Now, before European Star Trek fans jump up and down with unbridled joy upon seeing Bethesda's name attached to Conquest, it's perhaps worth bearing in mind that while Oblivion is a truly standout title, Bethesda has also produced a stream of promising Star Trek titles that all failed to deliver.
Moreover, Star Trek: Legacy, Star Trek: Encounters, Star Trek: Tactical Assault, and Star Trek: Conquest (US) have all found themselves struggling to surpass a Metacritic review average of 64/100... Not a sure sign of critical acclaim.
After telling us what popular games he though sucked, Chris turns to the opposite end of the spectrum. Which generally derided games does he think aren't all that bad.
NintendoLife writes: "Back in the olden days (the nineties) there were a plethora of game choices for Star Trek fans. Most notable for fans of strategy games were Birth of the Federation and Star Trek: Armada. These games were essentially clones of earlier, better games. But they were redesigned with a Star Trek theme and cast of characters. Star Trek: Conquest is the embarrassingly dim-witted child of these two classic strategy games."
NoBSGamers writes: "You may remember the posting, Four Budget Games Worth Playing,all of the games on that listing were for the older systems (PS2, Game Cube, Xbox). Today we are going to look for the best of the budget games for the next generation systems*."
I found Assassin's Creed to be fun but at the same time repetitive.
It's definitely worth a rental but nothing more.
Dark Sector is fun but I'm still suck on a level and I don't know what to do. >:(
Dark Kingdom is ok not the best PS3 Exclusive in the world but still good.
Prey is so awesome. It's such an underrated game. (3D Realms rocks!)
Guitar Hero: Aerosmith (Not the best in the franchise and besides I don't like the band Aerosmith.
Tomb Raider = Gay! (Uncharted is so much better now then Tomb Raider. Seriously.)
Star Trek Conquest (I'm not sure but I'll give it a try.)
