Submitted by Dailynch 845d ago | opinion piece

Assassin's Creed III: What Went Wrong

NowGamer: Ubisoft's ambitious adventure didn't quite work out as planned but what went wrong? (Assassin's Creed III, PC, PS3, Wii U, Xbox 360)

Optical_Matrix  +   845d ago
The pacing was just awful. That's my biggest complaint about the game. To me, it just felt like a chore to play through the story. The side content was excellent, but by the time I had chugged through the terrible story, I was burnt out, and didn't really feel like going back to it.
InTheLab  +   845d ago
I agree. The pacing is downright terrible. I've tried my best to make progress through AC3 to at least get to Conner but the game is so slow and boring, I can't make it past the Kenway missions before ejecting the game and popping in Dishonored or Farcry 3.

I'm not even the gunho CoD ADD type either. I just find the game incredibly boring with one button iWin combat, and awkward controls.

Another issue I have is with the stealth in this game. I'm tasked with reaching the docks with some other dude in tow and get spotted in a restricted area while leaning against a wall facing away from the guards...with 20 other people wandering about, yet they still spot me.

It's not even a problem because I can one button kill all of the guards and only lose 100% sync which is pointless anyway.

AC3 is awful and the series clearly peaked with AC2.

This is what happens when you milk a franchise to death.
lashes2ashes  +   845d ago
You can't blame this on milking. It had a three year development time, I think they tried to do way to much new things with this game and who ever play tested this needs to be fired some of the full sync requirements are almost completely impossible and the amount of bugs gives Skyrim a run for its money.
Nimblest-Assassin  +   845d ago
Main Mission Structure

I liked the story of AC3 a lot, however my problem was how the main missions where arranged. I mean AC2 and ACB by far have the best mission structure. AC3 has the best gameplay (freerunning and combat), but AC3 just pissed me off because it had so much potential to be amazing, and it feels like ubisoft sabotaged it everytime during the main mission.

I mean, the side content in AC3 is really good, the peg leg stuff was awesome, the naval missions and the fort liberations.

But the problem is really the main mission structure and the fact the game feels so bogged down by mundane tasks its frustrating. I mean, the game goes apeshit with collectables, but the only ones that actually benifit you or reward you are the peg leg ones. The underground is pointless, it would have been so much better if it was like the tombs in AC2 and ACB. Also, no puzzles which I loved in AC2 and ACB. I mean, how did they forget so much that made the series so good in AC3?

Also ACB did full sych properly, it was a means to challenge the player, but was never intrusive on you. Now its there for the sake of a trophy or achievement. Atleast reward people with the patience to full synch the entire game.

I have 99% of AC3 done, with a 95% trophy completion, but I don't feel like finishing because of the fact the game wants me to run around and fill up the frontier map. I mean seriously?

I mean, in AC2 you felt progression. Ezio was getting better and better and the main mission went on, and you felt rewarded by getting new assassination techniques, and the game was well paced and teaches you all the games mechanics. AC3 ignores all this and gives you everything from the start. I mean Connor is better at killing people than Ezio ever was. But I feel like I didn't earn it.

Also you never feel rewarded by playing the main missions like you did in AC2 and ACB.

I view AC3 like I do AC1, a lot of great ideas, but the execution needs work.

I hope ubisoft goes back to the drawing board, and improves the mission structure for AC4.

Hopefully AC4 doesn't come out next year. I just want them to take their time, and not rush out a game because of the "2012 story arc"

Its no secret I love the franchise, but the main mission structure really left a sour taste in my mouth
#1.2 (Edited 845d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
goldwyncq  +   845d ago
The ending.
Game0N  +   845d ago
I absolutely love this game, i don't know what everyone is griping on about.
MegaMohsi  +   845d ago
I liked Haytham Kenway more than Connor, which is a problem because you play as Haytham for only a few hours. He had way more personality and charm
R_A_LEE20  +   845d ago
This game left a bad taste in my mouth in terms of Assassins Creed games.

It had an interesting start but then it was followed by a boring story, boring characters, huge open areas land that were just uninteresting to explore, confusing political babel and historical figures who turned out to be complete dicks and an ending that just ended to quickly!

Worse game in the series if you ask me. Im glad i traded it in for Ubisofts far better and more satisfying game released a month after this garbage.
#5 (Edited 845d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
whiteyjuice  +   845d ago
7 million copies can't be wrong- scoreboard.
RFornillos4  +   845d ago
i have to agree. i was excited to know that AC3 was coming out, and got excited when all those teaser clips appeared. but once i got into it. i felt a little betrayed; mind you i'm just at around 45% of the game. i intend to complete it, but you gotta admit, but i feel like everything's just drags on.

there's no sense of progression when playing a Connor. at least Ezio slowly progressed from a lowly inexperienced assassin to a master assassin. but Connor, is just so, well good. veteran players won't have a hard time with him, heck even first-timers who get the hang of the controls will be easily killing a group of soldiers early on. with AC2, it wasn't so, coz you start on with some bare weapons and your life meter is also small. and upgrading them and your armor clearly motivates you to improve your skills as a gamer also.

naval missions are okay though. some other side missions or tasks are okay, but sometimes provide little motivation to complete. and i'm just being honest here, still can't get the hang of the crafting part, coz i'm not sure how to get some of the required items. maybe i just missed some parts or dialogue, but again the tasks tend to be a chore.

i also noticed there's just too many short cinematics. i know i can skip most of them, but do you really need to see the small clip when you activate the "Skin" animal button every time? Connor's pretty much saying the same thing over and over.

again, i intend to finish the game, but with little motivation to do so, it can take awhile before i'll actually get to that. i just hope AC4 will be better than this.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
New stories

1980s-themed Film “Pixels” Mobile Game to Remind Us of Simpler Times

12m ago - Bidnessetc: This was a time where gaming was simple. We had no micro-transactions, digital downlo... | Mobile

Postal 2 DLC Blasts Double Fine, Portrays Tim Schafer as Sexual Deviant

12m ago - The amount of Tim Schafer and Double Fine Productions hatred packed in simply must be seen to be... | PC

Start Making Games for the PS4

Now - Want to design the next generation of video games? Start learning game design today. Click for more info on how to get started. | Promoted post

GTA V PC Review (TruePCGaming)

12m ago - John Williamson from TPG writes: "The PC version is superbly optimized, visually stunning and... | PC

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt - Preview (PC) | Shibdib Gaming & Tech News

12m ago - With the next game in The Witcher series going gold Shibdib Gaming thought it would re-cap the ex... | PC

Solve puzzles and bend nature in Winterflame: The Other Side

13m ago - Winterflame: The Other Side is a side scrolling adventure game that feature Lev, a human boy with... | PC