David Lynch: ''Crysis 3 on PC looks totally jaw-dropping.
That shouldn’t really come as a major surprise, Crytek’s series is known for bleeding edge technological innovation, but with the series making the jump to consoles with Crysis 2, there was a change in creative direction that didn’t quite hit the mark in the same way as the original PC game.
With Crysis 3, Crytek is ready to reclaim its ‘you wish your PC was powerful enough to play this’ crown and with next-gen consoles just over the horizon, now is the perfect time to remind gamers why the PC will always have the edge over consoles.''
100°
70°
70°
100°
Ad 
150°
0°
40°
30°
20°
20°
Do open world like BF3 with 64players, then we'll talk.
PS4 will bitch slap Crysis3.
Guerilla Games!
I agree KZ4 will blow Crysis 3 away. KZ4 will have amazing graphics and so much action going it will look unbelievable. Just wait I hope we see it on Feb 20th. Crytek on a console can't beat Sony's 1st party studios. They just talk while Sony delivers. Look at The Last of Us and GoW: Ascension.
Uncharted 3 and GoW have good graphics. Hell even Gears of War 3 has better graphics. Killzone graphics are overrated.
The games have never been a match to the gaming benchmarks on pc though. How could they?
What many console only gamers never accept is that their hardware is old the day it releases.
But why so much buzz about those things?
Killzone 2 and 3 have been by far the better games. Crysis has been a benchmark. Gorgeous graphics, but when it comes to how the games played, Killzone wins easily. It's almost like comparing different things.
It will be interesting to see what the guys fromm GG bring to the table with the PS4. I am not positive it is just Killzone 4 since they stated they were working on a new IP last year.
Some people like Crysis. Okay, I am not holding that against them. However for me Crysis always felt like a game in search of heart. The AI is shoddy, predictable and absolutely no fun. I do not know what to call the aliens because it looks as if the design went in 5 different directions at one.
The game comes off like the movie Battleship.
Top name involved? Check.
Flashy effects? Check.
Budget? Check.
Down your throat advertising? Check.
Forgettable? In a new York minute.
and BF4 will bitch slap video games 4ever
I don't know why people overrate killzone's graphics so much, it's ugly color filter and low res textures must look amazing for console gamers.
http://i.imgur.com/jBNneS2....
I doubt that at least not at lunge, maybe a year or 2 after yea but lunge it will match the graphics if anything, And you are a fool if you believe other wise.
but even I must admit that I think it really foolish to compare a PC to a console any how.
Dam people read fast I had 1 agree and 2 disagrees before i even got threw editing but any ways to the people who disagreed with me you are a true fan boy if you really think at lunge you are going to see games the same level as Crysis 3 running on in high end pc at max, you people need to get real why that would be nice don't get your hopes up just to be disappointed. now you may get a bunch fake CG videos that they claim is real time like they did with the ps3 but that's about it, If either Sony or Microsoft lunge with a game on crysis 3 level interns of graphics I will be overly impressed let alone topping them.
Optimization will start on the API level. The risk I see is that the next gen consoles have so much power that you can simply port PC code over.
But it will require even more going into detail and optimize for consoles. That is using the HW to it's fullest.
Reducing draw calls was mentioned quite often before. And what that means is, that neither desktop DirectX nor OpenGL will be able to compete with that. But a dev will have to go a little bit deeper and implement some "proprietary" code how they handle vertex buffers, lighting etc. Reducing draw calls shifts more work into the game. Which will in return result in much better performance.
Both MS's Dx for the next XBox and libGCM have very low overhead down to the metal APIs which will squeeze quite more out of next gen consoles than just "another mid-high-end" PC. I think people will be up for quite some surprises with those new titles.
If Quantic Dream can - without a doubt - squeeze the best facial expressions out of any game on the aging PS3, then it makes me wonder what they can do with a much faster HW.
I wasn't impressed from the Crysis 3 MP demo. It's more of the same, really. Overpowered soldiers makes it almost unplayable. I didn't really enjoy that. The "cloak" gameplay is quite annoying. It's still pretty but it's not the end it all game; not even visually. Visuals are top tear, not denying that. But other games can match that, still.
Were you expecting something else from a company that made a distribution deal with EA? Crytek has become another shallow, soulless company that keeps bullshitting their fanbase. They did it with Crysis 2 and are now doing it with 3. I wouldn't expect anything more from them at this point.
Crysis was a major letdown with broken gameplay due to the fact that you can beat the entire game easily using cloak mode, while armour mode is utterly useless. Story and characters were meh too. Everyone hates Rico, but at least he's memorable. I only beat Crysis a few weeks ago and the most memorable thing about it was that turtle you see after swimming to the beach near the start.
Oh yeah, I beat it twice too.
Also, worth mentioning that on my second play through, the buggy POS that Crysis is screwed up during the final aircraft carrier section, and jumped straight past the section where you pick up the TAC cannon or whatever it is called. End result being that the game forced me to go up against the last boss without actually having the weapon that you must have in order to defeat it. GREAT!!!!!
Play Crysis 1 on pc with the highest settings and resolution and you will see why it's always been the benchmark game.
I always knew PC games looked better, but until I got my own machine and saw/played it for myself, the difference was incredible. You really have to experience it to see just how much better it really is. Not just graphics either, FPS makes a HUGE difference.
Too many people who never actually played it on a good PC slate it for only have decent graphics and no gameplay. As Crysis fans know that is far, far from the truth. It had some of the best gameplay in any FPS so far. Loved every second of that beautiful game. Will reply it through again soon with new GPU on ultra everything at super high res...
http://uk.ign.com/videos/20...
Crysis 3 will be like Crysis 1 in consoles... Next gen will be good but won't run MAXIMUM CRYSIS 3 (Original from Developers not even couting with mods) 1920X1080 1080p 60 stable frames per second.
And yeah "no shit" 1st party devs are better then crytek in doing games at their console, they know the hardware/software in our out it's their platform they've grown on it
It costs the same amount the ps3 did at launch
I could build me a nice machine with $600-$700, but it won't match next gen consoles.
And it's really not that expensive considering the new consoles will probably be 399 and the PS3 launched at 600.
I'm not saying it's the same price as consoles but this 3000 dollar business is a joke. I highly doubt they are throwing a gtx 660ti in there.
We'll know for sure soon
Crysis 2 was just garbage + shitty multiplayer.
Crysis 3 seems to be following the same path.
Worried about next gen my ass. Call me when Crysis 3 catches up to Farcry 3 in gameplay...
Consoles are different and are designed for the sole purpose of playing games thus it's much easier to focus on and create better looking games than on pc..
Look at Crysis 3 on the xbox 360/ps3.. I want you to try and get a computer that has the same specs as these two consoles and try to run Crysis 3 on it, it most definitely won't work and if it does it would be really ugly in terms of visual quality and extremely slow/laggy. It's amazing that these 7 year old consoles are able to run games like this smoothly
Plus the fact that PC gamers can upgrade at anytime. So with all this being said, this next gen still doesn't stand a chance. So quit bagging on Crysis people!
but my pc monitor is 5000p by 5000p, the facts: my phone video looks good on a 23" monitor
but i have 64 gigs of ram, the facts unless your video editing you just wasted your money
Never bagged about Crysis gfx, played Heavenly Sword, Warhawk(DS!), Uncharted:Drakes Fortune, KZ2(DS!), Siren:BloodCurse, MGS4, Uncharted:AmongThieves, GOW3, ModNation, Gran Turismo5, KZ4, Uncharted:DrakesDeception, Journey, PixelJunk, Limbo, Flower, Dead Nation instead.
Crytek are overrated in console department and some of the worst developer when it comes to AI. They always need 800gbRAM because they are lazy PC turds. 6 vs 6 MP LMAO!!!
First party studios bitchslapped them with a splitted 0,5gbRAM!!!
next gen consoles won't come close to bf3 in ultra on pc in 2560x1600 either, let alone bf4
consoles need to not even be compared to pc in any way, shape or form, its like comparing a handgun to a high powered sniper rifle, sure, they're both guns but
expect performance and graphics of a decent pc from 2010, and your about in the ballpark of what next gen consoles will offer
1080p, medium-high textures (no ultra), 30 frames, 2x-4x anti aliasing, v-sync, so basically, a 3 year old gaming laptop, thats ps4/nextbox