40°
Submitted by edsmith1990 510d ago | opinion piece

Why Games Matter - The Industry Needs Second Hand Games

Ed Smith of IBTimes UK writes: "Unconfirmed console rumours are like episodes of Law and Order - there are hundreds of them and they're all rubbish. But if the murmurs are right for once and the next Xbox won't run second hand games, well, at least then we'll be finally able to know what we've all suspected for a while, that videogames are consumer electronics and that developers are just factories.

"I get that this would be a measure to curb piracy, and as much as anyone at Microsoft, I dislike pirates. The idea that you shouldn't have to pay for something just because it's media or intangible or made by somebody who's rich already is absurd. In the same way that someone made a chair or an oven, someone made whatever it is you're watching and you ought to pay for it.

"I get where this idea might be coming from; I get how Microsoft wants everybody who plays something by one of their artists to pay money to that artist. But at the same time, isn't it just sort of...evil? Because not everyone can afford £40 for a videogame, and a lot of eager people who play games will be effectively priced out of their hobby. (Microsoft, Next-Gen, Xbox 360)

edonus  +   510d ago
No it doesnt.

Its so funny when you here so called business types talking about the perception of the market and pricing people out. They appear to not believe in the free market system. Prices will adjust to demand and appeal. If a company released a game at $100 and no one bought it they would take the price down until it hits a point were they do buy it.
A second hand market cuts the developers and company out of the loop. The love that someone has for their product is of little concern if it doesnt directly lead to profits for them. There is no incentive.

Look at this scenario,
1 million people buy MGS4 they set up a network were they play it for a week(or a month doesnt really matter) then they sell that game to another million $10 cheaper. And the next set of people do the same thing.

A $60 game would have a sale cycle of 6 generating total money movement of 210 million dollars. The only devs and company only receive 60 million of that.

2 things.

The game devs can easily facilitate the price drops based on the market. They want to make as much as they can off of the game too so it would be in their interest. The only negative to the consumer market is that they wont be able to get refund on trade ins to buy new games. Believe it or not that is actually good because the other way left open channels to justify keeping pricing high. When games sale begin to slow or dwindle the industry will be forced to re evaluate their pricing.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
40°

PS4's Easy Architecture Allowed Drifter To Be Ported In A Matter of Days

10m ago - Prior to the PlayStation 4 launch, there were talks on how the new system will be easier to code... | PS4
20°

Who Will Be Crowned Greatest Smash Player Alive at EVO 2014? "5 Gods" vs "3 Underdogs"

17m ago - NE: "Before EVO 2013, Super Smash Brothers had been for the most part a grassroots community,... | Wii U
10°

Wolfenstein: The New Order Review | Game Podunk

18m ago - GP: "Wolfenstein: The New Order is a brilliant shooter that makes all the right moves. Fun, explo... | PC
10°

The Wolf Among Us: Episode 5 - Cry Wolf Review & Gameplay | GamersNexus

18m ago - GamersNexus: "Nine months after releasing its first episode, Telltale Games’ The Wolf Among Us ha... | PC
Ad

Start Making Games for the PS4

Now - Want to design the next generation of video games? Start learning game design today. Click for more info on how to get started. | Promoted post
20°

The Co-op Podcast #81: Should Companies Try Harder To Secure 3rd Party Exclusive Titles?

18m ago - Gary Swaby at The Koalition writes: Welcome back to The Co-op podcast. This week Jakejames Lugo,... | PS4