140°
Submitted by NYC_Gamer 601d ago | review

IGN-Sly Cooper: Thieves in Time Review

IGN:What’s perhaps most striking about playing a Sly Cooper game late in the PS3 generation is how it proves that the brand itself is still relevant, as is the mascot-based 3D platformer. While similar PlayStation series like Jak & Daxter and Ratchet & Clank have either disappeared entirely or gone in new and strange directions respectively, the fourth Sly Cooper game is true to itself. The decision to remain true to what made Sly great in the first place is daring in an age where the 3D platformer can come off as a dinosaur. (PS Vita, PS3, Sly Cooper: Thieves in Time) 8/10

Dwalls1171  +   601d ago
Good review
-Superman-  +   601d ago
Great game, but i found 1 thing funny:
" Ridiculous load times "
lol
3-4-5  +   601d ago
Load times on a Sony Product ? NEVER! lol

That is the main issue Sony can never seem to grasp or fix.

100% of people hate Load Times...
NeverEnding1989  +   601d ago
I feel like this is a pattern for PS3 exclusives late in the generation. 8/10. Not bad at all, but not great.
#2 (Edited 601d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(28) | Report | Reply
Sizzon  +   601d ago
Well Ni No Kuni did great in reviews :)
cpayne93  +   601d ago
Last of Us and GoW will almost certainly get really high scores. I bet Beyond will too.
#2.2 (Edited 601d ago ) | Agree(15) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
LOGICWINS  +   601d ago
"Last of Us and GoW will almost certainly get really high scores. I bet Beyond will too."

And all of a sudden, IGN will no longer be ignorant.
Root  +   601d ago
@LOGICWINS

It's not really their reviews that people call them for, it's the way they write them and what they are like in general.
cpayne93  +   601d ago
@Root no, its just about always the score. Everyone complains about the score, very few people actually complain about the writing style. They rate a ps3 exclusive too low, and fanboys scream that they are evil people getting paid off by MS. They give a game a high score though, and suddenly nobody is complaining. Not just singling out Sony fanboys btw, you see this across the board.
Blastoise  +   601d ago
8 on the IGN scale = Great.

Plus I'd be willing to bet The Last Of Us, God of war ascension & beyond will be higher. The equivalent of God of war 2, Final fantasy 12 & Shadow of the colossus for the PS2 I reckon
TimeSkipLuffy  +   601d ago
better to have some exclusive games at 8 or higher than only one great title once in a while or nothing at all? XD
Good_Guy_Jamal  +   601d ago
Let's not make this a "thing" now.
#2.4.1 (Edited 601d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(3) | Report
Qrphe  +   601d ago
>trusting IGN in the first place

I remember when 7/10 was a good score and 5/10 was an average.
LOGICWINS  +   601d ago
"I remember when 7/10 was a good score and 5/10 was an average."

That never changed.
Zechs34  +   601d ago
What has this industry become when an 8/10 is not a good score?

Pattern for PS3 exclusives late in the generation? Imo, within the next 6 months, you will witness 3/5 of probably the best rated games this gen in The Last of Us, God of War Ascension, and Beyond Two Souls. Those are exclusives.

The other 2 I believe will be Bioshock Infinite and of course, GTA V. And one of those will be better on PS3 (Bioshock)

To finalize, a 8/10 for a sequel REAL fans have wanted for a few years in Sly 4, developed by a relatively low key studio (Sanzaru), cross buy compatible, AND retailing @ $40 new is,or should be, A No brainer purchase.
shivvy24  +   601d ago
ive played games that got lower than 8 and are fun , sly 3 got 8.1 and it was damn fun
Mainsqueeze  +   601d ago
I highly doubt that GOWA TLOU and BTS will have the same scores as GTA 4/5 or Bioshock 1/Infininite. Alot of sites will give them equally high scores but def not across the bored. But hey the only thing that matters is how much fun you have with them and not what the scores are.
JoGam  +   601d ago
So if a score 8 is not bad, what do you consider a Great score?
shivvy24  +   601d ago
ive played games that are fun but got lower than 8, just look at this for example : if you got 8/10 in a test thats a great score :D
HarryMasonHerpderp  +   601d ago
Well an 8/10 is considered "great" by IGN.
So what do you think of that?
#2.8 (Edited 601d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
darkride66  +   601d ago
Umm...isn't 8/10 considered "great"?
NeverEnding1989 said "8/10. Not bad at all, but not great."

Don't most sites consider an 8/10 "great"? Usually, it goes 7 is classified as "good", 8 "great", 9 "superb" and 10 is really quite remarkable.

Games that receive scores 8 and higher are usually few and far between.
princejb134  +   601d ago
8/10 is good for sites thats true
but in my personal opinion games that are 8/10 replay value are pretty small
and im the type of person that replay all my games at least twice, but if the game isnt that interesting, ill play ones and leave it collecting dust
FanMan  +   599d ago
funny that you say they are not great. considering the score of 8 on IGN is "Great". Its a great game just not amazing in IGNs opinion. It could be worse though. there could be no late exclusives like from microsoft or nintendo. Id rather have great games than few or no games.
ayabrea93  +   601d ago
looking forward to some good old fashioned platforming.
DivineAssault  +   601d ago
for $40 with crossbuy, who can complain?
shivvy24  +   601d ago
haters
bryam1982  +   601d ago
You got that right amigo

Only on playstation
Kingthrash360  +   601d ago
What annoys me most is the reviewers comments over at ign. I mean he says how the vita version is lacking in every way compared to the ps3 version. As a reviewer shouldnt he review it separately then. Like when pc comes out with the same game as consoles but they give separate reviews. Pc versions usually look better play better but I never hear them comparing consoles to pc. Why do this to the vita... not even the 3ds mario gets compared to the wii or wiiu's Version of mario. Its dumb to me ... not to say this score is wrong tho I pay no attention to scores its just the conments and comparisons that rub me the wrong way.
DOMination-  +   600d ago
The 3DS version of Mario isn't the same title as the Wii or WiiU games.

I guess he is just mentioning it because i for one assumed they would be identical. Isn't that supposed to be the point? Its hardly a taxing game on hardware so its disappointing to hear the Vita version is worse.
Kingthrash360  +   600d ago
Hardware specs mean nothing when you have memory restrictions. The ps3 version is huge 16.7 gigs... while the vita version is a mere 3.9 gigs... just do the math. They will never be identical, and they know this..its phenominal how close it is with this memory gap and should be praised for it....smh

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
20°

Kmart Ad 10/5 - 10/11

15m ago - Take a look at the latest Kmart weekly ad. | Wii
30°

DLC: Real World Destiny Loot Cave Found (Satire)

16m ago - The Deliberate Lies Column, or DLC for short, is a Tabloid style news column where we don't break... | Xbox 360
40°

Crimes & Punishments: Sherlock Holmes Review | TwoDashStash

1h ago - The Sherlock Holmes games have come a long way since they first appeared on PC in 2002 with The M... | PC
30°

Cosmochoria Early Access Preview – Cute But Deadly | SegmentNext

1h ago - SegmentNext writes: "As an Early Access title, Cosmochoria already feels decked out for the major... | PC
Ad

Forza Horizon 2 (XB1) Review

Now - Ken takes to the open-road with this Xbox One racer. | Promoted post
40°

Sherlock Holmes: Crimes and Punishments Review | High Score Reviews

1h ago - Honestly, Jordan's expectations were not high of this game but it began to grow on him as he prog... | PC
Related content from friends