100°
Submitted by Lelldorianx 573d ago | article

High-End Crysis 3 DIY Gaming PC Build Guide

GamersNexus: "The legacy left by the original Crysis is one of worldwide renown: Shipping at just around the same time as nVidia's 8800-series GPUs—which were ground-breaking in their own right—the game promised to push PC gaming to new heights. It delivered. Well, graphically, at least; Crytek's CryEngine has famously pushed multi-FPU (floating-point-unit) support to better accommodate multi-core chips, and that trend continues with CryEngine 3." (Crysis 3, PC, Tech)

Asuka  +   573d ago
In all honesty you dont need most of that to play crysis 3 in very high settings.

all you really need is:
i5 3570k (or you could save like $20 and go for the locked 3570. stock clock speeds are more than enough to run your games)
8GB DDR3 1600MHz (you dont need 1866MHz. 1600MHz is plenty fast enough)
GTX 670(you will save at least $100 by getting the 670 instead of a 680)

basically, you dont need to have such high-end cards to get crysis 3 to play on very high. If you are only going to be gaming on 1 monitor and @1920x1080p, the 670 should be more than enough
decrypt  +   573d ago
Lol true..

Its going to be a console port. Its not like the original Crysis where it really pushes hardware.
Athonline  +   573d ago
You mean it is not like original Crysis where there was little to no optimisation in order to "force" users to think that their hardware was outdated and cause Crytek were "bored" to optimise it....

Crysis 2 is better in terms of graphics and yet runs better than Crysis....why? optimisation.
Bobertt  +   573d ago
Wow that is my setup except i have 16gb, hopefully your right.
Mr Tretton  +   573d ago
decrypt, I've got a good PC and Crysis 1 is easier to run than 2 or the 3 beta. Regardless of some of the things C1 did graphically, C3 is absolutely more demanding by far, like it or not.

Also the suggestions given in that post are 'high-end' to the vast majority of people. Above all, your card must be DX11.
Athonline  +   573d ago
You must be the only person running the original Crysis in better FPS than 2! I can recall I had around 5 to 10 FPS increase in 2 from the original....

A quick source:
http://www.tomshardware.com...
chukamachine  +   573d ago
Just because it's easier to run, does not mean it's less demanding.

Crysis 1 was not optimised and warhead was only slighter better.

Crytek have updated their toolset and are doing fx that were not in crysis1 but are in crysis3.

As for the game.

It's better then 1-2 imo, but I still feel nothing towards the characters or missions.

That is where games like Uncharted win, because they make you feel part of it.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
40°

Why Destiny, Watch Dogs, and Titanfall Couldn’t Live Up to Everyone’s Unrealistic Expectations

7m ago - Twinfinite: Thus far, 2014 has seen some amazingly large releases. Over time, publishers have all... | PC
40°

After Watch Dogs, Titanfall, and Destiny, is 2014 the Year of Too Much Hype?

26m ago - Tony at Twinfinite asks: With three of the most anticipated games of the year having such moderat... | Industry
40°

iOS 8 - A Bundle of Joy for Developers?

43m ago - "In less than a week we'll see the release of iOS 8, with its many functional additions and impro... | iPhone
20°

Total War Rome 2: Emperor Edition – Patch 15 Beta Impressions | IncGamers

48m ago - On the eve of release for Rome 2‘s Emperor Edition, IncGamers' Peter Parrish returns to the game... | PC
Ad

Destiny The Game

Now - Explore Mars, Rediscover Venus, Reclaim the moon, Protect Earth. Become Legend. The wait is over! Destiny is now available to play, Pick up your... | Promoted post
40°

Kaz Hirai: Strategic Moves and Future Sensitivity are the Axis of Product Appeal

1h ago - Kaz Hirai talks about the future of Sony and the PS4 in an interview on AV Watch | PS4
Related content from friends