Digitally Downloaded writes: "It's a pity, because CD Projekt Red games are incredible. The Witcher 2 is my favourite western-style RPG since the original Baldur's Gate, as cringeworthy as its portrayal of women is. I have no doubt whatsoever that this game will also be incredible.
So why the heck do they feel like they need to prove the critics of the games industry right?"
And if I'm a guy, and I love girls, and I'm the key demographic why shouldnt the devs cater to me?
And why should I be made to feel bad about that?
"Whatcha got there? A game with a woman that is half-dressed?!!?! OMG DATS SEXIST!!!"
Most games feature attractive males and females. What we have here is an exaggerated issue, I tell you what.
While more sexist stuff is being projected into minds of minors by the mainstream media?
Damn world went wrong. And stupid.
Enhancing the items beyond their normal form to heighten their attractiveness.
http://enhancingmylife.blog...
I'm not for objectifying women, but let's face it...we're animals. If someone wants to provide me a beautiful woman to look at, there's nothing wrong with that. I don't get all bent out of shape over Marcus, Drake, Depp or Pitt... If women have a problem with beautiful women, maybe they should try being beautiful themselves. As it is now, it seems like women who complain about this stuff are just jealous. OF A CARTOON. It's pathetic. Therapy worthy, even.
I actually think cdprojekt is ahead of its time as far as incorporating sex in games.. In the industry today it's still considered taboo to go very far with it even though Hollywood goes much further.
Cdprojekt games such as Witcher 2 also has a more grown up / mature feel to it.. I give them props for everything they do...
FACT!
Another term that has become a buzzword.
http://geekrevolt.com/2012/...
http://images3.wikia.nocook...
It has always been my stance that there is nothing wrong with sexuality existing in games, but at some point it gets goddamn boring seeing the same characters portrayed with different sexy skins.
Again though, just speaking generally. I am VERY excited for 2077.
Submit another article like this MattS and I will block you and hopefully anything you submit.
Don't disrespect Cyberpunk 2077 without having the full game in your hand and actually witnessing the way it is meant to be portrayed. Right now everything your writing is an assumption. We all know what that means.
Why would I want to play "Irritating, Lumpy, Lady in the Grocery-Store Simulator 2013"?
Nothing in this trailer suggests that the person will play or look like that the whole game. Seeing one scantily clad woman throughout does not suggest the direction of the game similar to how the nuns in Hitman: Absolution are not in the whole game either.
Geralt having sex with hookers and collecting saucy cards with their picture on it isn't sexist but the new CD Projekt trailer is...I see.
The stupidity here is that when the first Witcher game was released these dumb liberal "writers" were screeching about "misogyny" and sexism yet here this noob is praising them...you just have to shake your head.
Fake scandal is fake, like RE5 was "racist" but "no Russian" wasn't a problem, White protagonists slaying waves of Africans "The Horror!", White protagonists slaying waves of Whites..meh...
You could argue that the violence was worse in CoD2, but there is a big difference between white psychopaths shooting up white civilians, and a white heroic protagonist with arms the size of melons killing hordes of African tribals throwing spears at you from their swamp huts...
Also got from the trailer that the woman being shot at was the same as the one in the copper suiting up at the very end.
Wait, what? What?
Two women in what could be in different positions of the same situation who both have the exact same scar on their cheek.
What is it with the baldness?
It's automatically not okay for a hail of bullets to be fired upon a female robot, but it'd be a-okay for a hail of bullets fired upon a dude.
Put simply: you're reaching. I guess you can take comfort in the fact that you're not the only one, but... really, you should stop. As a female commenter on the article said, you're doing no one any good.
It's great that you want to end sexism in gaming, but you have to KNOW WHAT SEXISM IS FIRST. You, obviously, do not. Rather, you are superimposing a projection of sexism onto a situation where none is present.
Ironic that you talk about the video having a lack of context, and then supply your own in the way of screaming "SEXISM!!!!"
Pathetic.
Too bad I was born a white, middle class male. I never fit into any minority, thus have no 'right' to complain. Even so, I wouldn't exactly call females a minority.
Just look at what happened with miss alabama and the rose bowl. 99% of people disagree with all the complaints about an announcer calling a pageant winner beautiful. but you only hear the ignorant 1% in the news.
Because most do, regardless of gender.
Boys want to be powerful men because that's what females find sexy, power.
Way to insult others to instead of admitting what a piece of crap this article is.
There are real issues when it comes to sexism in society, and the objectification of women is one of them, but far from the most important. Women, and men, have been objectified for centuries, and have had varying degrees of respect and rights within those different societies.
In a way, a man trying to bring about this discussion is a form of sexism in itself. It's shows an underlying need to be some sort of protector of the weak. In addition it is based off a moral stance which seeks to box in society cutting off expression as a form of voice.
Quite simply, a laughable "article".
Also, I found it very amusing that the author of that stupid article found a "half-naked women positioned in a submissive position" to be more alarming than the half dozen or more bloody corpses of the people she had just murdered.
If anything stood out, it was the fact that she was impervious to bullets, had huge fold-out blades jutting from her arms, and was soaked in blood and surrounded by several of her victims' corpses. But what stood out in this guys mind was that she was female and in a submissive position. WTF?
It would be strange playing a game where you can instal chainguns in your body but everyone (in the game world) are too shy to show any bare skin.
Of course the trailer did remind me of the aftermath of the Sandy Hook massacre. Allowing powerful implants that could make people go crazyis almost like giving unstable people easy access to guns debate.
It's marketing, and most people who play video games are in their early 30's and under, so of course they're going to put a good looking woman in the game.
http://kotaku.com/5028019/s...
http://www.gamepolitics.com...
People will always find something to complain about, and use anything they can to try and spread an agenda.
Good effort though.
Good effort on your assumption that I didn't read though.
Just cause the trailer showed a very beautiful women in revealing attire it is considered sexist now? Did they even see the whole trailer where this women laid waist to the people around her after being psychologically affected?
Honestly watch the entire trailer, do some ACTUAL RESEARCH ,that's what most journalist do right? So you can spare us the effort to waste our time with this garbage.
Take this trailer. If they did their research about the Cyberpunk series which has spanned pen & paper games, novels etc. they would know that this lady has underwent body altering procedures. However the more procedures a person goes through the less & less the person has grasping at what is real & what is not. The trailer shows that this lady has encountered a psychotic break & killed many in the process. The police are there to subdue her while the cool looking gentleman behind her is a special agent dispatched specifically to deal with 'rouge' patients. I believe just when the dude is about to pull the trigger the lady wakes up from her psychotic break.
The trailer is very well presented in showing this event happening & to have this person question whether it is sexist is comical & clearly has not seen or read much about any of this & the source material is based on.
Me saying you're grabbing for attention isn't being complicit with sexism. I'm just refusing to be complicit with poor criticism. This isn't a trailer we're supposed to take at face value. This trailer is eye candy because THAT'S WHAT A TEASER IS. Are there probably a couple people going, "ooh, boobies, yay!"? Well, yeah. Teenagers exist. But clearly the point is to make the audience ask "why is this women in the middle of a pile of bodies? Why is she bulletproof? Why does she have freaking arm blades?" It's out of context, so now we all want to know what's going on, so now we'll be following their game! Mission accomplished!
A sexist ad would have just been "hey, we got boobs." This one is "Hey, we got intrigue and interesting world-building... and maybe some boobs on the side."
And honestly? If I was sexy and bullet-proof, I'd be flaunting what I got.
There's an actual hidden message from the team at CDPR explaining the reasoning behind the teaser. Why there is no gameplay, a window for release, etc.
But I wonder why you assume they did this to "spark" controversy. The Tomb Raider BS was a stretch but at least there was something controversial to latch on to.
The teaser was there to give those who familiar with the "lore" an idea of what CDPR wants to do.
People need to calm down, guys like things like boobs and nice legs. its a fact. Girls like.... IDK muscled backs and masculinity or something. No one wants what you would probably consider non sexist, i sure as hell dont want to watch 300 pound Americans having heart attacks for 20 hours, but dont worry, its not sexist.
Did you even consider the possibility that maybe she's faking surrender in order to wait for a surprise attack with those, you know, friggin' huge arse blades coming out of her arms? Do we see what happens after she closes her eyes? I bet what comes after is a scene in which the half-robot lady attacks your strong masculine figure standing behind her with those blades and slice him up like a piece of watermelon. I mean, seriously now... How could someone so menacing like her can be regarded as being in a submissive position just due to the fact that she's on her knees? She looks more like a monster to me, for Christ's sake, with all those augmentations which makes her deadly. And deadly is NOT innocent, so acting like the woman in this trailer is an innocent young lady who's captured by force and about to be executed for no reason, is pointless. Did you see the pile of dead bodies left by your no-harm-doing lady?
I'm sorry but I find it hard to consider this trailer sexist, and I don't see why you're making an issue out of this when it's obvious that she's not intentionally put in that position to cater your tetosterones. Her having a fit body in the context of the story is not absurd anyway as she's augmented. And let's be honest here for a second, if you had the chance to enhance your body with surgical enhancements, would you tell your doctor "Hey doc, I want you to make me as fat as i can be, because you know, I don't want my body to be materialized by the evil society." Everybody wants to be adored and there's not a single person on this planet that doesn't want to look sexy, if they tell otherwise they're lying. So, we all want to look like her and be adored like her, and we're getting pissed when we see someone like her or a handsome guy like Nathan? That's pure bollokcs, my dear friends.
Let alone this lady is probably designed to be a soldier and that explains why she has a fit physique.
I NEED THIS NOW
It's a good teaser and it's CDPR and anyone that has seen me post about them know how much I love them as devs.
Remember to vote the site down, folks.