Quantcast
90°
Submitted by aprea 126d ago | interview

Insomniac Don’t Want to Become Sony First-Party: Interview With Brian Allgeier

Insomniac Games has certainly been through some drama with Fuse. Originally being unveiled as Overstrike, only to change its name and core mechanics soon after, it’s been a pretty eventful ride for all to watch. But now with the release of Fuse finally drawing near, there was no better time to sit with the game’s Creative Director, Brian Allgeier and chat about all things Insomniac, game design and just what he thinks about becoming first-party. (Fuse, PS3, Xbox 360)

majiebeast  +   126d ago
Look where it got you making a shitty facebook game and a generic shooter.
NYC_Gamer  +   126d ago
Some studios value being independent
Godchild1020  +   126d ago
That is the type of Independence they wanted. They wanted to make cross platform title(s) and now they can. While we won't ever see a new Resistance from them, it does open the opportunity for a developer that is a fan of the series to take it upon themselves to expand the series. Similar to how Sanzaru is making Sly.

I thought the developers owned their IPs when it comes to Sony, I guess that is not the case for Insomniac?
#1.2 (Edited 126d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
PirateThom  +   126d ago
No, one of Sony's publishing rules (outside of Pub Fund games) is that Sony, not the developer, own the IP. It's why they have such a large variety of franchises.

Games like Heavenly Sword or Wild Arms were made by third parties but wholly owned by Sony.
#1.2.1 (Edited 126d ago ) | Agree(7) | Disagree(0) | Report
Godchild1020  +   126d ago
I didn't know that. I guess that's a reason why a lot of fans are mad that there weren't a lot of characters in PSASBR.
Soldierone  +   126d ago
Depends what you mean by that comment with PS All Stars.

The reason being, Sony was buying rights to a lot of them. People were mad at third party characters and licenses Sony sold, so they would have needed to get licensing rights back for the game.

For example Sony owned Crash and Spyro, but sold them to Universal, which sold them to Activision. Sony no longer has rights to make games with those characters in it, unless they pay Activision.

Basically if Sony published it (It says Sony Computer Entertainment Presents on the first screen) then Sony owns rights to it now. Third parties giving Sony an exclusive game, but publishing it themselves (Such as NIS titles) are not owned by them at all. It kind of protects that games like Uncharted or Resistance don't end up elsewhere, but they are generous enough to not want to milk things like a third party and allow ONLY that studio to work on it, with creative freedom as well. AKA you wouldn't see Overstrike become FUSE at SCEA.
yewles1  +   126d ago
@Soldierone

"For example Sony owned Crash and Spyro, but sold them to Universal, which sold them to Activision. Sony no longer has rights to make games with those characters in it, unless they pay Activision."

WHY does EVERYBODY get this wrong? Sony NEVER owned Crash or Spyro, they had to purchase the PS1 games from Universal to keep AFTER those devs left the franchises...

http://www.gamesindustry.bi...
http://www.gamesindustry.bi...
#1.2.4 (Edited 126d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report
sinncross  +   126d ago
@Soldierone

you need to get your facts right. Sony NEVER owned Crash or Spyro. They belonged to Universal Interactive Studios, who at the time were not capable of publishing titles, so they gave that right to Sony.

Think of it like Bayonetta 2... the IP still belongs to SEGA but SEGA have given Nintendo the rights to publish (that is fund) the game.
animegamingnerd  +   126d ago
well to be fair i think EA had a hand in turning overstrike into that generic shooter fused
j-blaze   126d ago | Trolling | show
Belking  +   126d ago
Nothing wrong with that. After 15 years they deserve to make a cross platform game. I think it's great that studios can pick their own publisher and own their IPs. I hope this stuff happens more in the future.
Hicken  +   126d ago
How do they "deserve" to make a cross-platform game?
Belking  +   126d ago
Because Belking said so.
Soldierone  +   126d ago
My question is what about when things go more digital? The cost to "publish" a game won't be as high. You will pay maybe bandwith fee's and a licensing fee, but thats it. Would a company stable enough to handle it like Insomniac skip the publisher all together and do it themselves?
DBergmark  +   126d ago
Doesn't*
shivvy24  +   126d ago
ily insomniac
black911  +   126d ago
They'll be crying back.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
10°

Preview: Lost Planet 3: Will A Stronger Story Make A Better Game? | DualShockers

5m ago - Masoud House of DualShockers writes: "I’ve been waiting to get my hands on Lost Planet 3 for s... | PC
20°

Amazon offering early access to Final Fantasy XIV A Realm Reborn with pre-order

7m ago - Square Enix announced the ‘Collector’s Edition’ of their upcoming rerelease of ‘Final Fantasy XIV... | PC
10°

Games Inbox: Xbox One conspiracy, Persona 3 choices, and GoldenEye 007

10m ago - EA announces it is getting rid of online passes (which sounds suspiciously generous – unless they... | PS4
20°

Voting Now Open for Black Ops 2 Camo Packs

13m ago - For the next batch of personalization packs in Call of Duty: Black Ops 2, Treyarch is putting the... | Xbox 360
Ad

Soul Sacrifice (Vita) Review

Now - Ryan takes this unique Vita title for a spin and talks to a book. Trust us, just read the review. | Promoted post
10°

Arma 3 Alpha updates to version 0.58

13m ago - Arma 3 Alpha updates to version 0.58 | PC
Related content from friends