230°
Submitted by VGI 611d ago | opinion piece

DmC Critics: "It's Good" DmC Fans: "Waaaaaaaaaaaah"

VGI writes..

"As the embargo lifts on Ninja Theory's new take on the Devil May Cry series, a quick Metacritic search herald’s high praise.

Critics, as of writing this, love it. It's westernised, sure, but its authenticity hasn't changed the formula into something unrecognisable.

With such acclaim, comes a salad bowl of disappointment Something the 'hardcore' fans are quick to respond to." (DmC: Devil May Cry, PS3, Xbox 360)

« 1 2 »
j-blaze  +   611d ago
my god this is so stupid and pathetic, this guy needs to get a life!
Chris_Hyde  +   611d ago
Pot. Kettle. And Black. If you're going to criticise then fair enough, but at least state "why". It helps discussion and is the purpose of the Comments section.
aiBreeze  +   611d ago
Well you just have to look at the title of the article to find a reason to criticize.
360ICE  +   611d ago
Who would have known that actually reading articles would involve *gasp* reading? So people will just look at the title and this process plays out in their head:

Title = provocative
Me = easily provoked, therefore provocative = trolling
Me provoked = me upset
Read article = negative, too upset.
Me upset = Me comment
Blame current state on article because:
Writer = Article
Article = Title
= Insult writer based on title of article

Sure, the article is light fluff, but if people actually agreed with it then they =/= upset and no insult to the writer would follow (probably), so it's kind of a double standard.

Me? No, this is me:
N4G article = write snyde comment
#1.1.2 (Edited 611d ago ) | Agree(19) | Disagree(8) | Report
aiBreeze  +   611d ago
@360ICE

Why would anyone want to read the article with such a title? Describing upset fans as going "Waaaah" makes the article writer sound like he's 10 years old.
360ICE  +   611d ago
@aiBreeze
By all means don't, but then it seems fair to also not make general comments that include the article and the writer.
DragonKnight  +   611d ago
I read the whole thing, and guess what, the article is complete garbage. It's an article designed to insult people with legitimate gripes with the game. One could even say that, were it not for the fact we can see the pathetic grin of the Editor-in-Chief that posted it, Ninja Theory themselves wrote this piece.

Because hey, instead of coming up with valid counterpoints or attempting to have discussion and seeing all sides of the picture, why not use a website to insult people so that said people will visit said site and get said site more money. YAY JOURNALISM WORKS!

Self-important site downvoted.

**EDIT** HAHAHA! To show their schoolyard mentality, the author updated the post and used an out of context quote from my own post. So DmC fans, tell the truth. Do you really want someone like this Bill O'Reilly wannabe representing you?
#1.1.5 (Edited 611d ago ) | Agree(13) | Disagree(7) | Report
Blacktric  +   611d ago
"Played the new DmC? Wondering how well it's fairing? How have the fans reacted to a radical over-haul of Dante's iconic look?

They mad bro."

This is the first paragraph of the article. So please, stop trying to act like it's a bait and switch type of article that uses the headline to make people read an intelligently written piece. It's a couple hundred words worth of biased BS that looks like it's written by an NT employee that specifically quotes comments of people who have no idea what the hell they're talking about while failing to give a proper rebuttal to people with actual concerns.
TheBlackSmoke  +   611d ago
This is no more biased then the hatred that has been spewed forth about it over the last couple of years. The way your'e reacting to this article should give you an idea of how we have to deal with your crap on a constant basis.
SilentNegotiator  +   611d ago
Those stupid fans.

Everyone knows that the only opinion that matters is that of the people being paid by the publishers to advertise the game on their site. THAT is where the most unbias of glorious opinions will spawn from.
/s
#1.1.8 (Edited 611d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(2) | Report
gaffyh  +   611d ago
@VGI - You guys are digging a hole for yourselves here by purposefully insulting a segment of the gaming community. Also, there is a very simple way to destroy this article, and that's with one question; Who's going to buy the game, critics or fans?

If the fans hate it, then what's the point? With that said, I'm very glad that Ninja Theory STFU recently and let the game do the talking because it actually looks like one of the best games to come from Capcom in a long time, although that's not saying much,
adorie  +   611d ago
The title of anything should be indicative to what is inside,not some F***ing bear-trap with a steak in the center, to lure unsuspecting people into reading an article that reflects differently.

I think people lack the imagination to come up with a truthful title that is relative to the content it wants to lead you to.

You don't need to resort to sensationalism to get hits, you can be thoughtful, inventive, imaginative enough to lead people to your article without resorting to half truths and out of context trash.
XB1_PS4  +   610d ago
I went on his twitter, the writer is a constant dick head.
#1.1.11 (Edited 610d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(1) | Report
HarryMasonHerpderp  +   611d ago
Awww this guy is trolling all the DMC haters on N4G hard.
grailly  +   611d ago
I think, with all the trolling (ex)DMC fans spurt out, they deserve at least a bit of trolling in return.
StanSmith  +   611d ago
Totally agree J-blaze.

The author writes this article, taking shots at DMC fans and N4G users whining, then proceeds to whine about said fans while uploading their article to N4G to get hits so they get paid by their advertisers.

The site is a joke and should now be banned from here. Let see how far their crap little blog gets once they no longer have access to N4G. I'm not even a fan of DMC either, but played the demo for the latest outing and I could see how crap it was.

As for "DmC Critics: "It's Good" DmC Fans: "Waaaaaaaaaaaah", not only is this a childish title but something needs straightening out to these "critics".

YOUR opinion doesn't mean a damn thing. WE gamers buy the games. We are the ones who make a game a success or not because we buy them and don't get them for free. Who do developers turn to for opinions on sequels? Gamers! Not critics.

It's about time that these critics get of their damn high horses and stop acting like they're so important in our buying decisions. If i see a game that I like the look of, I'll buy it. I don't need so over-opinionated arse telling me what I can and cannot buy with my hard earned money.
#1.3 (Edited 611d ago ) | Agree(12) | Disagree(14) | Report | Reply
DragonKnight  +   611d ago
Yeah, I don't know who approved this but I'm reporting it as Lame because it's not news, it's just an insult piece. Since when was N4G a site where "journalists" could post their schoolyard B.S.?
creatchee  +   611d ago
You do realize that a good number of game critics are gamers too, right? Just because they are given a forum to give their opinion does not mean that they are any less of a gamer than the rest of us.

Also, the purpose of review is to give an opinion as to the quality and enjoyment of a product. This is not exclusive to the video game industry, as you may well be aware. Reviews do influence people. Reviews are SUPPOSED to influence people. A writer who is voicing their opinion without the intent of having the reader agree with or at least understand said opinion is not a very good writer.

That said, yes reviews matter. The funny thing is, when our expectations of a product coincide with a reviewer's opinion, you don't hear the incessant whining like you do every day on this site and others - you get happiness and rainbows. Nobody is angered when we get what we want.
DragonKnight  +   611d ago
@creachtree: Sorry but, reviews don't really matter as they are far too chaotic to be an effective gauge of anything and there have been many stories of "bought" (not necessarily meaning cash) reviews out there. I mean, Call of Duty is essentially the same game every year and yet every year it receives rave reviews. Then you get exceptionally good games getting poorly reviewed and it turns out that the fans word of mouth saved the game from being doomed to obscurity. Numbered reviews are pointless and cause a lot of division.
StanSmith  +   611d ago
@creatchee

Of course they're gamers. Doesn't change the fact that I buy the game so their opinion doesn't mean jack. Also, just because they have an outlet to voice said opinion, doesn't mean that they can become holier than thou to other gamers.

Also, if reviews are influencing people's buying decisions, then they're sheep. Simple as. Review scores mean nothing. Never have. It's the content of the games that matter. If you think it's something you may like, then buy it. Anyone buying games just because some person with a blog said "10/10 buy, buy, buy" are spiting themselves.

Reviews stopped mattering when the reviewers started hyping up games in previews for months/years until release, only to trash them when they release. They have no credibility anymore.

As for "we" being happy when a game gets good reviews, nope still don't care. Like I said, if I like the look of a game, I'll judge it myself from gameplay videos. From their I can decide whether it is a full priced, on sale or not at all purchase. I've played games long enough to know whether I'll like a game or not. I don't need some random reviewer to make my decisions for me.
#1.3.4 (Edited 611d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(2) | Report
Cablephish  +   611d ago
I lol'd when I saw your comment in the article. 2funny.
torchic  +   611d ago
just because they called you out ahaha
dedicatedtogamers  +   611d ago
Critics also said RE6 was amazing, and that ME3's ending was epic.

And those are just two recent examples...
Halochampian  +   611d ago
RE6 received pretty mediocre reviews.

And most reviewers said that ME3 was amazing but the ending was disappointing.

So those were two bad recent examples
Nimblest-Assassin  +   611d ago
This guy is still updating this article, hell even you got mentioned j-blaze
DragonKnight  +   611d ago
Hey j-blaze, this scholar of an article author posted your comment in his flamebait article. You should be proud man.
thaking155  +   611d ago
Really, I can say this to the guy who wrote the article.....

You're Fat and Balding: WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!

It's not that good. DmC is literally a mix of Heavenly Sword and DmC. Primarily a Heavenly Sword clone with different elements added in.

The Slow/power stance (R1) aka Demon Stance (Press and Hold in R2 in DmC)=Heavenly Sword
The Speed stance (L1) aka Angel Stance (Press and Hold L2 in DmC)=Heavenly Sword.
Where in the originals, pressing a button had that primary weapon chosen and you used and in the middle of a combo you can press it at the drop of a dime and continue the combo rather than in DmC where you press and hold and just "Chain combos together," Aka Button masher. The automatic launcher and the lack of a lock on button.

They added the enemies where they raise their weapons and before they attack the weapons shine . You know where that came from Heavenly Sword, not Devil May Cry. QT Events came from Heavenly Sword and God of War NOT Devil May Cry!

You say they can traverse the landscape with the angel weapon and bring enemies to you/go to the enemies. I say that is a Nero element of the Devil Bringer that does not suit Dante. Gave the guy unlimited air time, which in previous games the air time could be extended but not unlimited! Devil Trigger and powers are just awakened but yet strong enough to **** ****** (Spoiler) Hmm doesn't even make sense because in DMC 1, He was fully developed with his powers and **** ******.
VGI  +   611d ago
I prefer the term "Rotund" and "follicly challenged".

Thanks!

xxxxxx
thaking155  +   611d ago
Hahaha Nice!! I give you that one guy!

Cheers!
Mounce  +   611d ago
I agree with you j-blaze and also want to point this out....

DmC Critics and DmC fans? As if the original series was called DmC.... DmC is the Recent games' name while the predecessors are Devil May Cry or DMC really....

This guy wants to cause a flame war, it's not really commendable or brave, just stupid, of course.

That and the nonsense that is, he says Fans of DmC are whining about DmC? How can a Fan(Person who is a fan of a game) whine about a game they're a fan about? It's clear that if people dislike a game, they are not fans of it....So correlating DmC Fans and a response of 'WAAAAAAAAAAH' is a bit illogical, no? :P
VileAndVicious  +   611d ago
Have to admit...this was a little....mean. lol
andshesays  +   611d ago
it was obvious this game was gonna get a great review, I loved the hold Devil May Cry, but im liking the style and the direction this DMC is going, great stuff
Ezz2013  +   611d ago
i didn't play it yet
but they way it look and they way dante look
don't feel right with me
and the way he say F*** alot and i mean alot
make me feel bad of what they have done with DMC
that's not dante i used to love and care about in ps2 era

i don't know about the story and the Gameplay look alright
so i won't jude story and gameplay yet
but i don't have much faith in those too
#4 (Edited 611d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(11) | Report | Reply
JasonXS12  +   611d ago
Shut up the DMC articles. I don't think anyone cares anymore.
GreenRanger  +   611d ago | Funny
DmC Critics: "It's good".
DMC Fans: "Waaaaaaah".
Journalists: "Thanks for the cash" *slurp, gulp, slurp, gulp*
VGI  +   611d ago | Funny
You forgot crunch. Doritos make a 'crunch' sound.
zerocrossing  +   611d ago
All of the bubbles for you!!!
Hicken  +   611d ago
Your comments are funny. Your article is not.
Nimblest-Assassin  +   611d ago
You'd think Capcom would have used that cash for RE6 instead of DmC
Neckbear  +   611d ago
Well, most reviewers, the creator of this article included, are 13. How could they not dislike a game where you mash one button to get an SSS rating and the protagonist is all edgy and curses and stuff? It's obviously GOTY for them!
VGI  +   611d ago
Not GOTY. GOTC.

GAME OF THE CENTURY!!!!!
zerocrossing  +   611d ago
Reviewers say it's good original fans say it's not, reviewers get goody bags, original fans get the finger.

No matter what, you are not going to get a non biased opinion till sometime after its official release.
Ezz2013  +   611d ago
"original fans get the finger."

NT did that in real life
and they did it in the game as well
just to make sure DMC real fans got the message

Related image(s)
#8.1 (Edited 611d ago ) | Agree(12) | Disagree(5) | Report | Reply
-GametimeUK-  +   611d ago
Reviewers opinions do not take the previous games in to much consideration. It is reviewed for what it is intended to be.

The Devil May Cry die hard's will only focus on what is different from the original series.

Who's opinion is more trustworthy?
Chris_Hyde  +   611d ago
The only opinion that ultimately matters is your own. Whether you think you will like it or not. All this other stuff going on is just White Noise.
zerocrossing  +   611d ago
If you want something to be based off its own merit then it's better to make it a new IP, don't link it to a previously successful franchise to gain attention and tell us that we're wrong for expecting it to be similar to the originals and then give us the middle finger when we're not impressed.

Capcom and NT are trying to have their cake and eat it too.
Whitefox789  +   610d ago
Then I would say reviewers are not doing their jobs justice.
-GametimeUK-  +   610d ago
@zero

I guess the new Batman movies should never have been made then since they are a reboot. For them movies to be based off their own merit they shouldn't have been Batman movies.
N4Flamers  +   610d ago
The new batman movies are not judged on their own merit. Every time we watch them we remember the batman movies of the past and how these movies improved on those. If NT would have improved on Dante as a character and not given us a pretentious teenage rebel, then I'm sure the fans would love him. If they would have improved on the gameplay not just tacked on heavenly sword controls then I'm sure the fans would love it also.

People just don't see this game as an improvement over the old ones and they have legitimate gripes.
N4GDgAPc  +   611d ago
I say thats pretty much almost false. about 80% of the haters do not say there opinion. They pretty much say what others opinions are (which is false) and state them as fact. There some that actually say there opinions on why but when they start adding excusing that have no relation to the game then it starts getting retarded. Like NT insulting fans. That has nothing to do if the game is going to suck or not. Or Capcom must be buying out these reviews becasue there is no way anyone likes this game.

Its like the haters have it dead set in there mind that everyone hates the game. The ones that like the game think they do but they really don't.

I do think there is some that already decided they would hate the game so nothing NT could do to change that.

Now stop saying the game sucks when you haven't played the full game. I can understand u didn't like the demo so your not going to waist your money on the game. why spend $60 when I can get something else? Thats reasonable.

But who knows. The rest of the game could of been fun and that one part of the demo u hated. Thats why u should never know if you like the game or not.
DEATHxTHExKIDx  +   611d ago
I only played DMC4 but, this new DMC was pretty solid the demo at least of what Id played. Id be willing to drop 40$ for this game when it goes down in price.
Eyeco  +   611d ago
Go back and play the other DMC1 and especially DMC3, you should like them considering the fact that DMC4 was absolute cr@p
Sevir  +   610d ago
LMAO!!! ok if you say so
DMC4 is pretty much a carbon copy of DMC3, the only problems DMC4 had was the insane amount of back tracking fighting Bosses over. And Thats the reason why The game was rebooted because HARDCORE FANS looked at DMC4 and thought meh! More of the same. and now that the franchise has been rebooted, suddenly you want it to go back to what it use to be!
Eyeco  +   611d ago
Go back and play DMC1 and especially DMC3, you should like them considering the fact that DMC4 was arguably the worst next to 2
#9.2 (Edited 611d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(8) | Report | Reply
Pozzle  +   611d ago
Are articles like this really necessary? All they do is piss people off and try to cause more controversy (which is something DmC doesn't really need at this point). I mean, the Call of Duty games get great reviews and amazing sales, but you don't see so-called professional game sites writing a bunch of "Haha! Suck on that, CoD haters!" or "Waaaah waaaah, haters!" articles every time a new CoD is released. Because that would be juvenile.

Seriously, what is the author's intention here? To get hits? To piss people off? To cause arguments? Because it's not going to change anybody's mind about the game. Those who aren't interested in the game aren't going to buy it, and those who ARE interested in the game will buy it regardless.
#10 (Edited 611d ago ) | Agree(19) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
Ezz2013  +   611d ago
you are infected with logic,open mind and commonsense..
i better call the national guard before you infect the whole N4G site
Ippiki Okami  +   611d ago
"Seriously, what is the author's intention here? To get hits? To piss people off? To cause arguments? Because it's not going to change anybody's mind about the game."

Yes. Its called yellow journalism, the UK is infamous for this. Why do you think we have TMZ here in the states now?

Looks like N4G just found a new partner to create hits and exploit more sensationalist content....wonderful.
Max-Zorin  +   611d ago
I had a good laugh watching the DMC review.
Acquiescence  +   611d ago
I'm not going to lie...
It's fun watching all the DMC fans squirm right now in response to all the positive reception the reboot is receiving, not just from journalists but folks who have picked up the game early through whatever means. They desperately wage their war against a video game in the vain hope that their influence will cease its existence and bring back to precedence the original iteration, and on the cusp of DmC's release, this is when they scream their loudest.

"Waaaaaaaaaaaah" indeed. It's pathetic.
csreynolds  +   611d ago
Oh look, DmC turned out to be a great game after all. Many gamers like it. Pretty much every site that's reviewed it likes it - GameTrailers, Destructoid, Xbox Magazine, Edge, GameSpot, Kotaku, IGN, Push Square, OPM...

Bravo Ninja Theory. May your haters enjoy that piece of humble pie they're eating...
Baka-akaB  +   611d ago
What a nice collection of sites some people here couldnt stand not even a month ago .

And what a shallow , hollow , and petty victory . Didnt Enslaved garner 100% approval and praises from the same press ? And yet did it matter ? nope , not in the least .

Almost no one expected bad scores for the games , so eat your own pie before it gets too cold
#13.1 (Edited 611d ago ) | Agree(9) | Disagree(8) | Report | Reply
csreynolds  +   611d ago
A) DmC is not Enslaved (didn't think I'd need to point that out)
B) a petty victory is just deserts for the petty collective of gamers that have done nothing but bash Ninja Theory from the moment they realised 'new Dante' wouldn't have white hair

Face it, had DmC got poor reviews across the board, the haters would be screaming "ha ha" at the top of their lungs, so I'll make you a deal; I'll reheat my pie if you stop calling me black, Pot...

Best,
'Kettle'
Baka-akaB  +   611d ago
A. It's still a game that only met critical praise , without any effect on its sales . Same will goes for DmC imo , it will flops or succeed based on the strength of the franchise mostly .

B. I'm sure some would be happy ... again i just wouldnt care . I've been vocal enough about how little i care about most of those sites' opinion about games , way before the whole dmc thing .

Dont expect me to conjure some "capcom bought them" theory either , i just chalk it up to their usual flaws and short comings .

Finally i dont have to call you anything , who are you again ? I care about the franchise and only need to discuss that , not some sore gang of winner/losers .
#13.1.2 (Edited 611d ago ) | Agree(7) | Disagree(6) | Report
-GametimeUK-  +   611d ago
Plenty of games have had critical praise and poor sales. If DmC does go down this route does it really matter? It comes down to the point that NT pulled through and gave us a great game to play.

Okami flopped in the sales department. At least the game was great and that is what matters and that is what the fans will remember.
Baka-akaB  +   611d ago
I does matter if you dont want the NT path to be the roadmap for the franchise . Obviously some of you do and think it's still a great game , i dont .

I'm just in wait and see mode . Waiting to see if it's the decided path , and then i'll just give up on the franchise ... or if it goes elsewhere .
AdmiralSnake  +   611d ago
Yeah and th funny thing is the reviewers are praising two key areas the elitist been complaining about.

1. Story
2. The combat

Anyway I can't wait to download my copy when 12:01 am hits. Hope everyone enjoys the game!
Moncole  +   611d ago
Ninja Theory makes good games, I would be surprised if it was bad.
vanethe  +   611d ago
although i had problem and still do with the DMC ,i didnt say anything that i like in the game , the voice acting is ok , it doesnt have the witty humor it had , it's should me name NTMC...
Baka-akaB  +   611d ago
What i love the most is seeing folks around here whom couldnt stand the press and accuse them of all ills , suddenly feeling validated and "proven right" about DmC being good .

This is the truly pathetic aspect of the affair . The press does it's job as usual , badly or not , why feel the need to gloat about their opinions ?

Who expected bad scores after months of them praising the game ? And after praising the previous games from Ninja theory .

All i can say is , i'm not surprised , still dont care about their input , and that what matters ultimately is weither or not the game fails or succeed in sales , to decide once and for all the fate of the franchise .

I dont need to repeat wich outcome would "please" me most .
#15 (Edited 611d ago ) | Agree(9) | Disagree(4) | Report | Reply
iNMyFiN4LH0uR  +   611d ago
If you pass judgement on a game based on how much it sells....well then I don't know what to say to that.

But if you want the game to fail in the sales department because you don't like the direction that NT took, that is a respectable opinion, minus the fact you want a great game to fail.

The game is good, in fact, I'm going to be brave here and say it's actually faithful to what DMC is. You see there is a consensus, not just among the publications you hate but across most publications, that is why the game holds an aggregate score of 85 on metacritic right now.

I honestly hope NT pursues this direction, as I've said before, DMC has always been about reconciling style with combat not difficulty and combat. Much too often people develop a false sense of proficiency just because they've played the "originals".
Whitefox789  +   610d ago
Well I guess it pretty much sucks for someone like me since I never approved of big developers outsourcing their franchises to other developers (hell I hate using outsourced code at work). It was not just appearances that made me dislike what DmC was to become it goes much further for the clashes of ideals between east and west where I was attracted to the DMC franchise for its eastern appeal.

Though I stand by my choice and will have nothing to do with this game though that was more of a deciding factor on Tameem's software development methodology which I think is absurd from a professional standpoint. If you want my full view on this feel free to PM me.

http://www.ps3center.net//n...

Got myself in a catch-22 if the re imaging succeeds the franchise will continue to go into a direction that me and other people don't approve of. If it fails in sales then the series is more then likely going to be gone.

People seem to not understand that it is people that make these games, if you take the people out of what made the games great in the first place your taking the original soul away from it. Look at the Silent Hill franchise after Team Silent left Konami no Silent Hill title has overcome the pinnacle of the series which was Silent Hill 2.
Coolmanrico  +   611d ago
I lost interest in this game months ago. Good or bad, I won't be buying it. There are just too many better games coming out within the next three months.
MoveTheGlow  +   611d ago
After reading this article and a few of the more trustable reviews (Polygon, Eurogamer), I can see why fans are pissed, yet reviewers are "Well, some things are good." The reboot brought about really stupid characters trying to be gritty, a la Arkham City's PG-13-strapped inmates who just say the B word all of the time.

The boss you fight in the demo is exactly what Eurogamer's talking about - they basically put how to kill the guy in neon lights. The dialogue's just as awful as Polygon says it is - "F You" over and over isn't funny when it's done like it's a serious retort. The bit about the end boss is really, really disappointing. That's like the bread and butter of a good action game - look at Bayonetta! You ride a motorcycle up a rocketship to fight God in that game, and it's amazing. The next big action game should one-up that, not flop!

Neither of them mentioned the framerate, which is a huge dealbreaker for me, but I understand that not every consumer cares about that.

Basically, if you want more Devil May Cry, you'll want to take a blowtorch to this game. If you're interested in Devil May Cry but never played it, this is no good intro, the characters are horrible. But it's still... technically... alright. I guess. It'll be a steal at five bucks in a bargain bin. I'll wait three months for it to be free on Playstation Plus :P
#17 (Edited 611d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
GenoZStriker  +   611d ago
As it currently stands, the game is rated below DMC1, DMC3:SE, DMC3 and DMC4 on Metacritic on the PS3 and below DMC1, DMC3:SE on the Xbox 360. If anything it's exactly what most critics of this game expected.
#18 (Edited 611d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
Godmars290  +   611d ago
All I know is that if the game doesn't sell well, the the rift between gamers and reviewers will be all but official. That one just doesn't represent the other. That reviews don't matter or influence what games people buy.

That the industry is just spinning on itself.
InTheLab  +   611d ago
Critics aren't the ones that will be buying this game. They got a copy for free. Once a year goes past and the game sells slightly better than their last title....well, we all know what will happen.

fans with money > critics
MacDonagh  +   611d ago
I played the demo and I liked it.

However, I understand why fans would be a bit miffed by the whole thing. Having seen a good number of franchises that I've loved crash and burn last year, I know that feeling too well but I will wait until I play the full game before I make any pronouncements.
Donnywho  +   611d ago
Someone should write an article about the journalists who write articles about the fans who write reviews.
Eamon  +   611d ago
I watch Ryan Clements' review on IGN and I never felt so much cringe in a game review since Greg Miller's Uncharted 2 nerdgasm.

It's like everyone's forgotten about Devil May Cry 3 and have completely downgraded their standards. Ryan Clements knew he couldn't avoid talking about the low difficulty and so tried to whitewash it by claiming it was 'designed to be fair; not easy.'

And the swearing in the video review really changed my opinion of Ryan Clements too.
#23 (Edited 611d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
brich233  +   611d ago
if you played through the worst DMC ever(dmc2) then you should be able to play through this.
palaeomerus  +   611d ago
Okay. Taunt me all you want for not liking what I am seeing. Is that going to make me buy it somehow? I actually loved enslaved but I frankly just don't want this. You hear "waaaaah." I hear a cash register not ringing up. Whatevs.
#25 (Edited 611d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
Shotcalm  +   611d ago
in my opinion this franchise has been so bad from the start...
League_of_Draven  +   611d ago
Watching fallout of DMC "fans" cry about the good reviews is hilarious. I haven't had this good of a laugh since people were upset that Bayonetta 2 was a Wii U exclusive.
xJumpManx  +   611d ago
Let the arguments begin the IGn reviewer states the PS3 version is choppy and laggy and that you should go 360 if you have both consoles. Personally I am so far behind on last years games DMC is not going to be a buy for me.
BuffMordecai  +   610d ago
Watching people defend this game is hilarious, it like watching a person eat shit. Funny and disturbing. Equivalent of a twilight fangirl defending their movies.

Related image(s)
#29 (Edited 610d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
whoyouwit04  +   610d ago
The so called DMC fans are not fans but grown ass men living with there parents that have nothing better to do then complain about what the character looks like in a video game,
By the way I'm not knocking any one staying with there parents I know times are though and some people are forced to move back home.
« 1 2 »

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
20°

Take A Look At StreetSmash In Super Smash Bros. For 3DS

35m ago - Today on Miiverse, director of Smash Bros - Masahiro Sakuria - has shared a glimpse of StreetSmas... | Wii U
30°

Super Smash Bros 3DS demo – First Impressions | TechRaptor

35m ago - The latest installment of the Super Smash Bros series is coming to the 3DS in a little under 3 we... | 3DS
20°

GamesAsylum - Super Monkey Ball Bounce - Review

37m ago - GamesAsylum: "Back in 2003, Sega took EA to court, claiming The Simpsons Road Rage was uncannily... | Mobile
30°

Uriel’s Chasm Review | Hardcore Gamer

41m ago - “What in the hell is this game?” are likely the first words that ran through your mind when looki... | PC
Ad

Study Game Design at DeVry

Now - DeVry University, is an accredited* university offering you the flexibility of over 90 locations, online courses and a wide variety of bachelor's a... | Promoted post
30°

Flockers Review | WGTC

43m ago - Paul from We Got This Covered wrote: If you’ve ever played the well-known Amiga classic Lemmin... | PC
Related content from friends