Somewhat of a holiday gift from head honcho and centerpiece for internet trolling Gabe Newell, the Steam Box has indeed been announced and has a release date set for roughly Q1 2013. Despite no real solid details being given regarding set-in-stone plans or structural context of the project, the future looks extremely bright.
It just depends on what it can do at the end of the day and if they want to lure people in they better start revealing it soon since it would be coming out this Summer.
I mean it's really for console gamers who would want to play on there PC with games but can't because of how much gaming PCs cost and I mean good PCs the ones which will last you for a few years without upgrading.
If the Steam box has great storage for downloable games and has a place to store mods then it's a buy from me. Playing L4D like you would on the 360, controler and all, BUT with mods...it would be amazing. Hell imagine TF2...the FULL game like on the PC, all the updates and new features for it, lets not forget all the FREE DLC for games. I could finaly play Skyrim but with all the great mods out there.
I personaly believe this is a proper console, they're trying to say it's some PC/Hybrid but I think there just saying that incase some PC gamers thinking they are "abandoning" that audience when there not...they are just trying to expand and widen there audience. I mean it is there first console...anything after could be easily improved or added with a Steam update
Too many consoles will probably force one of the players out of the game early, and I believe that casualty will be the Steam Box.
This is probably not going to matter since the Steam box is being aimed at PC gamers, but still.
@BattleAxe:
While already having a 40 million user base is a very good point, still have to ask how many those -
Wait: Half-Life 2 Episode 3. Sh*t, that's probably 10 million sales first month if not day one which then gives them tons of credit with 3rd party devs. Again - sh*t.
Question is will there be any backlash if its a Steam box exclusive? Not on PC.
Now if you look at the games that Valve has which they can make exclusive to Steam...Portal, Left 4 Dead, Counter Strike, Team Fortress and Half Life. While I'm not a fan of a couple of these games, these are huge titles that will entice people to buy the Steam Box. The last point I'll make, is that when console gamers see the huge sales that Steam offers as compared to the price of console games, gamers will see a huge opportunity just like I did, to save alot of money.
The business case for Steam to move into the livingroom is simple, just look at how many copies of a game like CoD sells on consoles as compared to PC....its obvious. If Steam moves into the livingroom, it becomes more maistream than it already is. Because of the Steam User Interface, it makes PC gaming user friendly. I used to be a hardcore Sonydroid (and I still am :), but Steam has opened my eyes to PC gaming to the point where 50% of my time is spent on my PC these days. Steam is essentially already a console on your PC, so in my opinion the move to a dedicated console for the livingroom is a natural evolution for the Steam service.
"Can you plz keep your post short and simple. Like a paragraph or less should honestly be the maximum. You need to learn how to get your point across with only a few sentences because if you go on. Your post becomes boring and confusing. Most of the time, I honestly don't read your post because it so long and because it so much. Im srry for the mini rant but I just had to get that off my chest. You have really been annoying me lately. "
So basically what you're saying is keep it short and simple?
What other PC perks will it allow? E.g. Can I watch anything on it and download any game, film and music on it?
Will you be able to install Office or other essentials on there?
In other words, will the price of the Steambox justify the purchase over a dedicated entertainment pc that can do everything.
1. Potentially cheaper software
2. Better platform for indie developers
3. Faster updates and patch approvals
4. Primarily just a game machine (Netflix, cable/movie provider, etc. will not be offered) Some may see this as a negative.
5. Free online service that also supports dedicated servers and mod support
6. The ability to gift and trade online content
7. More powerful hardware than current consoles
This is what it has (potentially) going against it
1. Digital content only
2. Lack of AAA exclusives
3. Marketing and retail outlets
4. High price
5. Not as upgradeable as a PC
What is clear is out of all the other players Valve is the best for partnering itself with actual gamers. They don't have other hardware or other divisions to cater to. They are not overwhelmed with management. They are the less restrictive.
I'd rather read one of Jinkies' well thought out posts than one of your trolling, fanboyish posts.
It annoys me that you haven't been banned yet!
that hasnt been said before? Valve and Steam are well known in the PC gaming segment (as stated before).
The Pc gaming segment is a small percentage of total PC users in the world and it even pales in comparison to that of the home console market.
Ask a 40-60 year old person if they know who Valve is (let alone Steam) and see if they are as aware as asking them if they know who Mario is.
no doubt the steambox is the coming of age of ideas that have been tried before. only now, here we are at the right time and with a company that gamers can relate to. Unlike other attempts at bridging the PC gaming world with the console gaming world.
MS could be considered the runaway success in that before the xbox, most only related MS with windows and their office products. The gaming portion was very small by comparison. Them bringing the idea of a PC in a box to the living room...tried before but not as an actual entertainment platform (think webtv).
others had ideas of trying to do the PC convenience in traditional home electronics. Via and Apex had a unit that was to offer drop in play of PC games (at the time) but of course the names backing the project werent as widely known so the initial backing of others wasnt as strong.
We all know about the Phantom which was the elusive streaming platform that never was but the idea of stream-play went on to be used in services like Gaikai and on-live and a few others.
All good ideas eventually find their way back around. Its a matter time and place that determines success.
I wouldn't call the steambox a "mistake", but i would question the market it is going for.
PC's exist to do one thing and consoles exist to do another.
I can't see the PC crowd being too interested, as they will probably have a PC anyway if they are fond of Valve.
But on the flipside, i can't imagine the majority of console players jumping ship over their more familiar brands of Playstation and Xbox as they initially picked console over Pc initially for a reason.
I have always seen PC and console as seperate entities, so the purpose of the SteamBox is lost on me as someone who currently owns a PC and have the consoles too.
All the best of luck and i hope it succeeds and pushes the next console gen to new heights, but it's not filling a market gap i personally see as necessary.
Consoles have the upper hand to PC Gaming by being so easy to buy and use. All Valve is doing is making an incredibly accessible PC that runs Big Picture mode. They aren't trying to compete with Xbox and PlayStation, they're just trying to allow gamers to get into PC gaming easier.
By that I mean you won't see Valve making all their first party games (Half Life, Portal, Left 4 Dead, etc) exclusive to Steam. They'll still pop up on Xbox and PlayStation (possibly WiiU) regardless of SteamBox being released.
I'm on the same boat as your brother, I want to get into PC gaming but I don't want to go thru building or paying for a high end PC so for me this is a day one for me, but I disagree on not making their games exclusives and being on the other consoles.
Half Life Ep 3 or new Half Life game
Left for Dead 3
Portal 3
TF3
New Counter Strike Game
Dota 3
Day of Defeat 2
Alien Swarm 2
Orange Box 2
Imagine not being able to play Half Life on your PS4 or 720.
I will be buying a Steam Box day one and I am a hardcore console gamer.
counter strike is pure trash
the only game thats ok is portal
Are you serious? both games were ground breaking when released.
access to PC gaming.
Having a company like this( http://www.computerandvideo... ) make a console is a breath of fresh air.
"Valve has revealed that it has no interest in cashing in on its unique position by going public - because it couldn't handle the interference from shareholders."
why would anyone get a 720 over steam box? this?
http://www.cinemablend.com/...
http://www.ign.com/articles...
http://www.nowgamer.com/new...
plus it will cost $60 more than steam box or ps4 if at the same price.
Unless you only want to play off line in 2013.
http://themash.com/wp-conte...
You do know FPS games were born on PC's and they control best on KB and mouse right?. Give me a mid-high end PC any day over a console for FPS games.
Consoles are ok for adventure/party games though.
Also Valve make much better games than other console games like Halo and COD and the same old crap, Half Life owns both.
I hope im wrong because i think that the console market will benefit hugely from another solid contender. Hopefully the Steam Box will force Sony and Microsoft to up their game this time around which can only be a good thing, right?
Have to disagree man, if Valve's console launches with Half-Life 3, Left 4 Dead 3, Team Fortress 3 or Portal 3 I'll have to demand that Valve shut the hell up and take my money!
agreed, Valve has no chance
It also gives developers aiming at Steam a good benchmark for reasonable performance if they want. As the next console generation deepens, I'll wager that higher spec valve systems will be available - eventfully trouncing consoles on price/performance and being far more developer friendly. It'll also have way more exclusives (having the advantages of PC and console with no technical downsides). Might even be able to stick a new graphics card in (which in like 1 year will far outperform consoles for $150). If it also acts as an ordinary Linux machine, that could bring more to the table too.
I can't see it stealing much market share from other platforms. However, it doesn't need to. They announced other vendors will make the machines, so there's no big risk with special manufacturing or anything - most/all of the components will be standard, could even be built on order etc. Oh, and mods.
Are you saying Valve didn't call you guys for business advice?
Their loss, I guess.
Millions of people know Valve and Steam...all it takes is to advertise to them through the internet, and advertise a bit on television.
We might even see more higher quality games get released exclusively on PC if the thing sells well enough.
1. yes 1 NUMBER 1 on the market. giving devs alot more time to spend with it.
2. VALVE/STEAM box... a console VERY close if not CLOSEST to PC. These devs make these games on PC's. Not to mention the xbox/ps3 war about how the 360 has architecture similar to PC's. sorry to say, although I like my PS3 better, I can see the differences in certain games. Framerate/AA and shit like that.
3. Who knows PC's better than Valve/Steam? They MAKE these games for PC's. Through those years Im sure they got a pretty good idea as to what they wanted in a machine as for performance. Not to mention they could make their own launch titles. Left 4 Dead 3 anyone??
4. My personal favorite, and the reason I was about to buy a PC....MODS. Could you imagine enless L4D mods or even Call of Duty mods? Im a fan of COD zombies! But the endless PC mods are just insane and I would love to see them on a console. I bet if any, valve would do that.
My point is that all of this makes me want to buy this system. Not to mention they already have a handle in the console industry so I bet that once it DOES hit, it's going to be one hell of a system that I won't regret buying
This hasn't necessarily happened before....a competitor of Valves' nature.
People said the same bloody thing about Xbox 1 when it was just Sega, Nintendo and Sony, and then Nintendo and Sony....Xbox comes in am sure people are like OOHH NO, DOUBT IT'LL GO FARRR, Major mistake Microsoft! GO HOME YOU'RE DRUNK!
Now look at it....
Give or take, Valve makes good fucking decisions when it launches, it can probably mimic that success if they keep away from the mistakes Microsoft had done in their time.
It's a 50/50 chance to me of it could just come and go like Betamax as a format or it could be like Blu-ray as a format and slowly tread in and become a New norm. Anyone who seriously jumps the gun though and just says NOPE ITS GONNA SUCK....With zero evidence like you did Batman? I honestly find your kind opinionated jackasses, it's your opinion yes, but, under what bloody evidence or experience globally can you say your opinion is warranted with logic or common sense? None! It can't be determined until we see literally how they choose to advertise and make it and market it.
Could have been said for PS1 before it launched.
Could have been said about Xbox 1 and xbox 360 before they launched.
You dont see potential in Steambox which is fine. But that is the reason why you are not the one leading a multi billion dollar company. You dont have vision and you think that the status quo will be the same forever.
Do you think people thought PS1 would get so big? or the xbox brand, which has cannibalized half the marketshare from Sony?
Talk to the people in the past and they will be saying the same thing you are saying here. "I dont see that working".
Depending how valve plays this, this thing has the potential to slaughter other consoles. Doesnt matter if you realize it or not.
This will hurt SONY more than anyone. M$ with XBOX Live is established & well connected: Kinect, SmartGlass, and the core games Halo, Gears, Fable, Forza & others is something to be reckoned with.
SONY doesnt have the online community M$ & Valve have and both of them are well established. SONY also failed with motion controls. The only reason they have motion sales is because they packed it into the console box. For proof, see game sales using SONY motion that isn't packed in...
Nintendo will have the 4 to 10year old market and nothing else with this Wii U, I think their hardcore is going to drop them soon.
Steambox has potential to punch all three big console competitors in the gut and take their market share. Some more than others, but I don't expect Sony to take as big of a hit as Microsoft. Valve could hold HL3 away from other consoles and even the PC platform for a timed period to see it on its own platform first.
Steambox could turn the tide in console over PC development as well. If developers see it as easiest to build a game on then it will become the base platform for ports to other consoles and even the PC. Less PC port problems maybe?
HTCPs have been around for well over 20+ years.
Steam console = HTCP.
That is a drop in the bucket whereas revenue is concerned. 3 million to start making a dent towards profit. I don't think they can compete with the Next XBOX or PS.
There are more than enough consoles out there now.
I can't wait for Source 2 and HL3, L4D3 to come, hopefully this means it will come next year to PC.
I don't think it's really going to compete with Sony/MS's platforms. But it doesn't really need to in order to survive as a product.
I just got done playing Crysis 2 on PC and the Wii U wont be able to produce visuals on that type of level. Though it will likely make up for the lack of visuals with good Nintendo exclusives. I wont be surprised if the PS4 and 720 come close to mid to high level PC specs.
Nintendo doesn't have 3rd party support to the level of Microsoft and Sony. Their (Nintendo) 1st/2nd party software content is usually enough of a reason for consumers to buy their (Nintendo) hardware.
If the ''Steambox'' is as powerful as the 720/PS4, consumers might buy into what Valve might be advertizing, and they also have the exclusives gamers want to play.
Nintendo isn't exempt from the competition - it's just that they choose to stay clear of the technical gaming warfare, and focus more on the entertainment aspect.
Yes because its not like Halo 5 or Uncharted 4 won't be more of the same is it? >_>
Sequels are always "more of the same".
Honestly can people go one day without throwing bias at Nintendo?
OT: I think this will do well among the Valve lovers. It has a lot of potential.
Yes, except Uncharted and Halo still haven't lost their charm unlike Mario version 56 which is the same game yet again.
Right out the box, they dont have EA supporting this ( EA= Origin)
Then, cost. Msft and Sony are both running AMD components next gen. Msft may run 1-2APUs and a GPU. Sony 1-2 APUs and a GPU also, their both aiming at 400-500dollars launch price.
If Newell went and built a living room PC, his Intel options are pricey.. up to $300 for a CPU alone?
Also, he could go with AMD.. though we all know they arent the greatest for gaming. Msft and Sony can get the most out of AMD chips due to console optimisation, but if Gabe wants to put steam in this box, play steam games,I just dont see the point of it.
Im not even sure who their aiming this at. I mean, I am not a pc gamer, but I have a mid range gaming pc. Why would I buy this if I could just play it on pc and have the freedom to upgrade my pc?
2. Gabe isn't stupid. After Steam's success, Valve has more than earned the benefit of the doubt.
I have no earthly idea what they plan with the "Steam-box", but Valve has shown its pretty good at building something that people think will fail.
Intel has raised the bar. Hopefully AMD can catch up to them one day. I see lackluster K10 as the problem. Everything they have at the moment is built around updated variables of K10 without a real successor to it anywhere just yet.
Intel options are not always expensive.
highly doubtful.
I think it'll only have about... 10 games though. Maybe less (haven't logged into Steam on Linux in a few days).
You can use a PS3 or 360 controller if you want... mods... not a bad console really, but it'd suck as an only/main gaming device.
Don't take the lame media bait, folks.
How did Sony first get started out? Back when other big boys like Nintendo ruled the industry? How did microsoft get started out? Same way steambox is coming to a store near you.
You make a better product, offer a better service, dont charge too much and people notice.
Not everyone is a fanboy like 100% of you people on N4G worshipping your gaming machines. When average joe shmo finds out he doesnt need to pay xbox live fees, and doesnt need to pay $60 for new video games, doesnt need to wait in line for midnight purchases, He will be buying the steambox.
Oh right there isnt one. Hence the point i was making in my original post.
I suspect they are targeting those who want to play PC games and don't want to buy a PC (or see getting a PC as a complicated hurdle that's not worth it). It could be a lot of gamers or a little.
I can't see it being released Q1. Though, Valve runs a VERY tight ship, this could have been in the works for years.
If they launch it as a Apple-Valve venture.. you know the sheep are going to eat it up. Even if they make it $1000. If it has an Apple logo, Apple sheep always think its worth buying. Their awefully delusional and mostly fake.
Try and keep up.
I see SteamBox as a Gateway to the world of PC Gaming!!
I really don't see Steam trying to compete with Xbox720 or PS4.....Seriously Steam has a Gazillion games that the Consoles don't have and PC Gaming is something completely DIFFERENT than console gaming.
You can have your console and SteamBox too but i just see the SteamBox being that tool that just allows those who want to get into PC Gaming as a simple way to do it!! Also Low end or Mid Range PC Gamers may wanna upgrade to a SteamBox if it will let them play their games at a higher setting than their old PC.
Also No Valve game will be Exclusive to SteamBox cause that would cause a FRIGGIN riot from those of us with Gaming PC's with no need to buy a SteamBox!
SteamBox seems good and is just a way to get STEAM more customers, allows Valve to not have to deal with Microsoft, and allows consolers an easy transition to PC Gaming.
I HATE PC gaming. The last game I tried to play was Gears of War for Windows, and it is the ugliest mess of a setup I have ever seen. You have to update drivers, download the RIGHT patch, and still, the menu is glitchy. Granted, that is more People Can Fly and Microsofts fault.
If I can use Steam on a affordable console on my big TV, I'd be very happy. I think all of us console gamers would like to play some games from Steam, but just can't be rooted installing, patching etc. So if they eliminate that BS from all of it, and it is as simple as a home console, then count me in.
GFWL is horrible, I hate having to install games that use it.
"All of that is stuff that we're working on, but it's a long way from Valve shipping any sort of hardware."
To it being released in Q1 2013?
The big problem with the PC gaming industry has always been digregation. It has way too many configurations, cards, cpus, etc, so it's a customer support hell. Steambox will help unify this so that developers have a single platform to target at and will make it easier to develop, together with non-existant barrier of entry like other platform royalties to develop for their console, maybe this could be the real comeback of PC gaming.
Why this is good? Because consoles fixed hardware slows down to a crawl gaming advances. They are ahead of the market techonologically for one or two years, but after that they slowing get behind on hardware, and games become limited dor this reason. With an upgradeable steambox, you could get the best hardware on a fixed platform that will allow developers to focus specifically what they can do.
With what PS4/720 will come with, both consoles are very good with a big following, networks are good.
As for hl3.
As decent has halflife games were, they have been overtaken in most respects. the only thing left is the story & characters.
Valves engine needs a complete overhaul anyway.
You realize that the first HL pioneered the modern FPS right?
Not sure why you think that Valve can't make a modern FPS.
LOL.... decent ???
Half-Life series are among the best games ever made.