290°
Submitted by doctorstrange 832d ago | opinion piece

Should PS4 and Xbox 720 Games Cost More?

The next generation of consoles is looming, and that means a whole new era of video gaming goodness awaits on the PS4 – but will game prices go up again? Daily Reaction’s Seb and Dan answer Greg Etopio’s community question.
-PSLS (Activision Blizzard Inc., Next-Gen, PS3, PS4, Xbox 360, Xbox One)

« 1 2 »
fluffydelusions  +   832d ago
No. I suspect next games will look similar to how games like say crysis 3 or far cry 3 on PC look maxed out or close to it. If those games cost $60 now I see no reason why that should change.
#1 (Edited 832d ago ) | Agree(48) | Disagree(5) | Report | Reply
aceitman  +   832d ago
they already milk us for dlc some more than others .
fluffydelusions  +   832d ago
Can't argue with that. But I dunno...can you imagine paying $70 + tax for a game at retail (not including dlc)? Not sure many people could get behind that. If that were to happen I don't think I would be doing many day 1 purchases next gen. That or I'd just stick to PC exclusively and steam sales lol.
#1.1.1 (Edited 832d ago ) | Agree(13) | Disagree(1) | Report
Hydrolex  +   832d ago
Not more than 500 bucks !
LOGICWINS  +   832d ago
I'd pay $70 if these games came with a season pass for all future DLC.
yeahokchief  +   832d ago
1. They already charge $90 when you buy the DLC.

2. If they increase the base price that's fine with me, but i want the DLC to become less expensive to make up for that.

3. If both base price and dlc prices increase then i will not buy as many games or will find a less expensive hobby.

4. I vote to get rid of second hand games/used games before raising prices and i vote with my wallet.
#1.1.4 (Edited 832d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(10) | Report
rainslacker  +   832d ago
In the end it will be the same as it was for this generation. The market will decide what the actual cost of the games will be.

If games come out at $70, while possibly a fair price given rising costs, the market may not be able to sustain that price because people may not be willing to pay that much. If a majority of the people accept the increased price then expect a majority of games to be priced at this point, just like it's been this gen.

If there is a significant decline in game sales because of the increased price, which is reasonable to assume, then the publishers will rethink that price, and likely development on those titles will change, or other methods will be devised to recoup more of the initial investment.

The $60 games were pushing it this gen...$50 seemed to be a sweet spot in the prior gen...and well $60 was only $10 more, despite development costs rising significantly compared to previous gens. That significant rise won't exist this time, although there will be an increase in dev costs, just not as much respective to this gens shift.
donman1  +   832d ago
NO!!!
HELLSAINT258PPS  +   832d ago
If they do, I'm out!
cyguration  +   832d ago
Perfectly said.
deSSy2724  +   832d ago
Yeah but....

Lets see... Dead Space 3:

60$ + 11 DAY-ONE DLCs (110$ combined).

THATS 170$ DAMN IT, expensive as hell.
#1.4 (Edited 832d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
mochachino  +   832d ago
No next-gen games will have next gen engines. Current PC games are just HD 60 FPS versions of console games with better textures and lighting.

Next-gen engines will make console games look fairly different than current PC games.
DeadlyFire  +   831d ago
you are aware that next generation engines are built from the ground up on a PC first right? Okay I was just checking.
hotrider12  +   831d ago
unfortunately i think ps4 games prabably be around 69.99 79.99 if games come close like CRYSIS 3
I feel no one is willing to pay 70 or 80.00 for one game. 160(80) for 2 games?? 140 (70) for 2 games?
#1.6 (Edited 831d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
Cocozero  +   832d ago
If Sony/MS wanted to go all digital in the future they would add $10 to the disk versions and make the digital version around $15/$20 cheaper to encourage DD adoption.
adorie  +   832d ago
Great thinking. But I still enjoy my physical copy. It will be hard to take away from that without leaving *me* feeling empty.. quite literally.
Jakens  +   831d ago
Test Drive Unlimited was $40 on day one. And a great $40 at that
jc48573  +   832d ago
if the price does go up, I will have to be even more selective when it comes to buying games.
Foolsjoker  +   832d ago
I think games could go up $5 without it being too big of a problem.
fluffydelusions  +   832d ago
Appropriate username for that comment :P
j-blaze  +   832d ago
simply NO!
dbjj12088  +   832d ago
No! They're already expensive enough compared to movies, iPhone games, etc.
Qrphe  +   832d ago
Games used to cost more before actually (account for inflation). But they'll have very little luck convincing the masses that a raise would be fair.

Plus as mentioned above already, they have to compete against other industries including the mobile gaming sector.
#7 (Edited 832d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
rainslacker  +   832d ago
True, some games were actually quite expensive on release. They also fluctuated somewhat depending on memory prices or tech built into the cartridges and stuff.

One major difference though is that there wasn't an accepted MSRP that existed across the board for all games. A games length and quality were often reflected in the actual price of the game, outside a few exceptions of course. This just isn't the case anymore, and again, outside of some exceptions, all games are priced the same, even though it's obvious they didn't cost anywhere near as much to produce.

I like Sony's move with Sly Cooper being reflective of actual dev costs for the game. It shows that they want to sell the game and make a modest profit, instead of gouging the consumer up front. They also know that given the DLC stuff for it that they can make a better profit if more people actually have the game. Hell, this tactic is obvious in PS+ instant game collection, as some 3rd parties are willing to give their game away for free in hopes of DLC revenue, after all some revenue is better than none.

Consumers can be savvy creatures, and it's best to not disillusion them in the short term to ensure long term success.
#7.1 (Edited 832d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
yewles1  +   832d ago
NO!!!!!
hazardman  +   832d ago
NOOOO...... Games are to expensive now. I'm paying $64 for a new game plus DLC. I think that games should be $30 seeing as we end up buying the rest of it thru DLC.
Jakens  +   832d ago
It won't happen right away. Wait until there is a large user base of 720 and PS4 owers and then do it. Better yet, let Capcom decide when games should be $70 each.

First show me these improvements that more expensive games will bring.

Wait, um, maybe a note to publishers: make three versions of each of your games. $50 $60 and $70

I know that last part will never fly.
pr0t0typeknuckles  +   832d ago
UH hell no, isnt $60 already asking to much especially when you consider that we dont even get a full game nowadays.
Ray186  +   832d ago
Sometimes it seems like they are doing everything that they can to kill the industry.
chadwarden  +   832d ago
Yes because I like to spend more money on games than I have to.
Stedron  +   832d ago
NO
Simon_Brezhnev  +   832d ago
Before i buy the ps4 if the games are indeed $70. I'm not going to waste my time and just go to pc gaming.
GribbleGrunger  +   832d ago
Nope. It cost a lot more to make Avatar than Atonement, but it cost me the same to get in to see them at the cinema. Price of entry should have nothing to do with the cost of the end product. A film is a film and a game is a game.
Krew_92  +   832d ago
Ugh just like how crappy games come out with a $60 price tag too.

I'm looking at all those crappy movie to game adaptations.

Nowadays though games have been coming out in tiers, such as Vita games. Some are $40 and others $50.
#17.1 (Edited 832d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
rainslacker  +   832d ago
@Krew

Yeah, I like the tiered structure a lot more than $60 across the board.

However, a while back one publisher(can't remember who) said that they believed when people saw a game priced lower than others then they immediately though it to be a inferior product. While I don't necessarily think this myself, I do think that that perception does exist. On the other hand I felt that that statement taken by itself was just a cop-out, and most games should have been priced based on their dev costs and quality, as well as priced better for their intended market.

I'm interested to know how Sly Cooper's price cut affected sales. It was pretty significant, and was pretty surprising given that a lot of people were anticipating the game. If it received very good sales then that could pave the way for better pricing tiers in the future.
MasterCornholio  +   832d ago
No.
Jek_Porkins  +   832d ago
Since they are all going to be on Blu Ray and it isn't super new tech anymore, games should remain the same price that they are right now. Funny thing is, I actually remember paying more for games on the N64 than I do right now, Jet Force Gemini was like $70...
Soldierone  +   832d ago
Why? Most games now cost 110 dollars to get all of the content, why do they need to raise the entrance fee even more? Makes no sense.

60 dollars + 15 dollar DLC (5 or more times) = way too much as is. And yet they cry about sales on a daily basis.
clintagious650  +   832d ago
The only way I see the price going up is if games from these next consoles cost devs more to create & since pc games already are a step ahead of these new consoles in all around stats & have games already being created for it & price isnt changing then i dont see why the price would even go up at all. That is why dlc is there for devs to make extra cash on top of the money we already spent buying their games.

Edit: If devs want to really get their money, they should try an create their games knowing what made their game successful in the first place. Im talking to u Capcom with RE6 which was a disappointment in my opinion. Too much action & not even a scary game anymore. Heck fallout 3 was scarier lol.
#21 (Edited 832d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
Gamer-Z  +   832d ago
They should cost less if they implement used game blocking technology
TrendyGamers  +   832d ago
Should? No. Will? Possibly.
BitbyDeath  +   832d ago
No, they're still using Blu-ray which has come down in price since PS3 was first released so if anything it should be cheaper. Staying the same is no problem either tho
ACEMANWISE  +   832d ago
The prices should be a little higher than rental prices. That's basically what we're getting given the state of control over software this gen. The terms and conditions are pretty clear on what video games should be worth to the consumer. Read them.
dcbronco  +   832d ago
If publishers had any sense they would be stressing the tools used to make games. I won't pay more than $60 and based on the number of people moaning about blocking used games many other won't either. Publishers might price themselves out of the market if they get too greedy.
Wedge19  +   832d ago
I sure as hell hope not. Lower prices would equal a larger amount of purchases, which would ultimately equate to more money for the developer, one would hope. It's better to have 5 people buy your game at $40 than to have 2 people buy your game at $60.
rainslacker  +   832d ago
Not necessarily true. Take this overly simplified example for instance.

Say the game cost them $30 per unit sold to produce, then they receive a profit of $50 for 5 copies sold at $40. But they receive $60 profit for 2 copies sold at $60. Factoring in things like distribution, packaging costs, etc, can mean even more profit at that $60 cost, since it would cost them less to move less units.

Some of this varies, given that dev costs are fixed and not really a per unit thing, but the principle still remains. It's a pretty fundamental part of retail economics.
ps3_pwns  +   832d ago
the only right anwser here is no! so anyone who did not say no are wrong.
gamingzen  +   832d ago
Personally i think game prices should go down say £25-£30 the reason i say this people will buy more games also make them cheap enough and people will be less likely to pirate games as a new copy is cheap enough
gamingzen  +   832d ago
Make games to expensive and piracy will increase and the whole industry will suffer then.
Studio-YaMi  +   832d ago
Although I'm against piracy but I do agree with your statement,people(especially teenagers) want to be able to afford the games they want to play and enjoy,raising the cost of games will only hurt the gaming industry in return.
#30.1 (Edited 832d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
leogets  +   831d ago
and their parents xD
« 1 2 »

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
40°

First Potential Image of AMD's Radeon 390X Has Surfaced

3h ago - The first photo for AMD's new flagship Radeon graphics card has popped up online, showcasing an i... | PC
30°

This custom-made Ice Climbers amiibo is impressive

3h ago - Reddit user “mast3r_sword” has come up with an incredibly impressive custom amiibo. The Ice Climb... | Wii U
Ad

See what games are coming out in 2015

Now - Visit our release calendar to see what games are coming out in 2015. | Promoted post
40°

Controller Clipz are coming to save your controllers and keep them safe

4h ago - The Outerhaven writes: Have you’ve ever run into the issue where you simply don’t have any place... | PS4
30°

Lost Dimension's Brawling Gentlewoman and American Samurai Get a New Trailer

5h ago - There comes a time when -- despite your enemies being armed to the teeth with high-tech rifles, d... | PS3
20°

Space, Air, and Tires in this Week's Gaming Deals

5h ago - Continue Play's round-up of deals and steals in gaming this week. | Culture