Submitted by PsyphonD 580d ago | news

Crysis 3’s graphics only 5 to 10% better on consoles, says Crytek CEO Cevat Yerli

Crytek CEO Cevat Yerli said that Crysis 3 on the Xbox 360 and PS3 will naturally look better than Crysis 2, but graphically-speaking, it could only gain a five to 10 percent improvement on consoles. (Cevat Yerli, Crysis 3, PS3, Xbox 360)

« 1 2 »
yewles1  +   580d ago
After ALL that marketing BS from before...

PockyKing  +   580d ago
Don't judge it till you play it, this game looks freaking great on consoles.
blitz0623  +   580d ago
Does Crytek talk about anything else other than graphics?
yesmynameissumo  +   580d ago
You know they're trying to sell an engine too. He has to talk up the graphics. Just let the screens speak for themselves at this point. He'll do the same shit with Homefront too.
deadfrag  +   580d ago
Runs like crap,most of the time below 30fps,how the fuck is this playble!Some of you kids that never own a pc and dont know the diference between smooth play at 30fps atleast or super smooth 60fps and above are going indeed to take and feel a big diference when next generation consoles arrive,and actually deliver the minimum of 30fps+ during the entire gameplay that indures a game!It just sad when i see reviewers giving 8 and 9 to games that run like crap,and theres not even a mention or diference in scores between what runs like crap and what run like it should be its like the plate is always the same ,but thats not true;is just another way of miss information to consumers,and a lot of cash flowing in the back!Im not talking just about Crysis in talking gaming in general and between all the existing platforms.I already played Crysis 3 on PC and consoles and for me its not a good game in neither the platforms,because the fundamental piece that is the gameplay is boring.
#1.1.3 (Edited 580d ago ) | Agree(15) | Disagree(13) | Report
Godmars290  +   580d ago
But they're not talking about gameplay are they? No, they're talking about the only thing they've talked about since trying to whore the Crysis engine out to other devs like Epic does with UE: graphics!
josephayal  +   580d ago
I totally agree with you, every Crysis game has looked absolutely stunning and has set the bar for what games can look like, consoles and Pc (soon vita)
DeadlyFire  +   580d ago
Why would they blitz0623? They sell game engine licenses for Cryengine. They market that until they die. Its just like how Cliff did with Gears of war. Like OMGOMG its AWESOMEST Thing ever! was all he ever said about the game to promote the UE3 license selling. :P
Septic  +   580d ago

What are you on about? Gears was brilliant and the results itself were a testament to the power of the Unreal Engine. Basically, Cliffy let his game do the talking.
Campy da Camper  +   579d ago
Er, not on my ps3. Jaggies and very low res foliage. Was not impressed. That's not even taking into account the BORING game play. The AI is retarded. They're canned sayings eminded me of 'who's footprints are these?!?!' Over and over and over...
#1.1.8 (Edited 579d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(2) | Report
ratcop22  +   579d ago
Yes but games such as Tlou will blow it outta here!
pixelsword  +   579d ago
It looks pretty good on consoles, but it still ain't touching Killzone 3; or even 2 for that matter.

The game-play is pretty solid, unlike the last two, so you can't lose in that regard (at least for Hunter mode in multiplayer), but if you're a graphics whore the PC is the way to go on this one if you can afford to up the specs because Crytek can't up the specs on consoles and like most PC devs have yet to learn the words "optimize" and "game-play".
#1.1.10 (Edited 579d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(1) | Report
reynod  +   579d ago
"like most PC devs have yet to learn the words "optimize" and "game-play"."

If by optimize you mean reducing texture quality, AA, AF, making the game linear enough to the point where it becomes a corridor shooter then really there is no need of that sort of optimization. Thats mostly the kind of optimization that goes into console games.

People keep crying about Crysis 1 being unoptimized, when the bare truth is Crysis 1 was rendering so much stuff at once it pretty much killed any hardware thrown at it.
Megaton  +   580d ago
Trusting anything said by anyone associated in any way with EA was your first mistake.
yewles1  +   580d ago
"Trusting anything said by anyone associated in any way with EA was your first mistake."

How does holding on to quotes from HISTORICAL flip-flop'ers equate to to ANYTHING other than calling them out on BS AGAIN???

pixelsword  +   579d ago
Although not trusting EZ (lol) is now becoming the standard norm, I do agree with yewles1 in that you have to keep on people who talk-up a bunch of bull. Epic did the same thing with their engine but it never actually got any game to look as good as the demos it produced.

(Yes a company is an "it", it's not a "them".

You can fire all of "them" in a company that made the company great, and hire a bunch of incompetent people and what made "it" good is gone. "It" still exists, even though "it" is not as good as "it" once was and those who left are no longer a part of "it").

I gotta stop drinking so much caffeine...
#1.2.2 (Edited 579d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report
Persistantthug  +   580d ago
Crysis 3 is sub HD on consoles just as Crysis 2 was.
There are better looking and more technically advanced games than Crytek's games.

The fact is, for consoles, Crytek isn't really all that good.

Personally, I also find their games boring, but that's for a whole different topic I suppose.
#1.3 (Edited 580d ago ) | Agree(12) | Disagree(9) | Report | Reply
N0S3LFESTEEM  +   580d ago
Crysis is a boring eyegasm.
meetajhu  +   580d ago
I hate Crytek's implementation to increase graphics quality while demanding newer hardware. They always tend to add more particle effects and shadows on more objects which is completely unnecessary unless we are going for tour view in the game. They need to make a optimized engine like Alan wake running PC.
Walker  +   580d ago
U mad cevat ?
piroh  +   580d ago
he mad because UE will stay mainstream graphics engine for 3rd party devs even after this foolish marketing tactics. he will never admit defeat, just ignore him
tbirdman   580d ago | Spam
Canary  +   580d ago
Because "graphics" are even easier to quantify than they are to define.
bunfighterii  +   580d ago
Crysis 2 was an overrated game with decent graphics and not much else to set it apart. Crysis 3 looks like virtually the same game with a couple new weapons.

In all probably not worth the attention it gets.
DrVosknocker  +   580d ago
#6 (Edited 580d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
NastyLeftHook0  +   580d ago
quit trolling crytek
KwietStorm  +   580d ago
If I never hear another word about gfx from Crytek...
wenaldy  +   580d ago
STFU Yerli!!!
floetry101  +   580d ago
Yerli's problem is that he only ever talks about the goddamn visuals. I loved Crysis and Warhead too, but the dude has to realise that he's digging bigger holes when he boasts ONLY about the tech and never the actual content of the game.
CaptainPunch  +   580d ago
All I hear from Crytek is about graphics -_-
TemplarDante  +   580d ago
and Gameplay, Yerli? Is it also a 10% improvment? Or is it still boring as hell?
Mogwai  +   580d ago
I for one am really turned off by their attitude, like the know it all big noter at school you just rolled your eyes at and avoided like the plague. They can rant and rave about graphics but bioshock infinite will show these boys what it means to be truly inspired. Crysis 3? Nope!
talisker  +   580d ago
This guy is an idiot. I can say that with full responsibility. He's telling people NOT to buy things he sells.
skyrimer  +   580d ago
The day he says something about gameplay will be a breakthrough
lovegames718  +   580d ago
Some of the ppl on here just lie to lie. Was in, beta and the mp asoect of this game took a big graphical downgrade compared to crysis 2.
lovegames718  +   580d ago
Stop lying Sony never said it wasnt, going to be, more powerfull then wiiu to the contrary Jack Trenton said it was, going to be a noticeable difference. Stop spewing tht bs ive seen you say it a few times and your lying. Be happy with your current gen wiiu the, teal nxt gen starts tomorrow. Make sure you have tissues for you and your possess theres going to be alot of crying.
Chucky2003  +   580d ago
for a 5 hour game,my PC wouldn't even have time to be "melted" by this game
#18 (Edited 580d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
Dfooster  +   580d ago
I remember crysis 2 looking great when I bought it, shame i can't remember anything else about that game though.
ironmonkey  +   580d ago
stick to console the pc version cant even max crysis for most people right now. i have a gtx 670 intel i5 3570k and 8 gigs of ram and cant even touch max without its frame dipping down to an unstable 20 frames. who plays like that. but i do get 60 frames when i drop all the settings down to low but then theres no purpose of having expensive hardware.
Jdoki  +   580d ago
These guys talk about graphics a LOT... it's almost as if they forget they need to make a decent game to go with the visuals.

If ever a company was living off past glories, it's Crytek.
Perjoss  +   580d ago
I tried to play a big of Crysis 1 the other night, yes it is still a fantastic looking game but I totally forgot just how boring the combat is. All the suit stuff is just gimmicky, stealth mode runs out way too fast if you try to move at a decent pace and the armor mode also runs out way too fast.

The weapon you start out with is pretty cool but you run out of ammo for that pretty fast and end up playing 90% of the game with one of those enemy AK type things.

Its a real shame because the graphics, lighting and environments are breathtaking at times.
stone_cold  +   580d ago
it looks epic on consoles
Tyre  +   579d ago
It definitely does! The people making the cynical remarks have never f'ing played ANY Crysis game! People in here hating Crytek goes beyond sanity...u guys are so easily fooled by the repeat of the same articles about misquotes from the same f'ing interviews made weeks ago. The interaction between posters of pathetic flamebait articles & reactions by moronic & immature gamers is a site to behold. It is a typical mental state of decay displayed here, or is it just the mentality to act like y'all are better at making games than the developers themselves? What is wrong with u people? This game & Developers deserve praise. Crysis 3 is f'ing amazing on consoles and the gameplay is what u make it urself....it is one of the few FPS games that actually let combine and make stuff up...replay value like a motherf. Guess that's why people didn't like Mirror's Edge either, like Crysis u could make stuff up and make ur own climbing route...it also didn't patronise gamers and had a special learning curve... the people who say it's boring lack intiative & imagination or they are just boring themselves or lack the intelligence to comprehend this type of fresh gameplay.
Campy da Camper  +   579d ago
Lol. Son, take some more Ritilan. I've been gaming since the 80s and played all sorts of different games. I can recognize a good game when I see it. Portal, half life, super Mario, medevil, final fantasy 7, soul reaver, splinter cell 12&3, metal gear, journey you name it I've played it and crysis does not come close to any of these awesome Gamez. Tech demo only.
wiium64  +   580d ago
ps3 is not more powerful than wii u, just ask need for speed, the graphics are pc textures ps3 does not have the capability to do computer textures wii u does, thus wii u is more powerful than ps3, nintendo haters just can't deal with reality, how sad.
GearSkiN  +   580d ago
nah ur wrong
MysticStrummer  +   579d ago
WiiU has less of a graphical advantage over PS3 than Crysis 3 has over Crysis 2 on consoles. Welcome to the current gen. Next gen will be revealed later today.
hiredhelp  +   580d ago
Seriously guys dont go by cevat yeli. Hes a CEO NOT A DEV hes been running his mouth doing PR work in my oppinion from a crytek fan a blatant pain in the backside needs to close his trap let the devs that work and know how to code design and port games talk.
So please make your own choice about the game when its out.
TemplarDante  +   580d ago
He isnt a dev, he isnt a CEO either. He is a joke.
They WILL port every game to next gen unoptimized and inefficient and scream "we hav MaxEd teh consolz likez two yars ago!!, more powar !!!"
And then... 1st party devs for Sony and Microsoft release games that blow Crysis to hell.
Crysis 2 and 3 are NOT open world, Its a smoke and mirrors corridor game.
#24.1 (Edited 580d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
GearSkiN  +   580d ago
console campaign has some serious audio problems.
kevnb  +   580d ago
Pretty soon they will move to the booming free to play PC market.
TemplarDante  +   580d ago
PS, If the game shipped broken, you WILL NOT get support for patches.
The mods abandoned Crysis 2 and 3 will be the same. You have a better chance of getting blood out of a stone than a patch that fixes this broken $60 turd.
hiredhelp  +   580d ago
@TemplarDante mods havent abandoned crysis 2

chukamachine  +   580d ago

The wii u is next gen for Nintendo owners. fixed.
pennywhyz  +   580d ago
It does look great on consoles by its fukin eye poppin on PC.Ya have to see them in motion.
IK IR Y IP T  +   580d ago
I love all the hate these kids on this site have for crytek ? Let playstation talk about killzone and thats all u hear is graphics and they game is complete and utter garbage. Re-guardless, it all boils down to is, thousands of people like myself enjoy the crysis franchise and are playing the multiplayer as we speak so if u hate the game so much just stay away from the articles and go troll somewhere else. Crytek is a well respected comp that hired 75% of vigil after thq ruined hundreds of lives give them the benefit of the doubt i dont see other companys stepping in. Alot of little boys on this website are just made they cant afford all the good games so there opinions are easily swayed dont judge games unless u have played them period ...
tachy0n  +   579d ago
faith in humanity +1

why? because finally i found a comment that is not coming from another playstation sheep in N4G.

"dont judge games unless u have played them period"

you are right man! ^

everybody praised uncharted a lot here on N4G, which inspired me to check it out by myself, i played a bit of each uncharted, it was boring as hell including the PSVita version.

Crytek does the tech demos to show what their engine is capable of, while most just talk BS....
greenpowerz  +   579d ago
It looks better than Killzone hence the hate/hypocrisy
« 1 2 »

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
New stories

Bladestorm: Nightmare announced for Q1 2015

7m ago - Bladestorm: Nightmare has just been announced by KOEI. The game is a sequel to Bladestorm: the Hu... | PS3

Toukiden Kiwami Confirmed For The West, Launching During 2015 On PlayStation Vita

7m ago - Toukiden Kiwami is going to be released in North America and Europe sometime during 2015, Koei Te... | PS Vita

Xbox One hits stores in 5 Asian regions today

7m ago - India, Singapore, Hong Kong, Korea, and Taiwan all got their hands on the Xbox One. | Xbox One

Age Of Wonders III: Golden Realms Review | Attack On Gaming

21m ago - "Age Of Wonders III is the latest installment in the Age of Wonders series of turn-based strategy... | PC

Top Xbox One Exclusives to Look Forward To

Now - What are you excited for? Here are the ones we're really getting revved up for. | Promoted post

ZTGD | Disney Infinity: Marvel Super Heroes – 2.0 Edition (XB1) Review

21m ago - Ken McKown writes: Disney Infinity is a series that should be awesome. A virtual toy box of belov... | Xbox One
Related content from friends