90°
Submitted by aprea 799d ago | interview

Insomniac Don’t Want to Become Sony First-Party: Interview With Brian Allgeier

Insomniac Games has certainly been through some drama with Fuse. Originally being unveiled as Overstrike, only to change its name and core mechanics soon after, it’s been a pretty eventful ride for all to watch. But now with the release of Fuse finally drawing near, there was no better time to sit with the game’s Creative Director, Brian Allgeier and chat about all things Insomniac, game design and just what he thinks about becoming first-party. (Fuse, PS3, Xbox 360)

majiebeast  +   799d ago
Look where it got you making a shitty facebook game and a generic shooter.
NYC_Gamer  +   799d ago
Some studios value being independent
Godchild1020  +   799d ago
That is the type of Independence they wanted. They wanted to make cross platform title(s) and now they can. While we won't ever see a new Resistance from them, it does open the opportunity for a developer that is a fan of the series to take it upon themselves to expand the series. Similar to how Sanzaru is making Sly.

I thought the developers owned their IPs when it comes to Sony, I guess that is not the case for Insomniac?
#1.2 (Edited 799d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
PirateThom  +   799d ago
No, one of Sony's publishing rules (outside of Pub Fund games) is that Sony, not the developer, own the IP. It's why they have such a large variety of franchises.

Games like Heavenly Sword or Wild Arms were made by third parties but wholly owned by Sony.
#1.2.1 (Edited 799d ago ) | Agree(7) | Disagree(0) | Report
Godchild1020  +   799d ago
I didn't know that. I guess that's a reason why a lot of fans are mad that there weren't a lot of characters in PSASBR.
Soldierone  +   799d ago
Depends what you mean by that comment with PS All Stars.

The reason being, Sony was buying rights to a lot of them. People were mad at third party characters and licenses Sony sold, so they would have needed to get licensing rights back for the game.

For example Sony owned Crash and Spyro, but sold them to Universal, which sold them to Activision. Sony no longer has rights to make games with those characters in it, unless they pay Activision.

Basically if Sony published it (It says Sony Computer Entertainment Presents on the first screen) then Sony owns rights to it now. Third parties giving Sony an exclusive game, but publishing it themselves (Such as NIS titles) are not owned by them at all. It kind of protects that games like Uncharted or Resistance don't end up elsewhere, but they are generous enough to not want to milk things like a third party and allow ONLY that studio to work on it, with creative freedom as well. AKA you wouldn't see Overstrike become FUSE at SCEA.
yewles1  +   799d ago
@Soldierone

"For example Sony owned Crash and Spyro, but sold them to Universal, which sold them to Activision. Sony no longer has rights to make games with those characters in it, unless they pay Activision."

WHY does EVERYBODY get this wrong? Sony NEVER owned Crash or Spyro, they had to purchase the PS1 games from Universal to keep AFTER those devs left the franchises...

http://www.gamesindustry.bi...
http://www.gamesindustry.bi...
#1.2.4 (Edited 799d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report
sinncross  +   799d ago
@Soldierone

you need to get your facts right. Sony NEVER owned Crash or Spyro. They belonged to Universal Interactive Studios, who at the time were not capable of publishing titles, so they gave that right to Sony.

Think of it like Bayonetta 2... the IP still belongs to SEGA but SEGA have given Nintendo the rights to publish (that is fund) the game.
animegamingnerd  +   799d ago
well to be fair i think EA had a hand in turning overstrike into that generic shooter fused
j-blaze   799d ago | Trolling | show
Belking  +   799d ago
Nothing wrong with that. After 15 years they deserve to make a cross platform game. I think it's great that studios can pick their own publisher and own their IPs. I hope this stuff happens more in the future.
Hicken  +   799d ago
How do they "deserve" to make a cross-platform game?
Belking  +   799d ago
Because Belking said so.
Soldierone  +   799d ago
My question is what about when things go more digital? The cost to "publish" a game won't be as high. You will pay maybe bandwith fee's and a licensing fee, but thats it. Would a company stable enough to handle it like Insomniac skip the publisher all together and do it themselves?
DBergmark  +   799d ago
Doesn't*
shivvy24  +   799d ago
ily insomniac
black911  +   799d ago
They'll be crying back.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
10°

Payday 2 - BBQ Pack and Overkill Pack Behind the Scenes Trailer

9m ago - BBQ Pack and Overkill Pack Behind the Scenes Trailer of Payday 2. | PC
20°

What I Learned During My Completion of Bloodborne

11m ago - CraveOnline: "Having completed Bloodborne on Monday, I was one of the first people in the world t... | PS4
Ad

Want to Join the Releases.com Team? We are Looking for News Editors

Now - We are looking for news editors for the following categories. Games, TV Series, Movies and Tech. If you are an aspiring journalist in one of these... | Promoted post
20°

The Best Podcast on the Citadel, Ep. 35

13m ago - This week on The Best Podcast on the Citadel, the guys discuss the games they picked up (and fini... | Culture
20°

Review: Sick Bricks (DarkZero)

14m ago - FamilyGamerTV: "Sick Bricks is a new iOS game from Spin Master that takes more than a leaf out of... | iPhone
20°

Sid the Snake gives you three minutes to eat a mouse - bet you can't do it

34m ago - Pocket Gamer: Stewart Hogarth (aka Smiling Bag) proved with the ZX Spectrum-like I Am Level that... | iPhone