100°
Submitted by Lelldorianx 580d ago | article

High-End Crysis 3 DIY Gaming PC Build Guide

GamersNexus: "The legacy left by the original Crysis is one of worldwide renown: Shipping at just around the same time as nVidia's 8800-series GPUs—which were ground-breaking in their own right—the game promised to push PC gaming to new heights. It delivered. Well, graphically, at least; Crytek's CryEngine has famously pushed multi-FPU (floating-point-unit) support to better accommodate multi-core chips, and that trend continues with CryEngine 3." (Crysis 3, PC, Tech)

Asuka  +   580d ago
In all honesty you dont need most of that to play crysis 3 in very high settings.

all you really need is:
i5 3570k (or you could save like $20 and go for the locked 3570. stock clock speeds are more than enough to run your games)
8GB DDR3 1600MHz (you dont need 1866MHz. 1600MHz is plenty fast enough)
GTX 670(you will save at least $100 by getting the 670 instead of a 680)

basically, you dont need to have such high-end cards to get crysis 3 to play on very high. If you are only going to be gaming on 1 monitor and @1920x1080p, the 670 should be more than enough
decrypt  +   580d ago
Lol true..

Its going to be a console port. Its not like the original Crysis where it really pushes hardware.
Athonline  +   580d ago
You mean it is not like original Crysis where there was little to no optimisation in order to "force" users to think that their hardware was outdated and cause Crytek were "bored" to optimise it....

Crysis 2 is better in terms of graphics and yet runs better than Crysis....why? optimisation.
Bobertt  +   580d ago
Wow that is my setup except i have 16gb, hopefully your right.
Mr Tretton  +   580d ago
decrypt, I've got a good PC and Crysis 1 is easier to run than 2 or the 3 beta. Regardless of some of the things C1 did graphically, C3 is absolutely more demanding by far, like it or not.

Also the suggestions given in that post are 'high-end' to the vast majority of people. Above all, your card must be DX11.
Athonline  +   580d ago
You must be the only person running the original Crysis in better FPS than 2! I can recall I had around 5 to 10 FPS increase in 2 from the original....

A quick source:
http://www.tomshardware.com...
chukamachine  +   580d ago
Just because it's easier to run, does not mean it's less demanding.

Crysis 1 was not optimised and warhead was only slighter better.

Crytek have updated their toolset and are doing fx that were not in crysis1 but are in crysis3.

As for the game.

It's better then 1-2 imo, but I still feel nothing towards the characters or missions.

That is where games like Uncharted win, because they make you feel part of it.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories

Endless Legend Review | IncGamers

5m ago - IncGamers' Peter Parrish finds Endless Legend to be a 4x strategy title with wonderful presentati... | PC
30°

Hyrule Warriors Gameplay Video

20m ago - Genevieve at Skewed and Reviewed takes her hacks with Hyrule warriors. She said the game is basic... | Wii U
30°

10 Reasons You're Wrong About Destiny

38m ago - It's not hard to see the many things Bungie's latest does better than anyone else right now. | Xbox 360
40°

KickBeat Special Edition Review - TXH

44m ago - Neil writes "Zen Studios have taken the rhythm action genre, combined rock, drum & bass and hip h... | PS4
Ad

Celebrate the new TV season with Filmwatch

Now - With the 2014-2015 TV season right around the corner, come join us on Filmwatch as we celebrate and give all you TV lovers something to enjoy! | Promoted post
30°

Destiny Review | CoinOpTV

45m ago - Destiny is a mixed bag of goodies. On the positive side the game handles great, looks gorgeous an... | Xbox 360
Related content from friends