While the Internet at large still waits for Randy Pitchford -- or anybody -- from Gearbox to come clean and explain what went wrong with Aliens: Colonial Marines, the studio CEO has decided his best course of action is to display contempt for those who felt cheated when they bought his stinker.
Is he a good guy? I don't know. But his twitter is (currently) somewhat reasonable-sounding and I can't be offended by someone not wanting to hear criticisms that aren't new, just rude (and yes--I think that twitter users can be pretty offensive) any more than I can be offended by not wanting to argue with people whose political opinions I don't agree with. Even if I were a political consultant, I would think that I have every right to say "look, you have your opinion, but my opinion is that I don't want to hear it."
In short, not news.
It's about time that people realise he has always been like this & that Gearbox have always been a shit developer & no Borderlands is not an awesome game!
Feel how you're gonna feel about it, but don't play dumb, John Q Public.
Doesnt matter if others had their hands in it, they did personal interviews on the game, they had game trailers at their actual building in a video talking about it and had Alien figures everywhere, they seemed like they were personally going to change our view on the bad Alien games -
Then we got $hitted on
He set the Twitter up like most devs to get feedback from gamers, he probably set it up mostly for praise and didn't think about if anything like this happened but still it's happened now and he should look at what and his studio have done.
He deserves this for lying to us
Its fair to block out those people who are blatantly there to just insult. However, to disregard those asking significant questions... is another thing.
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
There are ways around it. Ways to still get the point across. It's not like someone needs to do this for every game, but the real stinkers. Or the ones that we are lied about.
When you think of it, what Gearbox did was tantamount to fraud. Don't know if it would hold up in court, but on a slightly lesser legal threshold it would be considered a slam dunk fraud. So the NDA forces people play along with that fraud. Great huh. Where accessory to fraud is legalized by NDA's. (and we wonder why we're in a great depression! Protip: Stuff like this and repeal and not reinstated Glass-Steagall)
He could have wrote a short article, or even just visited one of the pre-launch pages and said something to the effect...."Oh I just cancelled my pre-order for Aliens: Colonial Marines"
Nothing wrong with that. No NDA can stop that.
Hell you can even get your point across by saying, SWITCHING versions to the Wii U version...made by a different dev.
Or even made cryptic comments like
The canon was broken.
The canon fizzled when shot.
The aim wasn't right with the canon.
Or make comments about COMPETITORS. Like "I'm going to be playing lots of CoD this week despite A:CM launching"
Lots of ways around it that no NDA can touch. At least until we go 100 percent fascist.
So was looking for a b-day game, and Duke was coming out, so I got Duke.
Yep, videogame wise that b-day sucked.
I'll wait to see more about the Wii U version, do I cancel pre-order or get it? Well it depends on what I see between now and launch. If it sucks, preorder is gone. If not, I'll get it. But this is twice in the last 1 1/2 years Pitchford has screwed over fans of some major franchises.