290°
Submitted by doctorstrange 526d ago | opinion piece

Should PS4 and Xbox 720 Games Cost More?

The next generation of consoles is looming, and that means a whole new era of video gaming goodness awaits on the PS4 – but will game prices go up again? Daily Reaction’s Seb and Dan answer Greg Etopio’s community question.
-PSLS (Activision Blizzard Inc., Next-Gen, PS3, PS4, Xbox 360, Xbox One)

« 1 2 »
fluffydelusions  +   526d ago
No. I suspect next games will look similar to how games like say crysis 3 or far cry 3 on PC look maxed out or close to it. If those games cost $60 now I see no reason why that should change.
#1 (Edited 526d ago ) | Agree(48) | Disagree(5) | Report | Reply
aceitman  +   526d ago
they already milk us for dlc some more than others .
fluffydelusions  +   526d ago
Can't argue with that. But I dunno...can you imagine paying $70 + tax for a game at retail (not including dlc)? Not sure many people could get behind that. If that were to happen I don't think I would be doing many day 1 purchases next gen. That or I'd just stick to PC exclusively and steam sales lol.
#1.1.1 (Edited 526d ago ) | Agree(13) | Disagree(1) | Report
Hydrolex  +   526d ago
Not more than 500 bucks !
LOGICWINS  +   526d ago
I'd pay $70 if these games came with a season pass for all future DLC.
yeahokchief  +   526d ago
1. They already charge $90 when you buy the DLC.

2. If they increase the base price that's fine with me, but i want the DLC to become less expensive to make up for that.

3. If both base price and dlc prices increase then i will not buy as many games or will find a less expensive hobby.

4. I vote to get rid of second hand games/used games before raising prices and i vote with my wallet.
#1.1.4 (Edited 526d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(10) | Report
rainslacker  +   526d ago
In the end it will be the same as it was for this generation. The market will decide what the actual cost of the games will be.

If games come out at $70, while possibly a fair price given rising costs, the market may not be able to sustain that price because people may not be willing to pay that much. If a majority of the people accept the increased price then expect a majority of games to be priced at this point, just like it's been this gen.

If there is a significant decline in game sales because of the increased price, which is reasonable to assume, then the publishers will rethink that price, and likely development on those titles will change, or other methods will be devised to recoup more of the initial investment.

The $60 games were pushing it this gen...$50 seemed to be a sweet spot in the prior gen...and well $60 was only $10 more, despite development costs rising significantly compared to previous gens. That significant rise won't exist this time, although there will be an increase in dev costs, just not as much respective to this gens shift.
donman1  +   526d ago
NO!!!
HELLSAINT258PPS  +   526d ago
If they do, I'm out!
cyguration  +   526d ago
Perfectly said.
deSSy2724  +   526d ago
Yeah but....

Lets see... Dead Space 3:

60$ + 11 DAY-ONE DLCs (110$ combined).

THATS 170$ DAMN IT, expensive as hell.
#1.4 (Edited 526d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
mochachino  +   526d ago
No next-gen games will have next gen engines. Current PC games are just HD 60 FPS versions of console games with better textures and lighting.

Next-gen engines will make console games look fairly different than current PC games.
DeadlyFire  +   526d ago
you are aware that next generation engines are built from the ground up on a PC first right? Okay I was just checking.
hotrider12  +   526d ago
unfortunately i think ps4 games prabably be around 69.99 79.99 if games come close like CRYSIS 3
I feel no one is willing to pay 70 or 80.00 for one game. 160(80) for 2 games?? 140 (70) for 2 games?
#1.6 (Edited 526d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
Cocozero  +   526d ago
If Sony/MS wanted to go all digital in the future they would add $10 to the disk versions and make the digital version around $15/$20 cheaper to encourage DD adoption.
adorie  +   526d ago
Great thinking. But I still enjoy my physical copy. It will be hard to take away from that without leaving *me* feeling empty.. quite literally.
Jakens  +   526d ago
Test Drive Unlimited was $40 on day one. And a great $40 at that
jc48573  +   526d ago
if the price does go up, I will have to be even more selective when it comes to buying games.
Foolsjoker  +   526d ago
I think games could go up $5 without it being too big of a problem.
fluffydelusions  +   526d ago
Appropriate username for that comment :P
j-blaze  +   526d ago
simply NO!
dbjj12088  +   526d ago
No! They're already expensive enough compared to movies, iPhone games, etc.
Qrphe  +   526d ago
Games used to cost more before actually (account for inflation). But they'll have very little luck convincing the masses that a raise would be fair.

Plus as mentioned above already, they have to compete against other industries including the mobile gaming sector.
#7 (Edited 526d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
rainslacker  +   526d ago
True, some games were actually quite expensive on release. They also fluctuated somewhat depending on memory prices or tech built into the cartridges and stuff.

One major difference though is that there wasn't an accepted MSRP that existed across the board for all games. A games length and quality were often reflected in the actual price of the game, outside a few exceptions of course. This just isn't the case anymore, and again, outside of some exceptions, all games are priced the same, even though it's obvious they didn't cost anywhere near as much to produce.

I like Sony's move with Sly Cooper being reflective of actual dev costs for the game. It shows that they want to sell the game and make a modest profit, instead of gouging the consumer up front. They also know that given the DLC stuff for it that they can make a better profit if more people actually have the game. Hell, this tactic is obvious in PS+ instant game collection, as some 3rd parties are willing to give their game away for free in hopes of DLC revenue, after all some revenue is better than none.

Consumers can be savvy creatures, and it's best to not disillusion them in the short term to ensure long term success.
#7.1 (Edited 526d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
yewles1  +   526d ago
NO!!!!!
hazardman  +   526d ago
NOOOO...... Games are to expensive now. I'm paying $64 for a new game plus DLC. I think that games should be $30 seeing as we end up buying the rest of it thru DLC.
Jakens  +   526d ago
It won't happen right away. Wait until there is a large user base of 720 and PS4 owers and then do it. Better yet, let Capcom decide when games should be $70 each.

First show me these improvements that more expensive games will bring.

Wait, um, maybe a note to publishers: make three versions of each of your games. $50 $60 and $70

I know that last part will never fly.
pr0t0typeknuckles  +   526d ago
UH hell no, isnt $60 already asking to much especially when you consider that we dont even get a full game nowadays.
Ray186  +   526d ago
Sometimes it seems like they are doing everything that they can to kill the industry.
chadwarden  +   526d ago
Yes because I like to spend more money on games than I have to.
Stedron  +   526d ago
NO
Simon_Brezhnev  +   526d ago
Before i buy the ps4 if the games are indeed $70. I'm not going to waste my time and just go to pc gaming.
GribbleGrunger  +   526d ago
Nope. It cost a lot more to make Avatar than Atonement, but it cost me the same to get in to see them at the cinema. Price of entry should have nothing to do with the cost of the end product. A film is a film and a game is a game.
Krew_92  +   526d ago
Ugh just like how crappy games come out with a $60 price tag too.

I'm looking at all those crappy movie to game adaptations.

Nowadays though games have been coming out in tiers, such as Vita games. Some are $40 and others $50.
#17.1 (Edited 526d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
rainslacker  +   526d ago
@Krew

Yeah, I like the tiered structure a lot more than $60 across the board.

However, a while back one publisher(can't remember who) said that they believed when people saw a game priced lower than others then they immediately though it to be a inferior product. While I don't necessarily think this myself, I do think that that perception does exist. On the other hand I felt that that statement taken by itself was just a cop-out, and most games should have been priced based on their dev costs and quality, as well as priced better for their intended market.

I'm interested to know how Sly Cooper's price cut affected sales. It was pretty significant, and was pretty surprising given that a lot of people were anticipating the game. If it received very good sales then that could pave the way for better pricing tiers in the future.
MasterCornholio  +   526d ago
No.
Jek_Porkins  +   526d ago
Since they are all going to be on Blu Ray and it isn't super new tech anymore, games should remain the same price that they are right now. Funny thing is, I actually remember paying more for games on the N64 than I do right now, Jet Force Gemini was like $70...
Soldierone  +   526d ago
Why? Most games now cost 110 dollars to get all of the content, why do they need to raise the entrance fee even more? Makes no sense.

60 dollars + 15 dollar DLC (5 or more times) = way too much as is. And yet they cry about sales on a daily basis.
clintagious650  +   526d ago
The only way I see the price going up is if games from these next consoles cost devs more to create & since pc games already are a step ahead of these new consoles in all around stats & have games already being created for it & price isnt changing then i dont see why the price would even go up at all. That is why dlc is there for devs to make extra cash on top of the money we already spent buying their games.

Edit: If devs want to really get their money, they should try an create their games knowing what made their game successful in the first place. Im talking to u Capcom with RE6 which was a disappointment in my opinion. Too much action & not even a scary game anymore. Heck fallout 3 was scarier lol.
#21 (Edited 526d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
Gamer-Z  +   526d ago
They should cost less if they implement used game blocking technology
TrendyGamers  +   526d ago
Should? No. Will? Possibly.
BitbyDeath  +   526d ago
No, they're still using Blu-ray which has come down in price since PS3 was first released so if anything it should be cheaper. Staying the same is no problem either tho
ACEMANWISE  +   526d ago
The prices should be a little higher than rental prices. That's basically what we're getting given the state of control over software this gen. The terms and conditions are pretty clear on what video games should be worth to the consumer. Read them.
dcbronco  +   526d ago
If publishers had any sense they would be stressing the tools used to make games. I won't pay more than $60 and based on the number of people moaning about blocking used games many other won't either. Publishers might price themselves out of the market if they get too greedy.
Wedge19  +   526d ago
I sure as hell hope not. Lower prices would equal a larger amount of purchases, which would ultimately equate to more money for the developer, one would hope. It's better to have 5 people buy your game at $40 than to have 2 people buy your game at $60.
rainslacker  +   526d ago
Not necessarily true. Take this overly simplified example for instance.

Say the game cost them $30 per unit sold to produce, then they receive a profit of $50 for 5 copies sold at $40. But they receive $60 profit for 2 copies sold at $60. Factoring in things like distribution, packaging costs, etc, can mean even more profit at that $60 cost, since it would cost them less to move less units.

Some of this varies, given that dev costs are fixed and not really a per unit thing, but the principle still remains. It's a pretty fundamental part of retail economics.
ps3_pwns  +   526d ago
the only right anwser here is no! so anyone who did not say no are wrong.
gamingzen  +   526d ago
Personally i think game prices should go down say £25-£30 the reason i say this people will buy more games also make them cheap enough and people will be less likely to pirate games as a new copy is cheap enough
gamingzen  +   526d ago
Make games to expensive and piracy will increase and the whole industry will suffer then.
Studio-YaMi  +   526d ago
Although I'm against piracy but I do agree with your statement,people(especially teenagers) want to be able to afford the games they want to play and enjoy,raising the cost of games will only hurt the gaming industry in return.
#30.1 (Edited 526d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
leogets  +   526d ago
and their parents xD
« 1 2 »

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
20°

Big Action Mega Fight!'s new premium pricing is a knockout, dev no longer making F2P games

6m ago - "Double Stallion decided to get rid of the free to play model in its Bronze Award-winning brawler... | iPhone
30°

Sportsball: Combative Couch Co-op

8m ago - Birds will fly. Hearts will soar. Be the Hero your team needs. Sportsball! Sportsball! Sportsball... | PC
20°

Destiny checks all the boxes - but is it enough?

9m ago - Chalgyr's Game Room writes: The amount of press that Destiny is garnering is almost overwhelmi... | Xbox 360
20°

How To Unlock The MPX Submachine Gun In Battlefield 4

14m ago - Here is how to unlock the MPX in BF4 Dragon’s Teeth. To unlock the MPX Submachine Gun you need to... | PC
Ad

Start Making Games for the PS4

Now - Want to design the next generation of video games? Start learning game design today. Click for more info on how to get started. | Promoted post
10°

Worms Battlegrounds Review | Game Podunk

15m ago - GP: "Definitely grab Worms Battlegrounds if you love the series and have buddies to play with. If... | PS4