Randy Pitchford, president of Gearbox, has stated that he spoke the truth about Aliens Colonial Maines in the past. Recently on twitter he was quick to respond to allegations of lying during presentations which showed the game in a different and seemingly more polished state.
"No one likes to be called a liar, especially if their intent was pure and they always spoke the truth when they spoke it."
The gameplay demo that was shown hyped up the game and gave it a certain level of expectation among fans, the final product is a joke in comparison.
I can't believe these con artists can get away with such deceitful marketing. Normally i don't get so mad but when they take gamers, us, for fools i get really realllly pissed off.
But you don't all buy enough of your games. Reap what you sow. The only way you change this and keep it from happening is by buying more games that do things correctly to show your install base has some weight behind it.
You're an entitled bunch and you need to grow a pair.
OHHHHHH IT DOESN'T HAVE DYNAMIC LIGHTING!!! WAHHHHHHHHHHH WAHHHHHHHHH! MOd it. You love modding things. How hard is it to add dynamic lighting.
Ive seen pitchford show off games before and he comes off as a very honest, gamer's gamer to me. I probably won't buy this game, but i'll still buy gearbox games for sure. They must have been under some type of constraint.
I guess I don't care so much about visual effects so much as the game content and how well the game runs.
In the defense of people who bought the game I thought it was disappointing that the sequence with the turret was completely missing from that video they showed, but for all i know it just glitched out or something in that particular instance.
The whole affair is about blatant lies and misinformation , not really about graphics . Game was never touted as the next crysis on any platform
Aliens:CM E3 Demo = GREAT!
Aliens:CM full game = The f@ck??!! I paid $60 for a game with horrible AI, graphics, gameplays, story??!! And the multiplayer is buggy too?
KZ2 E3 Demo = WOW!!
KZ2 full game = WOW!!!
You see the difference?
Btw, I doubt you even have 2 PS3s. Why would you buy/get a second one when you clearly felt "lied to" when KZ2 came out? And if they are collecting dust, do something better with them! Give them to a friend or family, or maybe even charity! At least you'd be doing something kind to the world than just ranting on the Internet (not that I have contributed much yet either).
You hate the PS3 for some reason, and you love the Xbox 360. We get it. Now move on with your life.
If you already purchased it then you have to ask yourself why you did, even though its been critically smashed to pieces in previews and reviews.
Not being rude but there's some pretty amazing games coming out. Unless you've got money to burn why would you even consider buying this at launch? If you're a member of N4G you should have known it was terrible.
Not really , there have been a few movie based games that were good . Hell when it comes to alien , the alien trilogy games are quite fondly remembered
The problem is that 90% of them are developed in record time , hence rushed so they could release them alongside the theater launches .
And the good batman games (i'm assuming you mean the arkham ones) arent movie based anyway
------------
"Ive seen pitchford show off games before and he comes off as a very honest, gamer's gamer to me. I probably won't buy this game, but i'll still buy gearbox games for sure. They must have been under some type of constraint."
Oh look, an apologist's already popped up.
"OHHHHHH IT DOESN'T HAVE DYNAMIC LIGHTING!!! WAHHHHHHHHHHH WAHHHHHHHHH! MOd it. You love modding things. How hard is it to add dynamic lighting. "
Jesus christ....
The gaming media is always quiet about this kind of stuff. They won't risk their relationship with a big publisher, otherwise they might not get advance copies of Borderlands 3 when it eventually comes out, and by god they need those hits.
Where creative media is concerned there has to be some kind of leniency with what is shown versus what is delivered because for marketing's sake they developers have to release gameplay footage but it's still a work in progress so they can't be accused of false advertising if shortly after that footage was released they made a decision that would affect it's presence in the final product.
Game developers are actually more entitled and protected in this regard than any consumer. If they could be held accountable for this sort of thing, demos and gameplay previews would be a scarce and/or very controlled and limited thing.
I agree with those of you seeking an apology though. He may not like being called a liar, but who cares. Don't use your public reach for defending your ego, try using it to hear and apologize to the masses out there who just paid full price for a subpar action game.
And he's President of Gearbox, so I don't buy him being innocent.
randy is one of my favorite gaming people because he is always active on social media and a lot of time he tells it how it is
so one bad game, which wasn't even a in home development, this may have something to do with sega and 20th century fox
This is what limited RAM will do.
This guy lied his as* off.
http://n4g.com/user/blogpos...
Gearbox needs to take time to actually revamp things. If they don't want to do that, or its too time consuming, then scrap it. Releasing piles of crap for 60 dollars then saying "oh well back then this was good" is not wise.
It makes me wonder if Borderlands is just kind of a fluke success story.
And the physics was also completely dreadful and the Ai sucked too. (From the small amount of Aliens that did come at you).
It's mad to me because that is where it's hype came from. Showing people will be wowed by nothing but visuals. It was literally him running around watching **** happen and pretending to be influencing it.
Telling a fib, stretching the truth, misleading people... Doesn't matter how you word it, anyway you spin it the Aliens Colonial Marine Demos was a blatant lie!
I mean the guy made it piut like they made the entire game when they didn't.
I have to admit though they almost got me, I thought it was going to be amazing. Not to mention all the hype it got for the Wii U version.
Yeah, no.
Sigh.
EDIT: That's not to say it it's impossible for the Wii U version to be more like the demo. Here's hoping, yeah?
What if Nintendo threw a few extra bucks at Gearbox so that the "Delayed" wii u version would be the best version, and ends up looking like that 2012 demo, making people think that the wii u is only capable of having graphics look that good, thus having people run out and buy wii u's. 0_o
Thats very sly of you nintendo, very sly.
/s
So while it might make sense from the standpoint of, "The Wii U has the best looking console version," as a whole the whole thing would fall flat on its face if a Wii U version does, indeed, turn out to look better than a PC version.
Oh, and just to ask... how many here have boycotted Gearbox games? I have until an apology and explanation come out, so... yeah.
Dead Space (well kinda they made a movie about it)
Hitman (well kinda they made a movie about it)
Kinect Star wars (oh wait that was horible)
Kane & Lynch (oh wait that never got made)
Resident Evil (well no that doesnt work either)
Assassins Creed (oh wait that isnt out yet)
Prince of Persia forget sands (playable at best)
So take what i wrote without reading the in bracekts part & i did the same thing as Randy Pitchford!
Both took the same direction as Colonial Marines in telling a different story in the same universe, yet both were arguably higher quality and better written than their modern film counterparts.
Shame the formula didn't work for Colonial Marines, but you've got to wonder what was going on behind the scenes when a game has such an extended development time and yet ends up feeling unpolished, rushed and buggy (hello Duke Nukem Forever, Haze, Kameo...)
Bottom line is he lied, mislead and took 6 years to deliver this sorry excuse of a game. He has let Sega down who paid them to deliver the game, he let his team down, he let the franchise down, he let James Cameron down, he let us down and now he is trying to say otherwise when we have evidence in black and white with what he said, what he showed us and what he delivered. Pathetic!
He also wouldn't have missed the point of the original movie, which was to subvert the gung ho military attitude by having the marines be hopelessly outmatched. The man is incompetent at best for allowing this mess of a game to exist, a liar at worst for trying to pass that demo off as actual gameplay.
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
Or Gearbox made this game while on a bathroom break from making Borderlands 2.
Either way, Randy is a blatant liar and should be ashamed.
Played it on PC and PS3 today.
PC obviously is the best looking, but does not look like the demo.
PS3 version looks ok for what it is, runs ok.
I don't think the graphics are the main problem with this game and neither is the sound.
The problem is the controls, feels way to stiff. The other issue is the way the aliens move, and the acid once you have shot them looks silly.
So far i'm giving this a 6.6 on what I've played. It could go up or down, I've just crashed into the planet.
I recently finished DEADSPACE3. my verdict. 8.
Felt dragged out and the ending is garbage imo.
What i don't get is the fan loyalty, thinking that gearbox are gifted devs, when the most recent and popular example of their work, Borderlands 2, is more on par with the Aliens title delivered instead of the one promised.
So yeah, I think Gearbox has potential. They just need to actually apply themselves to a game for it to shine.
And really, it the kind of defensive and blind loyalty among the fan base that needs to stop.
Borderlands 2 was little improved over the first game just as the next will be a little improved over it. And still a Borderlands 3 wont be anything like the "potential" of the Aliens trailer. it wont need to be.
https://www.youtube.com/wat...
Its a combination of the gameplay, animations, AI, graphics, and broken promises. It goes beyond just missing some sequences and dynamic lighting my friend.
Actual game..."shit and nothing like previous footage shown"
Pitchford..."they'll (gamers) still buy our games no matter what".(counts gamers/suckers money)
I knew this game was going to suck. I posted it months ago to many many many "disagrees". Who's laughing now dum dums? Me. How did I know? Because Gearbox is a constantly over-rated crappy butt wiping company who for whatever they touch turns to dulls-ville. Well, maybe borderlands was good but that's about it. Mediocre effort. Mediocre quality. Mediocre gameplay. Shame on people who repeatedly support this kind of underhanded business model. Reminds me of Warz. Maybe Pitchford and Titov will get together and whip up something extra special to scam more gamers. What a fucking twat. These guys will never see one red cent of my cash even if they make (Im laughing now)...wait for it..."game of the year" Who am I kidding? Gearbox make goty? bahahaha... oh man. I'll eat my own crap if that EVER happens. Know why he has such a big smile up there? Because you've made him very rich and will continue to do so, and he doesnt give a shit about gamers.
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
Edit: Infact here is a Demo from OCTOBER! Now if all this stuff about Gearboxes original work being scrapped etc is true. Then Gearbox must have some staff if they built a whole game again in under 3 months....
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
What I don't get though is that if the original game looked that good, then even if they outsourced it, how the fuck did it get changed that much? How do you take a game and make it worse? If Timegate were really the ones who fucked everything up then they have a lot to answer for. There's no excuse for making the graphics, audio, gameplay, atmosphere, and everything else worse than it was before.
Seriously what the hell happened to this game?!
Yes they messed up, but they outsourced to another developer who made it crap, not Gearbox.
Who's really to blame here? Yes there's false advertising, and Randy should be dealt with, but after the amazing borderlands 2 game, we can see that Gearbox have the ability to really commit to and produce a high quality product if they work on it 110% from conception to end.
Being able to do you job well, even REALLY well, is still no excuse for misleading consumers for a quick profit.
Gearbox may not have developed it, but it also didn't mention that the footage advertised didn't match the final product. They didn't make the game, but they still published it, and kept their mouth shut about it because they cared more about getting sales from it than giving the consumers accurate information.
And, really? Who the hell cares THAT MUCH for Borderlands 3? Borderlands 2 was pretty much the first game with a few minor improvements. That's not a bad thing, but it's not like this is Beyond Good and Evil 2 here.
And, no, don't say, "They needed more time!" They were contracted to do this in 2007. They pushed it off for Borderlands. They pushed it off for the release of DNF. They pushed it off for Borderlands 2. They had a contractual agreement to make the game and they kept pushing it off. SEGA's been pissing me off lately, but they aren't the ones in the wrong here and I'd be suing Gearbox for quite a bit of money if I were them. "Gearbox was too busy with Borderlands 2." You've JUST pointed out the problem, man.
Think about this: Aliens is a 34 year-old franchise with millions of fans. Gearbox says, "Sure! We'll make a game that is FRIGGING CANON and please everybody!" Instead of working on an absolutely HUMONGOUS product, they pushed it onto a small developer with a small budget while they reaped the rewards of Borderlands 2. It's pathetic behavior and the backlash from fans now is part of the punishment they deserve for such laziness and for telling complete lies to everyone. Smh.