DSOGaming writes: "Crysis 3 has been unlocked on various regions and PC gamers have already put Crytek’s latest FPS title to the test. YouTube’s member ‘ResetLoad’ has made a comparison between the various graphical preset options."
Christ, that still looks better than 95% of games of the last 2 years on low settings.
Still Crysis 3 better than all exclusives PS3 games in low specs =^^= Anyway, i can't wait for play this game.. looks better than Crysis 2 for sure.
lol KZ2 that game was a pile of mediocrity
Too bad it its not as good as any PS3 game or even the original crysis. This game is a fun tech demo but its still a good game but nothing special. Most PC gamers already dislike cryteck for crysis 2
@classic You haven't played the game, so don't be so quick do dismiss it as a tech demo. Every Crysis game so far has been stellar (yes, even though Crysis 2 was a bit of a departure from the first it was still, overall a very solid game). The third installment is shaping up quite well too, with more emphasis on what made Crysis 1 awesome (large, open-ended levels and dynamic gameplay). Stop talking out of your ass.
@Letros Killzone 2 was one of the best shooters this gen. Considering the critical and consumer reception, I would say there aren't many people who agree with you.
Another great graphic tech demo,but a piece of crap of a game in the gameplay department!
@ritsuka666 TROLOLOLOLLLOOOLOLOLOL much?
Only 2 years
All years :p
Minimum requirements are the 400 or equivalent series which wasn't even available till 2010 and yet console hardware from 2005 can run it just fine. Five years of advancement in PC tech only to be on par with consoles. Not exactly efficient. Maybe you should consider the implications of how that effects a standardized hardware format that could be unveiled any time now...
The PC version uses DX11, and DX11 cards have been around for 4 years, so the console versions are below PC low settings and are locked at 720p and 30 FPS. Running the game at 1080p already requires 2x more computation power than what consoles are capable of. I'm really not sure what exactly you're trying prove here besides your very limited knowledge of computer hardware.
@zoyos if you consider sub hd, covered in jaggies, screen tearing, low res textures and awful performance to be as you put it "console hardware from 2005 can run it just fine" i would not call that fine, i'd call that chocking on tech it cannot handle like nearly all console games from the last 5 years, resolutions are dipping lower and lower, anti aliasaing is almost never used, or its some awful blur filter after effect, performance is tanking the truth is, every major multiplat game on console is just the pc version at the LOWEST possible settings, with draw distance reduced, no anti aliasing, no dynamic shadows, no ssao, nothing
Definitely more polished looking than the Beta.
Your not proving your point well, as DX 10 and 11 features have been implemented on the DX9 cards on consoles. Lighting, motion blur, depth of feild, wet and refective serfaces, tesselation. Any reasonable 2005 pc wouldn't even run crysis 2 720p30fps even in DX9 mode, yet consoles can handle crysis 3 with DX 11 features. The only noticable difference you'll see is FPS and resolution and only if you have a GTX460 or higher card. And 2x the power is 18 months, not 5 years of technological development. Where does 3.5 years of progess go? Face the facts, this game would be a 5 min strees test for a bottom of the barrel 2009 DX 11 GPU in 1080p at anything above low. I'm not saying that the extra cash for a new card and 5 year wait is not worth it for some like yourself, but the only thing your proving is your resolve to ignore how extensive console coding optimization plays a role in their longevity and reasonable pricing per performance.
Zoyos leave the tech talk to the big boys. ok? So much misinformation in that post and flawed thinking that its pointless to even get into it.
you know that you can tesselate using a cell phone processor right? the difference is all of those features you just mentioned are Hardware accelerated, meaning that it was designed to run those effects and 100s of times faster using compute shader hardware tesselators, more rop's, for addressing higher resolutions, and upwards of 1000 cuda/stream cores to do it with. not to mention the raw clock speed advantage.
I dont get this guy. Hes moving and running around in all direction to compare graphics.. Why not stand still, and transit to the other settings..
@letros crisis is the definition of mediocrity. Graphics is all it has going for it. Ps3's worst game is better than all 3 crisis games combined. Pc nerds and their graphics lol
Woah, way to bring personal insults to the equation you stupid idiot.
Surely someone with that name and icon wouldn't be a bit biased...
The first Crysis has very fun gameplay. It isn't all about the graphics. Customize your gun in real time, awesome physics, grab people and use super strength to throw them far, etcetera. The 2nd wasn't terrible but it didn't feel that fun to me.
If gameplay matters, then why do you play a ps3 and not a Nintendo? Nintendo is by far the most creative and innovative company when it comes to gameplay.... PC has the eye candy and Nintendo has the gameplay. What is the reason people buy Playstations and XBox's?? console fangirls say its because the graphics are better.... Not from my vantage point.
Looks like DX11 has officially arrived. Dat low setting.
I don't know what half of those effects mean but it's a shame that crysis isn't an open world game like Gary cry other wise I'd be sold.
You shouldnt let that deter you. Farcry 3 is a great game but it doesnt mean all games should be open world. You can run around for 10 minutes before you bump into 4 guys, kill them in 30 seconds then go on another hike to find more. Not knocking the game, I loved it, just saying there is room for 2 schools of thought.
At least Crysis 3 will run on 64 bit wins7 without "tricks". I still can't play Crysis 1. And for the record, KZ 4 will not touch Crysis 3 Graphically that I'm sure of
The demo from KZ4 was a pretty big let down... Sony fangirls were pumping how the PS4 will leap frog PC's in graphics, and then the KZ4 demo is shown, and its like an impotent old man where nothing but dust puffs out. Wow, I couldn't stop giggling how silly FPS's looked on the PS4.... I thought this console was supposed to blow our minds?
I agree, KZ4 Looked good but not as good as n4g will have u believe. It's amazing that these Sony fanboys just think every game that was shown was so "amazing" . The only games I found to be worth my attention was Deep Down and Infamous. Sony fanboys need to accept that the ps4 can not touch a pc graphically. Like I said before KZ 4 looks good but not Crysis good
This makes me happy in pants.
Looks sweet ready to play tomorrow. But Origin ehhh
I thought everyone got over the whole Origin hate wagon last year?
I know right? Well what can we do. Ppl are so stuck in their ways. It really is true that humans find it hard to accept even a little change even if its for the better.
if it wasn't EA they would have got over it way earlier than that. And all these people seem to forget that everyone hated steam when it first came out.
What do you mean you thought everyone got over it last year?I just barly started using it. So speak for yourself and this is not out of disrespect towards you or anyone. I prefer a disc based game and of course steam. So that is where I stand ATM. I realize this is the future and when I evolve to Origin or, I feel more comfortable with it I might think otherwise. I also hear that origin scans your program data on windows and analysis what games you use and how you use that. Is that a fact I don't know; is it a myth I dunno. Until then I am yes uncomfortable with it. -This not a hate re post I respect Panda it is just my feelings on this digital platform.
sure it looks good but it's there a way we can hate others because it looks good on PC?? (just read the comments good job guys you found a way!) ;)
I call shenanigans, they all looked the same to me! Maybe it's just youtube compression :-/
Yeh youtube videos even at 1080p still doesnt give you the same visual look as if you where to play it.
I hope this runs on high settings on my mx440 ;] It still looks very good on low settings, but will look awesome on ultra high..
I'm sure its just youtubes terrible compression but I could barely see a difference between any of the settings. They all looked great!
Panda, 99% of that could be done with dx9, we all know it. The odd effect here and there is better with dx11, I've already been playing crisis 3 and yes it's very nice graphically. Gameplay is good as well. 3 looks better then 2, but more palette then anything else. and some fx been tightened up. I do hope for console players that the sp runs faster then mp. It needs to be 30fps + all the time.
Its not!!The game runs bellow 30fps most of the time on consoles.Just like Far cry 3.The only thing better is that it does not have that horrible screen tearing far cry 3 haves.But the framerate is very low and dont average the 30fps from what i have played on the console.Technical facts!
I feel lucky to not be a graphics/framerate whore sometimes :) I realized FC3 was running a a lower framerate when I first launched it, then I just forgot about it and had fun. I don't think I'm able to notice screen tearing either. and looking at this video I really don't see a difference between low and very high. I like pretty games, but I really couldn't care less about how realistic the light is.
Have fun drooling over the one pc game that makes it worth it fanboys. I guess having one game that shows what the pc is capible of is better than none. I look foward to hearing about this one till next-gen.
A short list of PC games that are leaps and bounds better than the console counterpart, some of these are PC exclusives. Dark Souls: Prepare to Die Edition Far Cry 3 Batman: Arkham Asylum Amnesia The Dark Descent Left 4 Dead 2 League of Legends Dishonored Guild Wars 2 The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim GTA IV Bioshock The Witcher 2 Assassins of Kings Sid Meier's Civilization V: Gods & Kings Max Payne 3 Mass Effect 3 Mass Effect 2 Fallout 3 Torchlight II Borderlands 2 Starcraft II: Wings of Liberty Crysis Diablo III Portal 2 The Orange Box DmC: Devil May Cry World of Warcraft F1 2012
in one gaming generation a console gamer will spend around $250 - $600 for a console for the next 4-10 yrs. in the same time a pc gamer will spend thousands upon thousands to have the "up to date" pc to be able to play current year games, if thats what your into then thats what your into.
How many time do idiots like you need to be told this? YOU DON'T NEED TO UPGRADE CONSTANTLY TO KEEP UP WITH GAMES!!! If console like graphics are ok, the pretty much any current pc hardware at or above the next consoles hardware, will run games for the whole next gen. A lot of people upgrade because they want to, not because they have to. If I don't want to upgrade, im sure my 680 can last through this gen.I know, I know, optimization is a magic wand that when waved makes mid range graphics cards equal to future high end pc tech lol. Optimization only goes so far, it's NOT MAGIC!
Consolers are too stupid to understand what you are saying. The sad part is that low setting graphics on PC is better than graphics on consoles. Yet they view upgrading graphics as a disadvantage for PC as though we all need super eye candy. ROFLOL.
Why do people bash wii u for graphics, yet when it's ps/xbox against pc graphics, "it's all about gameplay"?
throw your ps3 out of the window :)
Dark Souls: Prepare to Die Edition (was okay) Far Cry 3 (really?... Blender) Batman: Arkham Asylum (nice) Amnesia The Dark Descent Left 4 Dead 2 (....) League of Legends (....) Dishonored (meh... ugly faces ruined it) Guild Wars 2 (okay, i guess) The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (Holy Grail) GTA IV (uff... no mods = ugly) Bioshock (meh... diffrent "setting", yet notin new-ish) The Witcher 2 Assassins of Kings (The dwarves were funny... that´s about it) Sid Meier's Civilization V: Gods & Kings (.-.) Max Payne 3 (99% Best-HOLLYWOOD Game out there) Mass Effect 3 (Good phun...3) Mass Effect 2 (Good phun...2) Fallout 3 (oh boy... this one killed my free time (more than Skyrim) Torchlight II (meh... same cr-p like first one) Borderlands 2 (not my thing... liked 1st more) Starcraft II: Wings of Liberty (.....) Crysis (REALLY? was ugly back then and it still looks shabby today.. even at 3x 27" at ultra... -.-) Diablo III (uff... tough one) Portal 2 (again, first one was "new, fresh"... no need for 2nd installment) The Orange Box (HL2 FTW) DmC: Devil May Cry (f-ck off! Devil May Cry 1 and THE END!) World of Warcraft (....!?) F1 2012 (.. with this one, you lost all credibility) Just a FACT, a fact the never WILL DIE : Best Games are made on and for Consoles... (im a PC player, its cheaper over the year), Halo, GT, Foza, LG just to name 4! that sell well beyond the 10Mio. mark each.. the only thing on PC that comes near is/was D3 and for some reason nobody liked it (didnt play it, so can´t tell..). ON PC its HARD as nails to sell sumtin for over 1 Mio.... Crysis 3 is garbage, another Blender that brings NOTIN new to the genre... except for visuals. Maybe its time to get me a xbpsIV", heh
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.