i don't like cars..
I do like the game, but when critiquing it I need be tougher on it.
Isn't the gameplay and the story good ?. Why rate it under 8 when it's clearly a good game? The only thing i can agree with you is the graphics and the camera which doesn't effect the game that much to rate it really down. You have to consider 60fps and cutting everything to judge the graphics. They could have made it look better but they prefer to make the game run better and smoother and that's a sacrafice they had to made because of the limitation of current generation. You already saw the early version and how it looked but it played slower.. You are too harsh on this game.. But i like how you respond to people here to say your opinion ..
I gave the game an 8.5 and that was being fair.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.