110°

Project CARS keeps getting better and better; new community screenshots released

DSOGaming writes: "It’s been a while since our last pCars gallery, no? Thankfully, Slightly Mad Studios has released a new set of community screenshots for its upcoming racer. Project CARS looks spectacular, especially when using the SweetFX tool, and as always the following shots show purely in-game footage that has not been made in any special photo mode with no post-processing or filters that aren’t available during the actual gameplay. Enjoy!"

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
Perjoss4092d ago

015.jpg has some pretty insane detail going on there.

also...

"as always the following shots show purely in-game footage that has not been made in any special photo mode with no post-processing or filters that aren’t available during the actual gameplay."

:)

ProjectVulcan4092d ago (Edited 4092d ago )

The engine doesn't half toss some polygons about. Wheels look like.....round :o even up close.

Shadows look like...shadows. Not crawling low res blocks.

The closest racer to photorealism. It does show diminishing returns though, much more power and then photorealism will be possible in racing games at least. We are very close now. I can't see it being more than another 3-4 years before we see a racer indistinguisable from real life in screens.

Probably a sequel to this game on PC? Bets on now.

Deputydon4091d ago

I seem to be the only person that is 50/50 on this game. Some screen shots look absolutely astonishing to me, while others look bad. Some of the screen shots just give that instant, "oh, it's just a video game vibe" while other you have to stare at before you can determine whether it's a game or real life.

chukamachine4092d ago

Very close to GT5 in most respects.

Probably has better shadows though.

Project cars still has cheap tree's though.

I think it also shows how far graphically GT5 was pushed, sure some area's could have been a lot better. But lighting/car shaders/premium models are second to none.

I bet this game only runs at 30fps on consoles though.

givemeshelter4092d ago

Are you serious chukamachine? No. I knew you were kidding with that post. Good one though...You had us there for a second thinking GT5 looks even close to this...Good one!!! :-O

SPAM-FRITTER-1234092d ago

ROFL. Ill have 2 of what ever you are smoking.

GT5 looks better? BAHAHAHA

Animal Mutha 764092d ago

Hehe - your joking right????

I actually laughed - seriously, I got funny looks from across the room.

Just give me this game on a next gen console or let me win the lottery to afford to update my pc to run this at 60fps.

Me-Time4092d ago (Edited 4092d ago )

Reaching too far, chukamachine, but the Nurbugring's tracks look a lot better than the Nordschleife in pCARS.

What the hell though? The gameplay in pCARS uses post-processing filter(s) as a default setting. You're given the ability to turn it off, so let's see those screenshots.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4092d ago
Loki864092d ago

Clearly all PC footage, but it looks breathtaking. I like all the different forms of racing they are incorporating. Will definitely keep my eyes on this one.

Bordel_19004092d ago (Edited 4092d ago )

These pictures look really very good. But... all the footage I've seen the last month from pCars don't look even close to these pictures.

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

I've always thought from what I've seen of pCars that it looks kinda rough. If I comapare the HD-videos I've seen of pCars on Youtube to GT5 they're pretty close. I think a game like Assetto Corsa looks much better from what I've seen.

170°

Why did EA Kill Project CARS?

This video explains why we think Electronic Arts didn't see a future in the sim racing title Project CARS and promptly cancelled the fourth instalment.

Jin_Sakai528d ago

After the last installment I’d say most hardcore fans left. It’s just not that good anymore so I can’t really blame EA this time.

masterfox528d ago

because it was always a project and it never got finished :D

ChubbyBlade526d ago

Every game is a project. Your joke doesn’t make sense

InUrFoxHole526d ago

It makes perfect sense. It's obviously a play on the title. Jesus christ you must be a blast at parties.

ApocalypseShadow527d ago (Edited 527d ago )

Ask Bullfrog or Black Box or Tiburon or Studio 33 or Criterion or any of the previously acquired developers who made racing games as competition, or as developers of EA games, then eventually dissolved into oblivion or reassigned. Just ask them. They'll tell you why.

ApocalypseShadow526d ago

Oh. I forgot. Even Code Masters were absorbed into Criterion. Another racing developer EA took over.

Every racing developer either absorbed by EA or eventually destroyed by them. They either kill competition or have them in the end make Need 4 Speed for them.

MadLad526d ago

EA only cancels projects for one reason.
They didn't see enough money in it.

Kombatologist526d ago (Edited 526d ago )

Not when it's because it didn't meet some crazy margin. It's like if something doesn't make EA a billion dollars on day one (I'm exaggerating that figure of course), they swiftly put it out to pasture.

SurgicalMenace526d ago (Edited 526d ago )

Much like if you're spending money on what's a bad investment for your desired goals, you'd do away with it, if you're wise. We should try to get away from thinking we know more about business than individuals that have been doing it for decades. Perhaps you could benefit from going into business instead of wasting all of your talents in comment sections. It's clear that you're the missing piece that EA's been looking for.

MadLad525d ago

I've made a good amount of money betting on underdog investments over the years.

EA sets unrealistic expectations of their more niche developers, yet continue to fund absolute blunders like DICE and the Battlefield series year after year.

dumahim526d ago

EA butted in and messed with the formula and act shocked when it doesn't work out.

Show all comments (16)
90°

Original Project CARS creator trying to re-hire EA team

Ian Bell, the founder of Slightly Mad Studios, is aiming to hire former Project CARS employees to work on his upcoming GTR Revival project.

Sgt_Slaughter530d ago

If it's just going to be another sim-cade that doesn't do either one correctly then no thanks.

Project CARS 2 was a step in the right direction but the physics still aren't where they should have been, so what did they do for PC3? Go completely arcade. That killed the franchise.

220°

EA dropping Project CARS

From GI.biz: "EA is dropping Project CARS, GamesIndustry.biz can reveal.

The Slightly Mad Studios-developed series was launched in 2015, with EA confirming today that it has made the decision to "stop further development and investment" in the franchise.

The announcement was made internally and it's unclear at this stage to which extent staff could be affected. EA said that employees working on Project CARS will be moved into "suitable" roles "wherever [they] can.""

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
Terry_B532d ago

Typical for EA. They buy studios that created nice games..and are sooner or later destroying them and move the people to work on the old same 5+ EA series.

italiangamer532d ago

They will put the developers on the 1000th Need for Speed for the rest of their entire careers, just like Criterion.

SurgicalMenace531d ago

To be fair, it's not EAs fault it falls directly on the consumer. Everytime these companies choose to drop a series they're met with backlash though the gamers didn't support said series enough to justify its continuation. Attempting to paint every company as evil all because they're in it to succeed is ridiculous. They have to make money just like each of us typing in this section. If a job wasn't supporting you well you'd quit and find a new one, this is the same mentality concerning series.

TheColbertinator531d ago

@SurgicalMenace

No it is their fault. They don't listen to fans and burn the franchise to the ground by introducing elements that nobody wanted instead of increasing support for said respected franchises.

I order a steak, they make a steak. 1st sale
I order a steak again, they vomit on my steak and charge me more for it. No sale.

EA in a nutshell.

Tapani531d ago

@TheColbinator Well how do you think they make the billions then?

Their fans ARE buying their games. You are just not their focus group, and I can guarantee their customer insights team is more thorough and detailed in their reaearch than any N4G commentors’ opinion on the matter. Otherwise EA would not exist as a company, and they’d be bankrupt.

deleted531d ago

The one that still hurts the most though was Criterion w the Burnout series. Acquired Criterion's tech for their own existing IP, then shut em down. It's basically parasitic. I sure do miss Burnout's crash mode!

Hofstaderman531d ago

Sounds eerily similar to another large unnamed corporation hey. I believe some EA bigwigs shifted to that company back in the day, would explain the similarities.

rlow1531d ago

Must be talking about Sony

peppeaccardo532d ago

and instead they come out with that piece of shit of Need for Speed which looks like an Anna & Barbera cartoon. C'mon .... PC2 was my go to game for VR racing and the first one i played for tens of hours. i was so lookiing forward to PC4 after that failure of PC3 ... what a shame EA, they are bombing all the good games and stick to the garbage ones. EA when you think you have reached maximum of disappointment they top it off with style .... screw them!

SurgicalMenace531d ago

Need for Speed continues to sell so why would they get rid of what's producing what they need to maintain stability?

EazyC532d ago

What they did to this series was idiotic. The premise was great -- a sim/simcade game that GENUINELY got developed in line with its community. There is a huge gap in the market for this...I mean, PD hasn't listened to fans at all over the last year with regard to simple Gran Turismo 7 tweaks. Sim racing fans are screaming for a title where they actually give a shit about their users.

Project Cars 2 was genuinely on to something, it just needed some refinement. But instead they followed up by selling off to EA with a braindead GRID clone with Project Cars 3. Again...idiotic.

SurgicalMenace531d ago

Well since you're the authority on properly managing a million dollar company, why don't you just call them to let them know of your divine wisdom?

Hardcore sim racers are the ones who are competing acrossed the globe, no company in their right mind would focus on a forever moving casual market. They have to focus on those dedicated to supporting their efforts. Notice how you're speaking from a perspective of self opposed to the collective. Perhaps they sold out because they, like us, needed the money knowing that they could reinvest it into something new. PC was a decent racer but very few people mainlined it over GT or Forza.

EazyC531d ago

I'm not a divine authority but I notice a pattern where these huge corporations turn completely tone deaf of what the "average fan" wants.

vallencer531d ago

Hate to break it to you but project cars 3 was published by Bandai in 2020. EA didn't buy codemasters, which owned slightly mad studios, until 2021. Either way the sales were super poor for the game and it's not surprising EA would just drop the game. BUT it still sucks because it's one less sim racing game on the market. Especially because the first 2 were really good.

Tzuno531d ago

and focuses more on cartoon network games

Show all comments (19)