MP1st - "The Crysis 3 multiplayer beta is live and is here to stay until the 12th of February, one week before Crysis 3 officially launches on the PC, Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 on February 19. What do we think of it so far?"
I love the controls on crysis three. Also the the multiplayer is enjoyable. I haven't been playing black ops 2 because of crysis 3 beta. It will be a day 1 buy for me.
I remember when crysis 2 launched and they said it used all of the ps3's and xbox's power and that it was the best looking console game. I wont compare it to uncharted but it disnt even compare to Killzone 3. I think the lighting masks alot of issues on consoles. Anyway, crysis 3 seems to be what crysis 2 should have been. Tighter, cleaner, built for pc, and it is very similar. It actually feels like a mao pack or something. I just wish they coulda held out for 6 months and launched on next gen. I love pc but most if my friends play on ps3. I have seen the difference and it absurd. Its like the console is really cloudy.
But then they can re-release it on PS4 and 720 and say "Remastered in full 1080P HD."
This game has the same bland gameplay they've had since day one but with all the eye candy that graphics whores demand.
As much as I HATE to admit it (considering what crybaby A-holes Crytek has been) the game is actually pretty fun. I've gotten quite addicted to the Hunter mode. This is one of those examples where I really enjoy the game, but I can't stand the developers/publishers. I had the exact same situation with Capcom's Dragon's Dogma. Anyways, as for the graphics, I don't see what all the fuss is about... They really aren't even that great. Crytek needs to shut up about them.
considering what crybaby A-holes Crytek has been Have they ? Crysis 2 they gave more attention support to console gamers did as much as they could with there engine. While we PC Gamers had to wait for the HD texture pack to be realesed with dx11 BUT what some fail to realise is thats not the devs fault they do what they get told Fact. That said because the PC Gmers voice there anger alot turns out crysis 3 will be more PC This time. Ive had crysis 2 on consoles loved the graphics but maybe cos i love there engine since cry engine 2 crytek also gave console players a chance to play first crysis witch was awsome had to be sorted optimised for consoles but still they done it they gave back. However recently past year crytek CEO Cevat Yerli. Has been running his mouth doing more harm than good with silly statements but lets not forget he is only a CEO not a dev these guys that should be had ago at not devs.
They are crybaby a-holes because they pass the blame of their own insufficient programming skills onto the console's limitations, and even then, they for one, stated that Crysis 2 was using every tiny drop of power the Xbox and PS3 had left, then nope, now Crysis 3 is; a game probably much more optimized (so it should ACTUALLY be using less power than C2, even though they said the opposite.) What you fail to realize, is that Crytek will blame anyone else for their own shortcomings. (That's the crybaby part). Then, as if that wasn't bad enough, they constantly bragging about how powerful their games are, and again, this isn't even true if you look at some of the much better looking games out there, that are also much more massive. (That is the a-hole part)
Graphics arent that great but the gameplay is improved from Crysis 2, im enjoying it so far :)
Ya I'm sure it's amazing on a high end PC, but console version graphically isn't anything special.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.