GenGAME writes: "For New Super Mario Bros. to produce a title that truly claims the title of “worthy successor to Super Mario World,” Nintendo is going to need to get over this content problem. They’re going to need to stop making new games basically remixed level packs and start producing actual expansions to Mario’s world like they did back in the 80s and 90s.
"The saddest part is that they haven’t been shy about doing this in the 3D games – we explored Peach’s Castle in Super Mario 64, Delfino Island in Sunshine, and the vast galaxies beyond Mushroom World in Galaxy – but in New Super Mario Bros., it’s been the same old worlds over and over and over again."
Well isn't that because this isn't the systems 3D roam around Mario game. It's just a quick launch game by making a HD New Super Mario game. The real Mario game is yet to come and it better not be Super Mario Galaxy 3, I want something new and fresh....hopefully it will be an open world type game, the Wii U can handle it now. It could be massive to explore the world of Mario GTA style....the Mushroom Kingdom, Bowsers dark region, deserts, forests, snowy moutains and a ton of ways to move around the map....unlockable karts, cars, bikes, Latikus cloud, glide on rivers with an ice power up or fly around with your cape power up.
It could be amazing if they pull it off right and make it massive.
I'd love to believe there'll be more bigger and better games to come... but I'm just not seeing it with the way Nintendo has been treating the series.
One thing I'd like is for a brand new New Super game with some fresh ideas and a remake of an older game included using the new engine. Online multiplayer too. That'd be nice.
I like the NSMB games for what they are, but I totally understand at this point why people are disappointed with the feeling of monotony they may feel from them.
If Nintendo put in half the resources into the 2D Mario Series that they did the 3D Mario series we'd get something special.
You'd think the market reactions were reversed the way Nintendo has treated this series. 2D Mario games used to be given the royal treatment, now they are given recycled music and recycled content..it's embarrassing..I'd be embarrassed to release something to the world with such a half assed effort.
2D Mario is the series that skyrocketed Mario to icon status..3D Mario marks his decline..and Nintendo treats 2D Mario like a spinoff. Could you imagine the consumer backlash on the internet if Nintendo recycled music on a 3D Mario game or Zelda?
In any case, changes are coming. Selling 55K is abysmal, its barely treading above Vita territory. This is unacceptable. Hopefully Nintendo gets back to pleasing the consumers instead of self indulgence and pleasing themselves.
Rayman Legends is every bit as epic as it looks.
Don't they realize that people want a fresh new Mario game. It's just rehash after rehash. I hate to say it but it seems Mario been stymied by the 3D effect. It wouldn't hurt them to use 2D sprites again... right? It's one reasons I still play games like Scott vs the World or Closure.
Fans have clamored for a 2d sonic title, but were handed more 3d versions instead. I'd like to see at least one 2D sprite based Mario or Sonic game before 2015 but I'm not gonna hold my breath.
This is the case with Mario sunshine and Mario Galaxy.
Mario Sunshine in my opinion has better graphics than Mario Galaxy although I will admit that MG game play is a lot better than MS.
So why not give us both? I want MS graphics & art style to return with better game play mechanics on Nintendo's next Mario Galaxy.
The same goes for Zelda. My bet is The next Zelda Game won't look anything close to the Zelda Tech demo because it seem though Nintendo can't give us both, graphics and game play for some reason.
Why can't Nintendo be more like Microsoft and Sony? Both Sony and Microsoft franchises have to evolves both visually and playability.
I just wish would take their franchises to new height. No more of this up and down crap.