Worldwide Hardware:
1: 3DS - 176,740 (-20%)
2: PS3 - 112,583 (-19%)
3: X360 - 84,816 (-17%)
4: WiiU - 39,390 (-25%)
5: Wii - 32,605 (-29%)
6: PSP - 32,191 (-12%)
7: DS - 28,336 (-26%)
8: PSV - 28,269 (-25%)
Worldwide Software:
1: (PS3) DMC - 362,982
2: (X360) DMC - 183,109
3: (3DS) Animal Crossing: New Leaf - 98,186
4: (PS3) Call of Duty: Black Ops II - 89,560
5: (X360 Call of Duty: Black Ops II - 81,762
6: (Wii) Just Dance 4 - 55,039
7: (PS3) FIFA Soccer 13 - 49,130
8: (X360) Halo 4 - 47,335
9: (PSP) Digimon Adventure - 47,036
10: (3DS) New Super Mario Bros. 2 - 46,262
On another note, DmC failed to match DMC4's so far.
PS3 versions of games outselling 360 versions isn't really something new.
Sales of Skyrim and Black Ops 1 and 2 are waving hello. You know games sales numbers that actually matter.
Anyways, moot point. bring on next gen!
mhm...
Being extremely hyperbolic there, dontcha think?
versions of games quite a bit these days.
For example,
ASSASSIN'S CREED 3 and RESIDENT EVIL 6 sold more on the PS3
http://www.vgchartz.com/gam...
Exactly the kind of thing MS is ridiculed for doing with multi-platformm games.
you're on a roll for being wrong. Sony has stated that they don't pay for any exclusives and companies only do so by their choice and nothing else.
http://spong.com/article/13...
Microsoft paid for to get GTA4 the same time as ps3. 75 million to be exact.
http://www.gamespot.com/new...
this isnt 2007 anymore. sony pays for things just like MS does. That is just the nature of business in this generation.
to still think otherwise is behind the times.
But that's about it. Everything else sells better on Xbox. Hopefully you know this? That's how its been for..well since this gen started.
"PS3 versions of games outsell Xbox 360." Sorry but that's a huge total lie. If that's the case we would be seeing PlayStation logos beside most 3rd party games.
Devs want to show off their flag shipped games on the most popular console.
"Devs want to show off their flag shipped games on the most popular console."
Then in that case, it would go PS3 > 360 world wide right? lol. Considering the PS3 has been outselling the 360 WW for many years. Anyways, it's common knowledge that MANY (if not most) genres, other than shooters, sell more on PS3, except for maybe WRPG's.
Racing games, fighting games, platformers, hack n slash games, JRP's, and action adventure games most of the time sell better on PS3. Of course shooters are the most popular genre right now so you thinking "Everything else sells better on Xbox" is understandable.
Of course you're wrong though.
I for one just can't get into anything else, but I was so happy I tried out Elder Scrolls Oblivion because that really changed my perspective.
Side note: If you like games similar to Command and Conquer, in WWII style, but with a twist you should REALLY REALLY REALLY try the game RUSE. Most underrated game ever it is so much fun (PS3 and 360). I just play Battles all the time!
pretty amazing considering it's been 11 weeks
Especially as killer games come in time for this years holiday season.
I know Sony fans want to pretend the Wiiu is somehow in the same boat as the vita , but it simply is not and will be successfull by end of 2013.
Don't believe me ? Wait and see.
There are two things that could get the WiiU over 10 million by the end of 2013:
1) A price drop
2) Casual games
But price is the key. The WiiU won't match the Wii's success at $300/$350. If there isn't a price drop, people will have to spend $350/$400 to buy a WiiU with Wii Fit U this summer, and that's if they already have the balance board.
I don't see casual gamers buying the WiiU for $350, just like casual gamers didn't buy the 3DS for $250 and currently the PSV for $250.
If Japan weren't Nintendo nutjobs the Wii would be outselling WiiU today. That is bad. But don't tell that to a Nintendo fanboy.
http://chan.catiewayne.com/...
EDIT - unfortunately, you're right. But, like Sony, they won't stay in last place forever.
I give them kudos for the turn around they have done. Certainly Sony seems to have righted the ship nicely but dear lord... 6yrs to get to where they are just seems crazy when you think back to how fantastic the PS2 sold and dominated.
I'm incredibly worried about the state of Wii U though. It's WAY below targets.
They didn't "piss away" anything. The Wii tapped into a market that wasn't nearly as much of a factor last generation, so one could argue that much of its sales don't even factor into the "market share" argument.
Is there some part of people's brains that can't grasp that each generation things all BUT go back to zero? Otherwise, we'd be saying this about Nintendo after they ran a couple of consecutive generations, too.
Edit: The MAIN point, LackingSenseGamer, is that performance in one gen is NO indicator of how you'll do next gen. Comparing market share from one generation to the next is pointless because of this.
I mean, do we expect things to be exactly the same this gen, with the Wii U doing 90 million despite having a different audience and new competition on the market?
Market share is an acceptable measure WITH CONTEXT. Not just tossed up arbitrarily. Just like sales or anything else.
I dare say these market shares will change as the PS3 continues to perform well towards the end of its life cycle but compared to previous gen they have lost ground at the expense of their competitors. However, overall more units in total have been shipped this gen than last gen which has to be good for the gaming industry.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/w...
you seem to lack it to a certain degree. Microsoft started this gen with a 100% market. This isn't going off of the generation before it. We're speaking solely about this gen. They went from a dominating first to a distance third this generation alone. Microsoft had PC-like architecture, advertisement, exclusive DLC, and let's fact it (America). Wii passed had it's price point and innovation to propel it passed 360. Sony's first party and 2nd party have shot Sony into the number 2 spot. Sony had bad media, poor advertising, complex architecture, once sony exclusive IPs going multiplatform, and let's not forget the price. Sony's ego took a hit and they started trying to win the GAMERS back. We don't want to dance with virtual avatars. We don't want a camera for voice commands when we could have easily used our headsets at a fraction of the cost. We don't want to have to pay for Netflix/Hulu Plus and then pay to use them on our console. We don't want to have to pay for a service that is free on PC. Ps2 expanded the market during it's generation much like how the Wii did this generation. Seems like to me, you have to find a way to expand the market to be number one.
What he said is right on. Sony has taken a beating these past years and it shows with how poorly the vita is doing. There has been no vita titles in the top 10. Sony only has about 9 to 10 months before next gen hits and I don't see them making up any global market share. They should just focus resources on the PS4 and try to get Vita sales up some more.
realize one fact. There will never be another "ps2" again. Stop trying to compare the success of the ps3 according to ps2 standards. It's like trying to compare every FPS success based on COD standards. If ps3 sells 100 million then, it will looked at as a success to Sony.
with the anti Sony news. Now i wont deny that Sony had some short comings this generation. There are so many other factors that come into play when you're talking about the ps2. It was a much different market at the time. Dreamcast died because of piracy and Microsoft didn't launch xbox until some time after ps2. PS2 expanded the market as a whole. Kinda of like how the Wii did this gen. Sony also had a format to push and bring programmers up to multicore cpu (8 instead of 4)with the ps3.
Having an entire year to yourself, launching as the first next gen console. Having a lead as much as 10 million and the market share of 100%. Sony never had 100 % market share in any generation and neither has Nintendo. To lose that and end up in last place speaks more to me. Now which company has been more of a failure?
on the previous generation to justify Microsoft from going first to last this generation. He was saying that when a generation starts, the previous one is irrelevant because those sales are locked in stone. Going by that logic, Nintendo would have lost the most market share. Nothing justifies blowing a lead as big as 10 million with a year headstart. I'm pretty sure investor aren't being as optimistic about it as you are.
Speaking of head starts, Sony had a seven year head start over MS in the console industry. Today they are WAY behind a competitor they demolished in the past, and barely neck and neck with another. Now which company has been more of a failure?
@Hicken - "Is there some part of people's brains that can't grasp that each generation things all BUT go back to zero?" You act as if people forget what consoles existed in a previous generation when a new generation begins. People's perceptions, and brand loyalty & goodwill don't reset and go back to zero. MS & Nintendo deserve credit for increasing it's market share at Sony's expense, just as Sony deserved credit for taking Nintendo's market share in the 1990's. Look at it this way - next football season every team will start at zero, but that doesn't mean that certain teams will be heavily favored based on their performance in the prior season. If the Chiefs make the playoffs next season and the Ravens don't, it would be a huge upset because of what happened this year.
Again, you just don't WANT to believe that performance from one generation to another is important because doing so makes Sony look bad.
If I'm not mistaken I did say Sony had some short comings this generation. You're play semantics with this now. You're using "head start" in a different context then other people. We already made this point about Nintendo if you were to use that type of logic. Sony's previous generations, each playstation has sold over 100 million. All signs show the ps3 is going to continue that trend. The last generation didn't make Sony look bad, it actually does the opposite. Sony's ego hurt them in the beginning but by becoming humble, it paid off for them in the long run. Microsoft lost track of what got them to where they were and ended up in last place.
Yeah it is shocking. Shocking that so many people went with the casual Wii, though many of them weren't the average gamer type, but even more shocking that so many people jumped on the 360 bandwagon after the way MS dumped the XBox. People continued to buy 360s after they were shown to be one of the worst built consumer electronics products in history. Shocking indeed.
CommonSenseGamer has about as much common sense as LogicWins has logic. Sony spanked everyone soundly last gen, so now it's a huge victory for the other players to gain market share? Come on now. MS had nowhere to go but up, and Nintendo knew they couldn't compete with either MS or Sony on their terms so they went after an almost completely different market. Even though the Wii is cheap to produce, it was a big risk that paid off for them. Sony launched a high priced console during a worldwide recession, after giving their main competitor a year head start. The fact that they've done as well as they have is remarkable. End of story.
They certainly beat Sony in the US, but failed miserably in Japan. Did well in Europe, considering, but didn't come out on top.
Still, this gen isn't over yet.
Am I doin' it wrong?
Sony's killer exclusive lineup will drive sales through the roof after this year IMO
People are already flocking to ps3 for ni no kuni!!!
Just so people know, sony still has the more expensive machine (if you just look @ price tag)
A price drop will be a megaton seller and i fully expect ps3 to surpass wii in years to come