Forbes - Here’s what I’d like to see;
Take Full Advantage of Gaikai Acquisition
Sony, you spent $380 million to buy Gaikai, don’t let it go to waste. Full integration with Gaikai (online streaming games, like OnLive) means
In order to get a purchase out of me, they need to keep the PSN free & Killzone 4 must be a launch title.
What about Resistance 4? Or Uncharted 4?
You have 3 basic categories for potential consumers. 1. Those that will buy it no matter what. They are the ones likely to buy the system on day one. So to them it doesn't matter what Sony does. They are loyal and will fight tooth and nail making sure they get their recognition and paint the most positive light their way. 2. The diplomatic. One who waits to see what will be offered and one who is cautiously optimistic. They take a bit more convincing but in the end it's about value and software. 3. The hardened gamer. One who needs a a lot of convincing. A pessimistic potential consumer who will look for all the flaws and is eager to jump all over any mistake. All 3 could be PS4 owners. All I know is I'm not about to rush out and buy any of the new systems, including the Wii U. Not in a market so convoluted with politics and backroom exclusive deals. There's no reason for me to be loyal to any of them even though in the past they have brought a lot of fun. This isn't the days of only one choice like the Atari 2600. So you won't be seeing me standing out in the rain 6 hours before the door opens so I can get my cold hands on one.
I never said i don't want them. http://24.media.tumblr.com/...
Planetside 2 needs to be playable on PS4 on ultra. This would be the shooter for the PS4. If they do, they better fix/copy the way people use mics in MAG. 48 people + outsiders talking to your ears is annoying.
In order to get a purchase from me all they have to do is to keep PSN free.
They need to market the shit out if it, and let people know it has awesome games!!!!
I'd take a Wipeout launch title over Killzone 4, personally. It seems incredibly doubtful though given the loss of Sony Liverpool, which is a shame. Still, if it launches at the end of 2013 it's a safe assumption that we'll see Modern Warfare 4 and Battlefield 4 accompanying the launch. I think putting Killzone 4 out there alongside them might not be the wisest use of their first party studios.
I heard Studio Liverpool were really really far ahead with the next-generation Wipeout game, and since the Studio Liverpool peeps moved in with Evolution Studios it probably will get completed. it's pretty much a given so don't fret :D I want a new Wipeout as much as you do. there's nothing that parades Sony hardware like a Wipeout game, ever since the PSone days. I would love to have Battlefield 4 and Imfamous 3 on launch. Infamous on PS4, that's the dream!
I'd personally love to see GT6 as a launch title *drools*
Those 2 go without question, PSN will be free obviously with cross game chat as well with the optional plus subscription, there will be an exclusive launch title obviously, maybe not Killzone 4 most likely the new IP GG is working and that will be fine and dandy. What Sony needs to take in consideration is the pricing, because lets be realistic the pricing is what really bit the PS3 in the a$$ at launch despite the fact that Sony managed to pull through especially with all the media hate, could you imagine where the PS3 would be had it launched at half the price, i know it would have been extremely unlikely but just imagine. Also it needs to be developer friendly, so this poses another question will Sony keep the cell despite the fact than in 2012 are still incompetent to get the hang of developing ? or will they neglect it for the sake of those incompetent devs if so wouldn't that effect BC ? thats the real question.
PS3 was definitely worth the price tag though, it launched with a blu ray player, built in wifi, HDMI ports, wireless rechargeable battery free controllers. It took the 360 a few years to get some of those features on there console. I am not worried about PS4s price tag.
Obviously to people like me and you the PS3 was worth the price tag and was a worthy investment, but to the average joe $600 was extremely steep. especially when at the time the 360 offered the gamer so much more. The PS4 price tag won't be a problem to me I'll buy it regardless but again to the average joe, they will be looking at affordability especially in today's economic climate
Definitely more exclusive content is a good start. Keep the price reasonable; anything above $400 is simply not going to work as a launch price. Finally, excite gamers; if you're going to give it a new controller, make sure it's something brand new and groundbreaking. A new action IP perhaps? A new control style? Rumor has it there's a VR type visor that's in development for the console which sounds really cool. That's just my thoughts on it anyway.
Sony must sell Sony ATV Sony classics music lable now while it's valuable, keep Adele and other modern singers, and use the money to buy more AAA game publishers/studios. They must have the most powerful console, it must be focused on games rather than being a set-up top box like MS next console is rumoured to be. Utilize Gakai in a unique way, keep internet free and the opperating system should be an Android hybrid so it can support mobile in-put similiar to Smart-Glass as well as the vita. Most Imporatantly ADVERTISE!
Idk if i'd like some of what he talked about but being able to watch ur friends play games sounds preety sweet. I'm just don't want everthing digital..... something great about having a case with game in your hand.
A powerful console Non-sophisticated architecture Continuous 1st party momentum Continue to support 3rd parties more Live IPTV streaming (freeview/cable/sky etc) Better VOD support and execution Snappy OS Smooth application switching Bring across SOE titles Improve the game patching policy/make games easier to patch/smaller patches Seamless downloads/patches in the background Shift streaming services to Gaikai/Sony Streaming (Video/Music/Games/IP TV etc)
1. Not implement that ridiculous anti-used game patent.
2. $400 launch price
3. Continue what they've been doing this gen, release great games and keep PSN free. But cut down fluff games that nobody is going to buy (see Ps move heroes, Q force, all for one, PASBR)
I agree with your list friend except PASBR isn't a game of fluff.. Peace
Why shouldn't they combat used game sales when they can offer rentals through Gaikai or Full Game Trials like they currently do now for PS+ members. Also they could always bring prices down or drop them faster, they just won't have to worry about retailers always low balling them by charging atleast $5 cheaper for used games. I welcome the stopping of used games if its done correctly. It could simply just mean they lock out the game regardless of any sort of online pass so if you buy the game in any form that isn't New you must pay some sort of fee so the makers of the game get some sort of cut. But that fee may just be the difference of price between the brand new version physical/digital and used, so it makes it worth it or cheaper to buy new. I feel good Devs should get their cut. If you like the demo, trial or rental you had then support them and buy the game new. If you didn't like it then pass and look for another game. You will/should have more then enough outlets to know if the game is something you will like. Also if we want bigger, better, more indepth, advanced and blockbuster styled games devs will need more money. On the other hand if we want simple, smart, intelligent, basic games and artsy adventures from indie devs then they really need all the money and recognition they can get. A true gamer would support this if its done right.
I disagree with your anti-used game patent. Why is it ridiculous?
I agree. Instead of complaining, people should either get a job and pay the developers instead of the used game leeches, or learn to manange patience and respect the people who are creating the games that you love. Sure, the mechanism might be anti-consumer in the sense that used games are an established legal product, but used sales are anti-developer and certain studios are shut down if their game doesn't sell a certain number. You can blame Sony or Microsoft, play the selfish teenage angst, blame the developer for "not making a better game", or perhaps grow up.
1.Easy to develop for 2.Advertisement 3. A new OS
Look at nintendo and ms and copy them lol. Since they both gained marketshare its best to follow the leaders.
A launch price no more than €450, keep PSN free, keep PS+ going, keep the Dualshock, some next gen worthy launch titles. Basically an upgraded PS3. Don't fix what isn't broken.
This list is stupid. 1. The online infrastructure doesn't exist to take full advantage of cloud gaming, not unless you live in Japan. This is not necessary for Sony to be successful with the PS4. 2. No optical drive model is a terrible idea. One of the best things the PS3 did was have every unit come with a harddrive which saved developers a lot of headaches. 3. No. Just no. 4. Playstation Mobile fool. 5. Will never happen. Not unless it's completely digital. Retail stores don't want to appear to be smut peddlers with AO rated games. And again, it's not necessary for PS4's success. 6. F*** NO! Are you serious? Was this list created while you were high? Sony does not need to invent a better device than the Kinect. Kinect is crap and the core gamers of the Playstation brand have been vocal, and proved with their wallets, that they like traditional controls better. PS Vita and Playstation Mobile can already easily be allowed to have PS4 integration. This writer is clueless. You hate to be a doubter? Your article is filled with pointless crap (except maybe Gaikai) and it's clear you're an Apple fanboy. This article is ridiculous. Don't read it people, seriously, save your brain cells.
to be fair, it's forbes, so... obvious troll article is obvious. not even going to give it the satisfaction of a click.
True. I'd vote them down, but forbes will never be blacklisted from this site.
Continue to provide excellent first party support, keep the current PSN plan (basic free, PS Plus), give us great hardware - 1080p 60fps, keep the Dualshock, don't launch too late, Blu-ray, make full use of Gaikai and have backwards compatibility if possible.
besides the obvious hardware upgrade i want Motorstorm World Tour as ps4 title and i will be pre ordering the system as soon as it becomes available. Next Gen Lunatics Unite!!!!
One other thing i want to see, its already mentioned in the article but i dont know if its possible, is the ability to record gameplay then we could have an easier time making machinimas :D Besides that, new ips and sequels :)
Affordability, free PSN, easier to code and the exclusives to differentiate it from the crowd. Oh, and convince the gaming press to stop smoking Microsoft pole.
i want backwards compatible at least for ps3
A new business model.
MULTIPLE SIGN-IN! INDIVIDUAL TROPHY GAINING IN MULTIPLAYER
PSN free, PS Plus for PS4 and have amazing quality first party games.
Sounds good it may even help Sony a bit if they launch PS4 with free 3 month PS plus subscriptions. I am pretty sure the basic psn service will remain free.
Just make the ps4 what made the PS1 & PS2 so great.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.