Approvals 10/3 ▼
djtek184 (1) - 4089d ago Cancel
cl1983 (2) - 4089d ago Cancel
rbailey (2) - 4089d ago Cancel
derkasan (2) - 4089d ago Cancel
kratosgdz (1) - 4089d ago Cancel
StrongMan (1) - 4089d ago Cancel
Toadsanime (1) - 4089d ago Cancel
60°

What's Wrong with Halo 4?

Halo 4 is in trouble. At launch, over 500,000 Xbox live subscribers were logged onto the virtual battlegrounds of Halo 4, making for a successful multiplayer experience. However, exactly three months after launch, Halo 4 has dwindled down the Xbox live most played list with Call of Duty: Black Ops II, Minecraft, and Fifa Soccer 13 leading the way now. Halo 4 usually hovers between the fourth or fifth place on the weekly Xbox Live Charts, which is kind of pathetic considering five years ago, Halo 3 ruled the charts with utter domination. It is also not uncommon to see Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 above Halo 4 on the activity charts.

Read Full Story >>
entertainmentfuse.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community4089d ago
StrongMan4089d ago

I've said it before and I'll say it again. Halo 4 just feels outdated. I believe people are tire of the same old game play from over ten years ago and this proves it. Halo needs a change but not too much or you will turn off everyone like what's happening with Gears of War Judgement sitting at only 90k pre orders and the game is only a month away from release. It's a sticky situation for Halo. Stay the same and people lose interest like what's happening with Halo 4 right now, change too much and people will have no interest in it like what's happening with Gears of War Judgement right now.

SJPFTW4088d ago (Edited 4088d ago )

LOL Halo 4 plays like nothing like any of the previous games, especially with the addition of customizable loadouts, armor abilities, sprint and orbital drops. Yah its "outdated" because it does not have aim down the sights and people don't die in 2 hits? Please that is no Halo, and the franchise will die out if that was the case.

Please Sony fanboys should stop pretending they have played the Halo games.

Halo being 4th on Xbox Live is blown out of proportion. There are still 50000+ players on during peak times, finding games is easy.

Uncharted and Killzone don't top the Playstation Network most played, how comes the fanboys don't apply the same logic to them? are they "outdated"? No because popularity does not equal quality.

There is a lot of competition out there, especially when it comes to Online competitive first person shooters. This is not 2007 anymore where Halo was the only good online competitive shooter on consoles. Now you have the Gears, the COD's and the Battlefields. Lots of good games, that equally deserve gamers attentions.

PandemicPrawn04089d ago (Edited 4089d ago )

Nothing wrong with Halo 4.

It's a competitive market, there are heaps of great games competing for gamers attention. I'm currently playing Mass Effect 1 - 3 at the moment, but I will be going back to Spartan Ops and big map slayer when I'm done with Shepard.

Halo is still a huge franchise, but there are a lot of great games out there old and new, exclusive and multiplatform.

Get into them!

Hufandpuf4089d ago

I didn't like Halo 4 compared to previous Halos. Will wait till next year.

Kurt Russell4089d ago

Halo 4 didn't have a good enough variety of play styles. If you didn't use DMR and Boltshot... you weren't playing the best weapon combo. It needs to be overhauled with a balanced class system where different playstyles are welcomed (e.g Battlefield)... that or it needs to go back to its simpler roots of picking a weapon off the ground to appease the old crowd.

IQUITN4G4089d ago

The actual arena combat is still very satisfyingly better than the competition but it's less pick up and play than the likes of Cod. The audience has grown lets not forget and most of these don't like the aspect of wearing players down- Cod is about seeing and shooting in a blink

Show all comments (7)
50°

Master Chief Became More Than A Machine In 343's Halo

In Halo 4, 5, and Infinite, Master Chief became a more nuanced, human character.

In spite of the Halo series’ struggles, 343 deserves praise for adding nuance and characterisation to the ever-beating heart of Halo - The Master Chief. Playing through Infinite, it's abundantly clear that the events of the current and previous trilogies have irrevocably changed the iconic hero. He’s no longer the ‘blank slate’ that was previously presented by Bungie. He’s a fatigued, damaged and fallible protagonist, and one who is meandering through currents of grief, while reveling in his newfound agency. Giving the Chief a compelling and meaningful voice was no small feat, and 343 should be proud of that victory.

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

✔ Fixed
Other
Remove 343 and dev tags as this is about the games not actually about the studio
cl1983406d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
+ Updates (3)- Updates (3)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community405d ago
Changed: content
Changed: content
kingnick405d ago

This article completely misses part of the appeal of the original iteration of character in the original game trilogy. It was the Chief and Cortana vs an entire alien collective. The blank slate Bungie displayed in their games was genius, he was an mysterious hero a wide audience could identify with because he wasn't as clearly defined as most characters.

The books added a lot of lore and backstory but most Halo players just want a fun game with exposition that doesn't get in the way of gameplay, it's why the Cortana level in Halo 3 was derided.

Not every character has to be a damaged soyboy, a soldier has to suck it up and do his duty.

BandarHub404d ago

A lot of people give the 343 version of Master Chief a lot of slack.
But Fundamentally he is still the same character, he just has a couple more dialogues. He has not changed in terms of attitude.
"Not every character has to be a damaged soyboy, a soldier has to suck it up and do his duty."
And that's what he has done at the end of the day, he did his duty. Watch his partner die, and was ready to destroy the weapon in Halo infinite....he is still the same soilder that everyone remembers

Halo Infintes one was a nice balance between both.

slate91404d ago

Chief and the halo franchise became a joke under 343

Sciurus_vulgaris404d ago

The 343i Master Chief has is based on the books. However, in Halo 4-Infinite, the Master Chief overtime become. gradually becomes more willing to show some emotion.

Obscure_Observer404d ago

"However, in Halo 4-Infinite, the Master Chief overtime become. gradually becomes more willing to show some emotion."

Which is awesome! I love how Master Chief become more John and less soldier.

Sciurus_vulgaris404d ago

I didn’t even notice my typos,lol

50°

Halo's Identity Problem Began With an Admirable Mess

It’s a law of nature that eventually, every long-running game franchise will have a particular entry that gets dinged for straying too far from what made it so fun in the first place. Your Super Mario Sunshine, your Dragon Age II, Assassin’s Creed III, and so on. Whether or not that opinion changes more favorably over time, the initial specter of negativity will forever hover it. Microsoft’s Halo is no exception, except that negative specter hasn’t hovered over one particular game, but one whole studio.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community524d ago
The3faces524d ago

True Halo 4 was a sign of 343i's incompetence and the decline of Halo.

180°

10 Years Later, Halo 4 Proves Itself a Disappointing Omen for Halo Infinite

Halo 4 released 10 years ago today, and its disappointing reception was just an omen of things to come with 343 Industries at the helm.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community533d ago
Sonyslave3533d ago (Edited 533d ago )

Halo 4 and infinite have a 87 on metacritic and five a 84🤣. 343i need contents and everything else will play it self out.

ChasterMies532d ago

Halo 4, 5, and Infinite reviews are good examples of the pressure on review sites to score everything between 8-10 out of 10.

ChubbyBlade532d ago

As if reviews scores are any indication of a franchises health.

Halo has been in shambles for YEARS

-Foxtrot533d ago

Halo 4-6 are like the Star Wars sequel trilogy

They all just seem like a brand new games with small connections to the last one but no solid arc connecting them, you’re just told stuff that happened off screen in between the games and nothing makes sense

It’s like they didn’t plan a new trilogy out

CoNn3rB533d ago

That's actually a pretty good way to sum it up

LucasRuinedChildhood533d ago (Edited 533d ago )

I would argue that the new Star Wars trilogy is still better. lol

Most Halo fans would kill for the equivalent of The Force Awakens at this stage (a competent rehash of what came before it). Halo Infinite tried to be that but was undercooked and failed. Halo 4 wasn't that either - they started messing with the formula straight away although the story was okay.

There was nothing particularly compelling about Halo 5's story besides the fake plot they advertised. The Last Jedi is a divisive movie but as RedLetterMedia would say, it was "sporadically interesting" because it tried some new things and set up things that could have been great (like Kylo teaming up with Rey after backstabbing Snoke). That conversation with Yoda is great and it felt like the real Yoda, not that CGI thing in the prequels.
- "Skywalker, still looking to the horizon. Never here, now, hmm? The need in front of your nose."
- "The greatest teacher, failure is ... Luke, we are what they grow beyond. That is the true burden of all masters."
- "That library contained nothing that the girl Rey does not already possess." (because she already took them, haha).

The Rise Of Skywalker is the only one where loads of stuff happens off screen ("Palpatine has returned") in between and nothing makes sense because ... they just needed a main villain and 100 star destroyers to blow up. They could have done something much better.

MrChow666532d ago

no, all disney star wars sucks also disney marvel and everything godamn disney touches

533d ago Replies(3)
Yui_Suzumiya533d ago

Um, didn't Halo 4 have the best campaign out of the new Trilogy? Lol

ChubbyBlade532d ago

Yep and even then it wasn’t very good.

Levii_92533d ago

I'm getting a good gaming laptop soon and i'm finally going to play through the Halo franchise again plus Infinite but i never played Halo 4 before .. can anyone tell me how's the campaign in comparison to the games before it and compared to Halo 5 ?

Stanjara533d ago

Halo 4 campaign great, multi bad.
Halo 5 campaign trash, multi good.

Best Cortana halo 4.

ChubbyBlade532d ago (Edited 532d ago )

Halo 4 was when they started turning it into a “modern” game. Aka taking tips from CoD.

The older titles were sandbox based with weapons that all filled a niche and vehicles that did the same. Open levels with multiple ways to approach in different spots with different weapons etc.

Halo 4/5 doesn’t have that. It’s a linear shooter and nothing else. The story is alright but that’s about it. If it wasn’t a halo game, it would be ok but because it is a halo game, it’s outshone by the previous games.

It’s a hell of a lot better than 5 though. I found infinite pretty meh

Show all comments (25)