Submitted by PureSophistry 1017d ago | opinion piece

Educated Gamer: Why Moral Choices Are a Myth


"It’s become a recent trend in games to inject some half baked ideas of morality or a moral consciousness into their games, mainly as a way to increase longevity; basically it’s just a cheeky way to get you to play the game twice to see the sickly sweet ‘good’ ending. The reality is there are no such things as moral choices in games because the game can be played again or reloaded to perform a ‘do over’. Sadly morality in games is often as messy in virtual worlds as it is the real, often I praised Mass Effect for having the bad speech options highlighted red and the good blue so I knew how to be evil, or good if I was feeling frivolous." (BioShock, Culture, Industry, Mass Effect, PS3, Xbox 360)

Attached Video
shivvy24  +   1018d ago
interesting article
WolfLeBlack  +   1017d ago
A good idea for an article there, but the author didn't actually seem to reach any real point past: how can morality in games work? More time and words needed to be dedicated to this article, I feel.

For me, morality in games is a tricky thing. Most games throw in moral choices, but then very clearly sign-post "Good" and "Bad" choices, and then reward you for heavily for being good. I don't think that's all together bad, after all it works quite well for Mass Effect, although happily it never felt like it punished me for being bad.

The Witcher 2 did moral choices very well, I though. It presented a situation, and solutions to that situation, but never sat there and said, "that one is bad and that one is good". You just had choices, and it was up you to read the situation and choose what you deemed appropiate. There was no clear cut "good" and "bad", just choices.
spartanlemur  +   1017d ago
"one man's freedom fighter is another man's terrorist"

Untrue - a freedom fighter attacks the perpetrators who are making a conscious and unfair decision to oppress them whereas terrorists attack both decision-maker and their people/civilians. Terrorism attacks innocents to prove a point, freedom fighting attacks only those who bear arms and prevent them directly from enjoying freedom (or those up the chain of command responsible.

Upholding sustainable utilitarianism and fairness of its application is a largely benevolent objective, and choices which work towards this are objective, and not subjective morality.
There are indeed good and bad choices, but I'll agree that this isn't the case all the time (economics - austerity is not evil, just an alternative way to upping spending to escape a recession and debt.).
What we need is more dragon age style choices, where your companions perceive you a certain way, rather than fable style extremes of good and evil.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
New stories

The Gamer Headlines Show Episode 51: Shenmue III Slacker Backer and 30 Years of Back to the Future

21m ago - Hosted by Adnan Riaz and Christopher Cortes This week’s episode has our hosts discussing their... | PC

Star Wars Battlefront Beta | Steampunks

21m ago - Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for Nick and Chris when they have good blasters... | PC

MoreConsole takes on Destiny: The Taken King

Now - MoreConsole's rag-tag band of guardians finally make it to the Oryx's ship...but can they make it out alive? | Promoted post

Naughty Dog: Uncharted 4’s ‘Intimate Moments Just as Important as Big Spectacles’

26m ago - Chris Mawson writes: "Naughty Dog’s Uncharted 4: A Thief’s End has largely been showcased so far... | PS4

What if the Sims Were Done in the Style of Pokemon?

45m ago - Carl Williams writes, "Interesting thought, what if the Sims were done in the style of Pokemon?... | Retro

Let's Talk About How Sony Bungled the Vita

45m ago - The PS Vita had a ton of potential upon its release and moving forward when the PlayStation 4 cam... | PS Vita