Top
100°

Skyrim One Year On: Why Fallout New Vegas Is Better

Skyrim and Fallout New Vegas are two of the best sandbox RPGs of the current generation; the former widely hailed as the best of its kind. Joe at Cinelinx takes a controversial look at why New Vegas is in fact better than the Nordic classic.

Read Full Story >>
cinelinx.com
The story is too old to be commented.
Psychotica1275d ago

Not sure what it was about Fallout New Vegas but I couldn't get into it at all. Loved Fallout 3 though.

Kran1275d ago

I think it was the Clans :/

EVILDEAD3601275d ago

LMAO...New Vegas was fun, but was NEVER on the level of Skyrim in ANYWAY.

Again loved the game, but Vegas wasnt even on Fallout 3 level.

Evil

SnakeCQC1275d ago

maybe because it was fallout 3 without the bugs

Ezz20131275d ago

true and that's because Obsidian Entertainment are the one who made it
and Bugthesda Softworks only publish it

that only show that betheseda can't program any thing right

Ashunderfire861275d ago

It had a lot of bugs too lol!!! you guys forgot. Heck Obsidian Entertainment made Knights of the Old Republic 2 buggy!!! And didn't patch it back in 2005.

vallencer1275d ago

It had more bugs than fallout 3. Unless we weren't playing the same new Vegas.

SnakeCQC1275d ago

fallout 3 felt like an unplayable £40 beta and new vegas was alot more playable(both were played on the ps3)

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1275d ago
Summons751275d ago (Edited 1275d ago )

Not made by obsidian is one key reason. The other is despite the bugs in Skyrim, Skyrim is at least playable unlike new Vegas which to this day me and a lot of people I know can not still even start the game because the tutorial area is so broken. Skyrim may have it's problems but at least Bethesda came out and said they screwed up and still work on fixing things while creating new content. Obsidian just blames the world for their problems and never blames themselves. They have always done this since the killed kotr by making kotr2. They blame beig rushed when in reality they are lazy and can't meet a deadline. Prime example of this was Alpha Protocol. Now everyone is feeding them money for a game they refuse to talk about which when it releases will be broken and all together terrible. Then they will say they were rushed and the kind people who fell for their con didn't give them enough money.

Edit: I read the title backwards but my comment is a disagreement to the article. Sorry for the error.

Irishguy951275d ago (Edited 1275d ago )

I had no problems playing Fallout New vegas. Fallout new vegas is the only Bethesda game I have liked for the last 5 years until Dishonored came out. Yes that's right...the ones Bethesda did not develop.

New vegas has many many idea's that bethesda should have copied for Skyrim but didn't.

New Vegas major ups -

No level scaling - ie Character progression
Some actual choices and cause and affect - ie RPG
No loot scaling - ie The loot is worth looking for.

For some silly reason bethesda did not put in the good companion model Fallout new vegas had into Skyrim. Every companion had a story, they were interesting and useful. I didn't get it anyway. Fallout New vegas even had a better animal system which Bethesda were hyping up for Skyrim. It's a bit rediculous.

Of course, some people like being able to explore everywhere, I like the fact that deathclaws exist and should avoid them in the beginning.

I also found the quests to be WAY better than Skyrim. Every quest of Skyrim, even the Major side quests was "Go to this dungeon, fight your way through, get the leveled loot at the end".

New vegas had entire area's dedicated and designed around a side quest(The hill at the start with the radio tower on it, the deathclaw valley, Cities, the camp in the mountain, the Brotherhood of steel etc). Bethesda simply didn't do that.

Edit--------------
Oh and the fact is Summons, they don't meet deadlines because the deadlines are too small.

Fallout 3 = 3-4 years dev time
New vegas = 1 and a half

Kotor 1 - 3 years dev time
Kotor 2 - 1 year.

It's rediculous how anyone could expect them to make long Rpg's in that amount of time. And even then Kotor 1 and New Vegas were still amazing.

Well, lets see how Southpark turns out. Since they aren't being held to an unreasonable deadline for it

"Traveling is a joy - not a chore."

To the writer of this article. Spot on. Exploring is simply more exciting in New Vegas. It's like when people complain about Dark souls having a penaly for death. The prospect of Danger makes the games more exciting. Skyrim has no dangers, even dragons just become an annoying repetition that follows you around chipping away at health until you button mash it to death

Mutant-Spud1275d ago

ROFL..Always with the "Rayciss" Stormcloaks, politically correct gaming bloggers always have to mention that,for the record Che Guevara despised Africans and homosexuals, he was also a torturer ,a child killer and a coward who died with a full clip in his gun, Ulfric is squeaky clean in comparison.
Then again since the popular stories of Ulfric Stormcloak and Che Guevara are both fiction I don't suppose it matters much.

Lordchunk1275d ago

Replace New Vegas with fallout 3 and you would of nailed this but oh well.

MonopolyRSV1275d ago

New Vegas plays smooth as butter compared to 3. New Vegas also has better music and a better overall environment. Much rather be roaming the open desert instead of lost in some underground subway with a compass constantly pointing in the wrong direction.

Show all comments...
The story is too old to be commented.