inFamous: Second Son takes place 7 years after the “Cole McGrath episodes” and stars newcomer Delsin Rowe as he tries to evade the DUP in Seattle. That much we know. -PSLS
Good on the powers, not sure if I'd like the game if all I could do was turn into smoke.
They made a game about electricity awesome. I'm sure they could do the same to smoke as well.
Teleporting is going to be incredible. http://i.minus.com/ixXaiHKS... http://i.minus.com/ipgF1fUy... http://i.minus.com/iblEg8wY...
Well, you can't have smoke without fire...
im pretty sure they can, just look at smoke from mortal kombat, he can teleport, cook you from the inside out,shake your molecules,throw smoke bombs,etc...
Sucker Punch haven't made a bad game yet. Period. They are developing a Naughty Dog lite reputation. I know this game will be great but I need a new series to see if they have that ND touch. This will be fantastic. They are good controls nice feel type devs from the old school in new high poly trappings. They are great.
With all that ram to work with think about the potential of their open world games! second son will rock.
I personally think inFamous is a better franchise than the Uncharted games. But I'm also a huge fan of open world games.
ND had to make a showcase for the PS3 for the Cell just like Crash was for the PS1. We will get the next gen new era stuff from Naughty Dog. I have to agree though as a game I prefer Infamous to most any first party games last gen especially the first one.
Smoker from One Piece has smoke powers...and he's a badass! http://i-moc.com/one-piece-...
Shame about cole though.. Nevertheless, they could create a character just as Iconic..
Was the trailer in game graphics? I know I'm so exited about this game I can't stand it! Damn E3 hurry up. I must see more!
im definately sure is it ! at times you could see the poly on the helmets and stuff , and it looks like its on an improved infamous engine
Wasn't a fan of the new Cole anyway, so I'm fine with this.
What new Cole? It was the same guy in inFamous 1 and 2. Only the voice actor changed.
The new voice actor did take some time for me to get used to, but he was good overall.
He had 2% more facial hair in InFamous 2. This guy mustn't like stubble..
But why get rid of Cole I understand if they want to look at other characters, honestly I really wanted to see this I just didn't want the universe they created move forward without Cole They could of done spin off games with alternative timelines, since time travel is possible in inFAMOUS. They could of done prequels about Kesler moving up the ranks of the first sons and finally taken control of the group or show you Coles/Keslers life in the alternative timeline before the beast attacked. They could of done a game on a conduit while the events of inFAMOUS 2 play out They could of showed us a game based on Nix or maybe another conduit where Kuo is the secondary character when she's still human and acts like what Zeke does to Cole in the first two games. His friend and advisor I could go but you get my point...there was absolutely no need to set the game after inFAMOUS 2 and continue without Cole. Cole is a well loved character and should of been the main character for the main games. However since they've not numbered this game and given it a subtitle there's still hope that inFAMOUS 3 is being saved for Cole. Who knows the twist at the end of this game might be that this is an alternative universe back in Keslers/Future Coles timelime or a universe where neither the good or bad ending happened in the last game....Cole just defeated the Beast without activating the ray sphere and without becoming the beast himself I just hate it when they do new characters when there's still a lot more they could do to the old one. I mean Coles only been in two games...at least do a trilogy with him before you want to move on. Also...I'm not really liking the new character. You know first impressions and all, it's just his design, it's so ugly. Don't get me started on his attitude. "As Sucker Punch is based right outside of Seattle, and many of us have lived there our entire lives, we wanted to pay homage to our hometown and backyard. " Personal reasons much...why not just call it "Seeatle", play on it's words. It's still similar to the real name. I find it funny they keep dodging the "What ending does it go off" question because neither ending doesn't make sense. Humans are still alive so it's not the evil ending but conduits are still around so much they created advanced tec to keep a look at for them so it's not the good ending where they are wiped out. If they came out and said "InFAMOUS 3 is being kept because it's Coles story and we might do a new game" or "Second Sons is not inFAMOUS 3 but more of a spin off" then fair enough I wouldn't have a problem. I just don't know why they would get rid of a character they know people love a ton. Look at the backlash when they changed his character design.
Coles an early 30s cocky white guy with super powers. He's VERY interchangeable. Infamous 2 ended Cole's story properly, so I don't see what the point of bringing him back is.
As I was saying in another comment What about if he revived but only after a seven year gap, facing a changed world where his kind are captured and possibly killed to try and "keep the peace". After they see Cole they want to kill him knowing who he is, "the demon of empire city" and decide to get rid of him thinking has some connection to the Beast despite defeating him and being the worlds savior. The above is an example but there are always ways in stories to give new meanings to old characters. You just got to think of a good way to do it. Besides I wouldn't really say Cole was cocky...he didn't really want his powers at the start of inFAMOUS. If they didn't add the question mark lightning bolt then fine...his story was over but the fact they did just makes things worse. They teased us that he would return and instead of doing that they are replacing him with a new character which looks worse then him As I've said Cole is a much loved character, the least they could of done before these subtitled spin offs is give him a proper trilogy of games to look back on. People really liked Cole, he was a good character
You might get your wish on the Vita. Maybe even the PS3. If you want to play as Cole again, all hope isn't lost :)
@Root *Sigh* It's time to let go as we did (!!!SPOILERS!!) at the good ending of Infamous 2. Sucker Punch said he's not coming back. Besides it's time to move on anyway and look on to the Future of Delsin Rowe.
"we" Who is "we"...you mean you. I didn't know you spoke for everyone If you look on the forums theres a lot of people who don't see the point of Cole not coming back. I'm not like the only one
i think he means "we" as much as "you" in your other comment meant "we" when you speak about others wanting cole back, only its just the opposite its pretty clear you like the character so i understand for that reason you want him back. however we will just have to accept the choices the developer wants to pursue with the game it isnt numbered after all so there is some kind of hope but reading the information its somewhat unlikely for his return base on thier decisions but hey its true untill proven otherwise
I don't mean to speak for everyone but i'll say this yes that question mark at the good ending for Infamous 2 has gotten ones to speculate that maybe Cole may come back I even said this as well. But with all the conduits gone if Cole was to come back who would he fight? Also, I thought that a ray sphere was needed to activate the powers of those with the conduit gene and... ...yeah that's seems right you had to use ray sphere or any type of machine to activate those with conduit gene. Trying to figure all of this makes my brain hurt so it's best not to bring Cole back anyway. But maybe they'll have him and some new paper or something. It seems is what Sucker Punch want to do hence "7 years after the Cole incident". I look at your first comment as something that you hope will happen for Cole but honestly don't see it happening. Like, you said they didn't call this infamous 3 because they'll probably make that later; I don't think they will do that. The way I see it SP is making a comic book of characters that all reside in the infamous series where something happens and they realize they have special abilities like Delsin Rowe and unlike the first two Infamous games, I also think that we won't be dealing with 'conduits' anymore but a new 'breed of superhuman'.
"speculate that maybe Cole may come back I even said this as well. But with all the conduits gone if Cole was to come back who would he fight?" Well it's pretty obvious here that conduits do come back in some form What about if someone started making conduits like how they made Kuo into one. They apparently replaced her blood with a blue liquid so it's pretty obvious they made someone into a conduit and give her powers why can't other groups do the same. You make it sound like the ending was a full stop and SuckerPunch isn't allowed to go further but it's their story they can make up any character or story arc they want for Cole to continue in With Superheros, especially in comics they always have an enemy to fight, hell how many superheros have you thought was dead but they keep coming back over and over. So yeah new enemies can appear, they could range between government squads to get rid of the player or modified created conduits like what happened to Kuo. As I've said if they wanted to make a side game why not make it on the PSV or set it at the same time as inFAMOUS 2....why set it after inFAMOUS 2 that should be left for inFAMOUS 3 when Cole does come back. They will bring him back, people love him too much
@Root if you followed the game Kuo says she was a conduit it was towards the beginning of the game where she explains it at 7:42 And perhaps Sucker Punch may continue the story it just it looked like the ideas people were coming up with seem illogical.
Continuing with Cole would mean making two separate games. You can't alienate a side of the good/evil spectrum of users by picking a "real" ending and forming a game off of it. They are going to form a plausible backstory for this new guy, and its nice to see a change. I love that both Killzone and InFamous are starting with new characters and settings. Nice way to usher in the PS4 era
They used the good ending in inFAMOUS, not as big as the second games since there wasn't much difference between the two but they still made the good one canon. So they would of went with the good ending in this What about if they made two third games with subtitles. Good game you play Cole and in the Evil one you play as Kuo who decides Cole has went too far and his new powers are going to his head. Then least then they've got two universes to work with for side games and spin offs
U can do that in just one single game, starting at two different points, would be even better cuz it would make it longer and would bring more tweaks to the story, depending on wich side u chose to start.
Maybe he will come back in a further installment. Infamous 2 did ended with a question mark so the possibility of him coming back in another game is possible.
I can appreciate your love for the Infamous series and Cole's story, but I think it was inevitable that the series would move on to a different character in a world full of other potential playable characters. Any more added powers and Cole would have become Dr. Manhattan. There's no reason why some of the conduits couldn't have survived as a twist. Perhaps powers dormant for years after the event. It's very comic book centric, the inFamous series, and that's a fair twist if you ask me. It's no "Superman is dead!!!....nevermind" twist.
"But why get rid of Cole" so non-gamers like yourself won't have the chance to whine about how this cole is different from the "old" cole. They also bypass all the whine from folks like you when they decide to change or try something new. Sorry you won't get the chance to complain that Infamous3 is "nothing like the others!" they're casualizing the game or whatever whiny crap you peubs were bound to say when this plays differently than the last 2.