Submitted by Lelldorianx 962d ago | article

High-End Crysis 3 DIY Gaming PC Build Guide

GamersNexus: "The legacy left by the original Crysis is one of worldwide renown: Shipping at just around the same time as nVidia's 8800-series GPUs—which were ground-breaking in their own right—the game promised to push PC gaming to new heights. It delivered. Well, graphically, at least; Crytek's CryEngine has famously pushed multi-FPU (floating-point-unit) support to better accommodate multi-core chips, and that trend continues with CryEngine 3." (Crysis 3, PC, Tech)

Asuka  +   961d ago
In all honesty you dont need most of that to play crysis 3 in very high settings.

all you really need is:
i5 3570k (or you could save like $20 and go for the locked 3570. stock clock speeds are more than enough to run your games)
8GB DDR3 1600MHz (you dont need 1866MHz. 1600MHz is plenty fast enough)
GTX 670(you will save at least $100 by getting the 670 instead of a 680)

basically, you dont need to have such high-end cards to get crysis 3 to play on very high. If you are only going to be gaming on 1 monitor and @1920x1080p, the 670 should be more than enough
decrypt  +   961d ago
Lol true..

Its going to be a console port. Its not like the original Crysis where it really pushes hardware.
Athonline  +   961d ago
You mean it is not like original Crysis where there was little to no optimisation in order to "force" users to think that their hardware was outdated and cause Crytek were "bored" to optimise it....

Crysis 2 is better in terms of graphics and yet runs better than Crysis....why? optimisation.
Bobertt  +   961d ago
Wow that is my setup except i have 16gb, hopefully your right.
Mr Tretton  +   961d ago
decrypt, I've got a good PC and Crysis 1 is easier to run than 2 or the 3 beta. Regardless of some of the things C1 did graphically, C3 is absolutely more demanding by far, like it or not.

Also the suggestions given in that post are 'high-end' to the vast majority of people. Above all, your card must be DX11.
Athonline  +   961d ago
You must be the only person running the original Crysis in better FPS than 2! I can recall I had around 5 to 10 FPS increase in 2 from the original....

A quick source:
chukamachine  +   961d ago
Just because it's easier to run, does not mean it's less demanding.

Crysis 1 was not optimised and warhead was only slighter better.

Crytek have updated their toolset and are doing fx that were not in crysis1 but are in crysis3.

As for the game.

It's better then 1-2 imo, but I still feel nothing towards the characters or missions.

That is where games like Uncharted win, because they make you feel part of it.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
New stories

Why Rise Of The Tomb Raider Will Be Even Better Than Tomb Raider (2013)

11m ago - ThisGenGaming says "With the announcement of digital pre-order for Crystal Dynamic’s Rise of the... | PC

PS4 Gets 10 Colorful Disgaea 5 Themes on the North American PSN; Screenshots Inside

35m ago - If you want to customize your PS4 dashboard with Disgaea 5: Alliance of Vengeance, NIS America re... | PS4

MoreConsole takes on Destiny: The Taken King

Now - MoreConsole's rag-tag band of guardians finally make it to the Oryx's ship...but can they make it out alive? | Promoted post

Cyberpunk Themed Invisible Apartment 2 Hacks Our Hearts - Cliqist

1h ago - Serena Nelson writes: "While I originally backed Invisible Apartment 2 for the Cyberpunk themes,... | PC

Diablo Gets Cards in FORCED: Eternal Arenas

1h ago - Gary Stott writes: "FORCED: Eternal Arenas fuses a variety of genres, but is essentially Diablo w... | PC

Introducing Black Ops Fridays — Weekly Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 Live Streams Throughout October

2h ago - By Scott Lowe on October 08, 2015 // Communications Manager, Activision: The November 6 launch... | PC