100°
Submitted by Lelldorianx 864d ago | article

High-End Crysis 3 DIY Gaming PC Build Guide

GamersNexus: "The legacy left by the original Crysis is one of worldwide renown: Shipping at just around the same time as nVidia's 8800-series GPUs—which were ground-breaking in their own right—the game promised to push PC gaming to new heights. It delivered. Well, graphically, at least; Crytek's CryEngine has famously pushed multi-FPU (floating-point-unit) support to better accommodate multi-core chips, and that trend continues with CryEngine 3." (Crysis 3, PC, Tech)

Asuka  +   864d ago
In all honesty you dont need most of that to play crysis 3 in very high settings.

all you really need is:
i5 3570k (or you could save like $20 and go for the locked 3570. stock clock speeds are more than enough to run your games)
8GB DDR3 1600MHz (you dont need 1866MHz. 1600MHz is plenty fast enough)
GTX 670(you will save at least $100 by getting the 670 instead of a 680)

basically, you dont need to have such high-end cards to get crysis 3 to play on very high. If you are only going to be gaming on 1 monitor and @1920x1080p, the 670 should be more than enough
decrypt  +   864d ago
Lol true..

Its going to be a console port. Its not like the original Crysis where it really pushes hardware.
Athonline  +   864d ago
You mean it is not like original Crysis where there was little to no optimisation in order to "force" users to think that their hardware was outdated and cause Crytek were "bored" to optimise it....

Crysis 2 is better in terms of graphics and yet runs better than Crysis....why? optimisation.
Bobertt  +   864d ago
Wow that is my setup except i have 16gb, hopefully your right.
Mr Tretton  +   864d ago
decrypt, I've got a good PC and Crysis 1 is easier to run than 2 or the 3 beta. Regardless of some of the things C1 did graphically, C3 is absolutely more demanding by far, like it or not.

Also the suggestions given in that post are 'high-end' to the vast majority of people. Above all, your card must be DX11.
Athonline  +   864d ago
You must be the only person running the original Crysis in better FPS than 2! I can recall I had around 5 to 10 FPS increase in 2 from the original....

A quick source:
http://www.tomshardware.com...
chukamachine  +   864d ago
Just because it's easier to run, does not mean it's less demanding.

Crysis 1 was not optimised and warhead was only slighter better.

Crytek have updated their toolset and are doing fx that were not in crysis1 but are in crysis3.

As for the game.

It's better then 1-2 imo, but I still feel nothing towards the characters or missions.

That is where games like Uncharted win, because they make you feel part of it.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
20°

Lab Zero Games Working on new Action/RPG Indivisible

39m ago - Lab Zero Games, known for creating indie hit Skullgirls, revealed its next project today, an acti... | PC
30°

Modder Mashes Dark Souls and Skyrim Together, Looks Super Awesome

39m ago - OnlySP: By making use of a variety of community developed mods for The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, a... | PC
Ad

Booooo

Now - Step into the shoes – or rather, the ectoplasm – of a peaceful ghost residing inside a haunted mansion, thriving in the cold and dark environments... | Promoted post
40°

Dark Souls III Hands-Off Preview Impressions | OnlySP

44m ago - OnlySP: In a dimly lit room full of mist, Hidetaka Miyazaki, Director of both Dark Souls and Bloo... | PC
30°

A Beginner’s Guide to Heroes of the Storm

50m ago - PCInvasion is back from the Nexus with a few bits of advice on starting out in Heroes of the Stor... | PC
40°

Japan Expo 2015 screenshots and U.S. box art for Sword Art Online: Lost Song

53m ago - New Japan Expo 2015 screenshots, along with the U.S. box art, has been revealed for Sword Art Onl... | PS4