Top
640°

Crysis 3 Xbox 360 vs. PC HD Screenshot Comparison

Check out a HD screenshot comparison between the Xbox 360 and PC versions of Crysis 3.

Read Full Story >>
translate.google.com
The story is too old to be commented.
chukamachine1277d ago

Wow that is a blur fest on the 360.

decrypt1277d ago (Edited 1277d ago )

Comparison is pointless.

Console gamers.. Dont care about graphics. Its why they game on 6 year old hardware.

@below

Bickering over pixie differences doesnt = caring about graphics.

kevnb1277d ago

sure they do, look at what happens when 360 and ps3 games are compared. Or even when a new console comes out. Or better yet, when a new uncharted game comes out.

shutUpAndTakeMyMoney1277d ago (Edited 1277d ago )

"Console gamers.. Dont care about graphics."

You have said that 11 times I think.

Console gamers care about graphics.

I think the 360 version of the character is drunk. Everything is so blurry!
Alan wake is the same.
http://www.youtube.com/watc...

540p 30fps on 360 lol.
http://n4g.com/news/510664/...

Bimkoblerutso1277d ago (Edited 1277d ago )

I think console gamers are just aware that "graphics" consist of more than simply the sum of a game's tech.

ZeroX98761277d ago (Edited 1277d ago )

console gamers prefer buying a system and having support for it for more than 5 years without having to buy new hardware at a not too high price.

PC Gamers prefers buying a system with high specs to run their games to the max and are ready to pay a bit more for a whole different experience of gaming.

Console gamers just prefer getting the more bang for their bucks (console-related), hence why the comparison between 360 and PS3. Or they're simply just fanboys

inveni01277d ago

This comparison is bull crap. The PC has been sharpened, the 360 blurred. It's quite obvious.

showtimefolks1277d ago

decrypt

we care about graphics but we are not dicks about it like some of you pc gamers. PC is better than console there i said it, i am a console gamer only.

its like every article pc gamers have to come and tell us how awesome pc games are, yeh we get it but do you get the MS,Sony,Nintendo exclusives? do you get a lot of games from RS day one at launch?

do you have DRM?
Do you have Piracy issues?

Isn't PC's piracy the real reason we have online passes?

we care about graphics but with our games to e God of war looks stunning, to me the snow in Uncharted 2 looks stunning, to me halo 4 looks stunning

go ahead tell me how great those games would look on PC, But guess what we have em on console while y'all don't so you win some and you loose some

can't wait to Buy ps4,xbox720 while you buy a new PC or keep upgrading it every 2 years, yet my 7 years old console keeps delivering stunning games

its not about the tools but how you use it lol

BitbyDeath1277d ago

Gameplay should always come first over graphics.
If you're only into graphics then you really shouldn't be playing games.

juandren1277d ago

If you care about graphics and not about gameplay why do you even game? Just step outside. The world has amazing graphics. I can send you some photos of the environment and REAL LIFE PEOPLE if you want?

NewZealander1277d ago

i couldn't care less about the graphic difference, lets face it theres no point, we all know the current gen has got old.

for me as a console gamer anything released now is just filler until the next gen consoles arrive, thats when ill care about graphics again.

Nafon1277d ago

There is a reason you only have one bubble. go sit in the corner.

AO1JMM1277d ago

All of you fed this troll.

knowyourstuff1277d ago (Edited 1277d ago )

It isn't that console gamers don't care about graphics, it's that they want to get the best graphics that they possibly can given their financial means. If you can't afford a 1000 dollar PC to get Crysis 3 running on max settings, labelling that person as someone who doesn't care about graphics isn't exactly fair, nor smart. It's like labelling starving people in Africa as "people who don't care about food".

mynameisEvil1277d ago

@showtimefolks

Long story short: I don't hate consoles. But they do represent some very old hardware and they constantly show the limitations of such old hardware. Don't get me wrong, some of the games on the systems are fantastic, but it's stupid to pretend as though they're just as good as PCs. The thing with PCs is that they are constantly evolving. The thing with consoles is that it's just not their nature to evolve. It's for THAT reason that PCs are better gaming systems.

Before people mark this as trolling and hating on consoles, keep in mind that it was a comment explaining what is mostly wrong with console gamers and some of their inane arguments rather than the consoles themselves.

PS. My comment was too large to post. But none of your arguments are either factually incorrect (concerning DRM and PC piracy causing online passes, since Uncharted 3 and Resistance 3 had them) or your statements cross over to consoles, too (console piracy is incredibly rampant, the least so in PS3).

d3nworth11277d ago

True console gamers dont care about graphics. I game on both PC and Ps3 but mostly the Ps3. Not because i dont care for graphics but because it more convenient. Plus I know every game that comes out for it will run. No need to worry about system specs. At the end of the day its the same game. I dont see the point of nagging over pixels.

+ Show (11) more repliesLast reply 1277d ago
Ezz20131277d ago (Edited 1277d ago )

the xbox version look like a ps2 game when you put it aganist the pc version ...
even if you compare it to top 3rd party titles on consoles
it doesn't look good at all
as you said this is a "blur fest"
....what the hell crytek ?
crysis 3 look worse than crysis 2 on consoles ?!0_o?!

pc version for me

angelsx1277d ago

Where is the promised DX11 graphics on consoles?

mr_kubrick1277d ago

I bet 1000 bucks u havent played it.
The MP on 360 looks way better then Crysis 2. I was quite surprised how crisp and sharp it was. AA looks good, Lighting is easily the best on Consoles.

But a Sony Guy with TLOU as an avatar....well, that explains everything....usual trolling....

GearSkiN1277d ago

looks like a ps2 games? sounds to me that u havent played game much, as you can see xbox360 from ps2 xbox1 era is a huge job. even for an old console. comparing it to pc the graphics is not as low as you make it out to be... and yes my whole house is a gamefest PC, anc console. so i know.

ExCest1277d ago

@angelsx

Those will not come until next-gen. Consoles barely run games on a DX9 equivalent.

Ezz20131277d ago (Edited 1277d ago )

@mr_kubrick

wait what ?!! i said i'm going to buy pc version
did i say "teh ps3 version is teh best " ??!
i know both ps3/360 version will look and play the same
but i'm going with pc

.. how is that makes me a ps3 fanboy or a troll??!!
because i have different opinion than you ??

and this a multiplat game not xbox exclusives
and if you even look at my account you will see i own xbox

as it seems logic and commensense left N4G long ago

smh

mr_kubrick1277d ago

@ ezz

So u "know" they play the same and the final product looks like a ps2 compared to pc....again I ask you: DID YOU PLAY BOTH THE PC AND THE XBOX-DEMO????? I doubt it....but looking at you post history shows u cleary are a sony slave and you will NEVER every say anything good about the Xbox...

slaton241277d ago

of course thats not what the image looks like the 360 is a little better than that...sure it has 2005 tech but its not that bad at all this is just somethinga pc user more than likely did.....go ahead pc gamers disagree i do not care

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 1277d ago
IAmLee1277d ago

probs require a few extra texture packs..

ATi_Elite1277d ago

WoW the Xbox360 version looks like utter GARBAGE! The player is either drunk or has cataracts cause it's so blurry and just imagine how crappy the PS3 version may look as multiplats usually are better on Xbox360.

.....and just think the PC version is not even running on MAX graphics so it will only get better and then a High texture mod will come out and COMPLETELY destroy Ultra settings.

Consolers don't care about graphics.........Cool Story Bro cause if that was true then Xbox and PS2 would still be the consoles of Today!

This comparison is just further proof that New consoles are LONG over due for updated GRAPHICS, Better A.I., and MMO capabilities!

so Yes it's more than Graphics cause console A.I. sucks and consoles need to be able to handle MMO's next Gen.

Also you consolers NEED games driven by Gamers like Eve Online, DayZ, Wasteland, etc. and current consoles can't handle this.

Orpheus1277d ago

I think the single player will look even better :-)

ThatGuy21277d ago

Hell yeah,crysis has made a come back for pc players.Thank god its not a port like last one

charted1277d ago (Edited 1277d ago )

Are people that thick in their head, that a 7 year old console is being compared to a updated pc?

If compared to a 7 year old pc hardware, then it would've broken down.

A more sensible comparison is console vs console.

Why does BF3 look great on a PC then on a console? Because people update their pc whereas console don't.

Some comparison are just retarded.

AngelicIceDiamond1277d ago (Edited 1277d ago )

Yeah it is a blur fest but what u expect its PC VS console. PC wins

It'll be interesting comparing next gen games to current PC though.

There's no real graphical difference just blurry on the 360 like looking through a semi foggy lense or something.

Tsar4ever011277d ago

why no show on PS3 comparison? I tell you why. It looks even worst than what were seeing on the 360.

smithmaria5951277d ago SpamShow
indubitably1277d ago

I would be willing to bet it had at least a little to do with the capture technology used. Still entirely possible the blur is just to make up for a really low resolution possibly.

Baylex1277d ago (Edited 1277d ago )

LOL that was funny ahah xD

But anyways, about the pc and the console... I bought my laptop over 2 years ago and still plays most of the games in high settings.. like Borderlands 2, DmC, Batman Arkham City, even Far Cry 3 I can play it with normal and some high settings with no problem.
And when I bought my laptop it wasn't a big laptop it was an avarage laptop.. and after 2 years is still running strong!! You don't need to have a FU*KING power rig to run most of the games... just a medium pc will max out like 80% of the games ;) that's why I din't by another xbox 360

mcstorm1276d ago

@chukamachine I agree and looking at the pics I don't believe the graphics will look like this on the 360. If you look at the pictures in detail the full 360 picture is blurred out where you would expect the distance to be but not the gun and health items.

I don't expect the 360 version to look as good as the pc but I don't think the 360 version of the game will look like this web site has made it out to be.

1nsomniac1276d ago

What do you expect on a console that's coming up to be a decade old it's done amazingly well. Definitely on its last legs though.

The disapointing point out of this comparison is how little the PC has moved on :(

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 1276d ago
Walker1277d ago BadLanguageShowReplies(2)
RuleofOne343 1277d ago

Still getting it on 360 , not becoming a jerk again or a self-centred tool on PC again such a sad thing to be .

raytraceme1277d ago (Edited 1277d ago )

Getting it on pc. No annoying kids, dedicated servers, and next-gen graphics. What's self centered about playing on a pc??? Cost me $200 to get a great gpu to add to my pc. You don't need a lot of money to game on a pc ;)

RuleofOne343 1277d ago (Edited 1277d ago )

Just tired of putting out cash so I can yap up my Rig & about how my system can do this & that. It's an endless cycle of my dad can beat up your dad mentality that got old for me.
so I just give it up & went to consoles where I just buy & go about my gaming time no concern or added expense.

@RuperttheBear when I gamed on PC .

SlyFoxC1277d ago

$200.....thats really not that good of a GPU... just saying..

Sarcasm1277d ago (Edited 1277d ago )

^$200 is a great gpu. Not everybody can afford $500 or $800+ monsters.

Although I admit I have a GTX 680 but got it for $400 last year. I don't ever see myself paying above that for any GPU ever. The last one I did was a GTX 580 for around $550 when it was first launched only for a couple years later for it to be worth $250.

So yeah, $200 for something like a GTX 660 or Radeon 7850 is Grrrrrrrrrrrrreat!

kevnb1277d ago

because gaming on pc turns you into an asshole...

pr0digyZA1277d ago

Well apparently it does, it warps your mind and makes you become something else entirely, it's like you have no control over your own personality/s

Hes obviously just trolling, trying to make himself feel better.

RuperttheBear1277d ago

'not becoming a jerk again'

When did you stop being one?

sourav931277d ago

You've never owned a gaming PC. If you did, you wouldn't have said those words.

FlameBaitGod1277d ago

He just mad he doesn't have one.

Eldyraen1277d ago

@SlyFoxC: $200 can get you a respectable graphics card these days that stomps today's consoles and more than likely are on par or possibly better than next gen--especially if you pick them up when on sale. You don't "need" to spend the $500+ that some of us do.

It just depends on how much you're willing to spend and at what settings you want to play at. When it comes to PC its all about choices. I've known people that bought "weaker" cards that still max out most games just to play at lower resolution (especially useful if hooked to tv as not as close as a monitor anyways so difference isn't as pronounced).

Still, probably not near as strong as a high end card (unless used and good deal), but its all objective when it comes to PCs and their users anyways. It could still have been a great upgrade on what they had been using ;)

Qrphe1277d ago

So you'll get it on the 360 to avoid becoming a PC master race jerk?

If not you should've worked your sentence better pal.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 1277d ago
Ve3tro1277d ago (Edited 1277d ago )

Obviously the console versions don't look at good as the PC but those X360 shots are wrong.

Look at these pics attached which was taken from the 360 beta today.

http://shinnn.minus.com/mbt...

http://i.minus.com/iBbnBKmt...

raytraceme1277d ago

xbox shots are correct. The webite is showing a True PC-Xbox comparson. They are showing the difference that you would see on a 1080p hdtv. The blurriness, lack of detail, etc... is how different the xbox version would look compared to the pc version on the same screen.

aawells071277d ago

Completely agree and i knew that without looking at the screenshots you provided. I play on PC only and i know that the console versions will not look that bad.

ThatGuy21277d ago (Edited 1277d ago )

at 1080p they will....those screens where in 1080p

landog1277d ago (Edited 1277d ago )

@ve3tro

ok now streach those images you posted to fill your 32" to 50" screen that you play your console games on and that is EXACTLY how bad it will look on console

your looking at the screen minimized i bet which is compressing the shit out of it and it will never look that crisp on an actual tv while playing

and even while compressed in the images you posted, you can see how very low res the trees, the brush, the cement, all looking like last gen, ancient, 8 year old textures becasue that is exactly what they are, everything on console looks 8 years old to me.

now imagine that screen you posted with 10x higher textures, lighting, shadows, anti aliasing and resolution and thats what it will look like on pc

Ve3tro1276d ago (Edited 1276d ago )

I know how low res the console versions are since I've taken my own pics in the X360's 1080p setting with my own hardware and yes they are blurry but this site has made them look even worse.

They look more blured and the contrast looks weak as shit. It's like they've purposely chosen the worse settings for X360 in regards to Reference Levels, HDMI Colorspace and thats if they even used HDMI.

Going by the pictures it looks more like Component was used and well Component isn't the best quality picture in todays world when you can use HDMI.

Qrphe1277d ago (Edited 1277d ago )

1080p is so 2007. Why not play at the glorious 2560x1600 resolution?????

http://i.imgur.com/cFCm7GN....

Edit: lol at all those saying that graphics are "reaching bottlenecks" and graphics won't improve in general.

steve30x1276d ago

Because a monitor that does that resolution is very expensive. I want a monitor that is 2560 x 1440 but the cheapest one is over 600 euro.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1276d ago
stone_cold1277d ago TrollingShowReplies(1)