Alex C.: ''If Microsoft are to lock games down to a single user and require an always-on internet connection, then Sony have everything to gain from what has to be a considerable misstep from Redmond that’s likely to cost them a good share of the next-gen pie. It sounds almost ridiculous – copy protection gone too far – but that’s what rumours are suggesting today.
But first, some balance. Whilst the sources are apparently solid (“we’re confident they are,” Edge tell us) I’m still struggling to consider that the two main factors – tying a game to one individual and needed a constant green light from your router – aren’t just options available to the publisher or developer. Like region locking, for example.
Surely Microsoft isn’t crazy enough to enforce such systematic restrictions on every Xbox 720 game they rubber stamp. I can’t see that happening.''
http://n4g.com/news/1168888...
So if Microsoft go through with this......things could get interesting
You know, lest we forget, we're talking about 2 completely different companies here.
One company offers online gaming for free, and their subscription model gives you free games. And the other company makes you pay to play online content which you've already paid for with the game purchase.
The point of the online pass was so that Sony actually made some money from used games. Because that was their big issue with used games. They make no money from them whatsoever. It's purely profit for retailers. But the online pass scheme helps amend that and it actually supports the existence of used games in the future.
Online passes will likely carry on into the ps4 life cycle, Sony make some money from used games, Sony keeps its good relationship with retailers, and the customers can keep their used games. It's win win. Because of the existence of online passes now, there's really little reason to block used game sales
Yeah and the other company closes a studio after one failed game that the publisher failed to advertise.
the thing that the 720 will completely block used games is still just a rumor, right?
so, what's the point of jumping our guns over this when things haven't even materialized yet?
http://i.imgur.com/XGRrpqQ....
Neither one is going to give the other such a massive advantage. Either both will do it or neither will do it.
As for the Sony patent, they also had a similar patent when PS3 launched that never saw the light of day. Patents mean nothing.
not on an individuals, so we are still free to share are games.
You can buy a used old games for $20. No one is going to buy old games for $60 to $70(next gen?). Only a wishful fanboy would run around screaming doom to one console or the other believing a company would do this.
The only way a company could block used games is if they lowered the price of games and or games prices were set by the industry lowing at a set pace with time.
EDIT
LOL a disagree
No one would be interested in a Launch title after owning a console for 6 years and pay full price for it LOL
No one finds it odd an explosion of pro Sony propaganda is coming out and false anti MSFT news in response to exciting MSFT news originally?(leaked 720 docs/specs etc)
How Sony's “No Second-Hand Games” System Gives Microsoft The Upper Hand.
You see, it go either way, and wouldn't do any console gamer any good. Blocking used games is extremely ridiculous for both Sony and MS. so whats the point of this article again? Seeing how this a interchangeable Opinion Piece?
sony also filed a patent for the exact same thing before the PS3 launched, and last i checked we can still play second-hand/rented games on our PS3s.
the reality about patents is that most of them don't even see the light of day.
i doubt that MS or sony would implement anything to block second-hand games, and until we get confirmation from the actual source (and not some hack of a gaming "journalist"), everyone's panties should stay un-bunched.
But in all honesty you will still have people that will gobble this up and buy a PS4 or 720 regardless...people are starved out for the Halo 5 and Uncharted 4.
People said the same thing about DLC that if it ever became the norm they will stop buying consoles and they said the same thing about online passes...people talk smack now but if MS and SONY both announce that they will be blocking used games the sheep will still buy come launch.
PC gaming will raise even more since nothing can stop us, DRM tries to mess with us frequently and they always fail !!!!
If MS and Sony just were like, let's both do that, and do it...well, it's done.
unless one backs out last minute and be like, OMG THEY BLOCKED USED GAMES, WE DIDNT!
http://www.edge-online.com/...
That'd be a laugh.
1. http://www.videogamer.com/n...
And that one day extra comment is pathetic, why should Sonys schedule dictates MS's? Plus it was said 4 years ago.
Also seeing as everyone is hurting in terms of how much they should be selling recently it is always possible in the future everyone one including Nintendo could pick up on this blocking second hand games thing.
Sales are just in the crapper and people are going to have to keep their money tight somehow.
In short I'm much more favorable of small than drastic steps. It's the developers/publishers losing money on used sales, not the console makers
A
Rumor..
Like any rumor, I'd disregard it until an official statement. Most likely, websites come up with this stuff for hits on their websites..
What's funny is when the rumors were about PS4 Sony guys defended Sony. Since then Sony guys have been attacking MSFT for it after certain media has turned the rumor on MSFT again. Now Sony guys seemed to realize what you said and suddenly remember Sony has always be interested in this in the past and as of late. LOL
I can't belive the difference between this article and the hottest story on the front page(despite some of the same posters in here being the same in here or agree-ers of anti MSFT comments in the other article)
I hope it is not true and both consoles will allow second hand used games. If Microsoft decides to do it and not Sony, I will change my user name to XDF (Xbox Defense Force) Repellent and support Sony full time and dump Microsoft in a heart beat.
and that's exactly what they'd have to be to actually do this.
not because i think they care about their customers or anything, because as far as i can see we're just an exploitable resource to them, that applies to sony too, and probably nintendo.
but to do this would piss off too large a percentage of the gamer population.
they weathered the rrod, mostly because people had already become invested in the machine by the time it really hit.
they wouldn't weather this though, because people would know from day one.
as for me, i will not buy any console that has always on drm or restricts preowned sales.
if these rumours, and the sony one, are true, the vita or wii u could be the last console i ever buy, i've already got a wii, ps3 and 360, and i want to get both vita and wii u at some point.
The problem is that MS is then not doing this alone,they must have huge third party support--tons of exclusives,features,etc
Publishers totally hate used sales,totally.They could easily just say,
"Sony,you want used sales?"
OK.Our games cost $20-$30 more on your platform...bye