According to market analyst, Michael Pachter, who recounted a meeting he had with Tretton at E3.
"He said, 'for the record, I'm totally opposed to blocking used games. I think it's great for the consumer that they can buy those. We have a customer that buys our console late in the cycle, pays less, is looking for value priced games, and I think it would be anti-consumer for us to do that'," Pachter told GameTrailers.com
As this goes, the PS4 is a buy for me.
But then again news from 269 days ago.
"Sony CEO Jack Tretton 'totally opposed to blocking used games'"
http://n4g.com/news/997036/...
He should also say "We are not doomed".
To stop the doom articles.
Only MS has the balls to do this imo.. They charge for multiplayer.. Everywhere else on earth it's free. They are really like apple for the console market.
Even a joke at E3 or something about it would be funny to me
I'm sure most board members of all companies who are gamers, or even somewhat consumer friendly, feel much the same way as Tretton. But these guys are business men, and to that end they have a responsibility to their company and investors to turn as much profit as possible.
Either way I'm doubting either system will block used games. I don't think either MS/Nintendo/Sony want to receive the fallout among their consumers for that decision.
Whenever he's being interview he's talking on behalf of the company and not expressing his own personal belief.
@dboyc310
"One console manufacture can't go into it alone because they'll just shoot themselves in the foot."
Which is why Sony will let them. lol But I think after the backlash MS will change directions on this issue, because either you allow users to play used games on your system or you won't sell any games at all.
Just seeing Kaz over the years he seems to be a gamer. I'm sure his views aren't much different. But that doesn't mean what's good for them personally is good for business...however I think they realize what you say, that this decision would be momentous, and not something that should be pursued lightly.
Given the amount of hyperbole spewed by the publishers on this matter, it's hard to discern the facts over actual lost revenue. One thing I know for sure though is that it is anti-consumer, and basically takes away all ownership rights, to which I am completely opposed, as apparently are many others.
"Just as Planned..." *twiddles fingers together with a bottle of wine for each*
Microsoft, you gonna go against used games? Naw, Sony's all for the gamers...Cmon in, buy a PS4~ . . .
knee-jerk reactions to a filed patent (an identical patent was filed prior to the PS3 launch, btw), and unsubstantiated rumours =/= no used games on the next playstation.
Related image(s)
As always Kotaku is full of it
"desperate for hits"- Hideki Kamiya
glad you notice that. XD
thanks!
In just over two years ive been sent just shy of $7,000 worth of games (yes i have a spreadsheet) & its only cost me just over $800. Wow i hadnt done the math to realise im paying about $5.00 per game & of the 161 games ive gotten 74 of them i got on launch day, I got dead space 3 yesterday & it cost me around $5.00 insane to think of it that way!
Microsoft wouldn't let Sony and Nintendo have such an advantage, they are greedy, but not stupid.
I think it amusing how people react to rumors.
http://www.gamepolitics.com...
Pachter and his fantasies :P
It is a good reminder on where sony stands.
For example, Tretton is SCEA, which means American PS4 players can buy used games.
But what about SCEE and SCEJ etc?
If I can't trade in games, I'm just going to buy a lot less new ones.
This whole story is turning out to be nothing but a black PR bluff.
In case you don't know what that is here's a history lesson.
>Xbox 1 is scratching discs in Japan.
>Nintendo DS will be replaced by a portable GameCube.
>Nintendo 3DS will be replaced by a dual stick revision.
>Nintendo Wii will be replaced by Wii HD.
Etc...
There is a bigger story at work here, and it's something beyond the understanding of most people. But for those of you with eyes to see...