390°
Submitted by Tolkoto 489d ago | interview

Crytek’s chief: Nothing will beat Crysis 3′s graphics for at least two years (interview)

Let the graphics wars begin. Cevat Yerli, chief executive of Crytek, argues that his company’s upcoming game, Crysis 3 (to be published Feb. 19 by Electronic Arts) will “set the benchmark” in 3D graphics for games for the next two years. He believes the PC is racing ahead of the consoles now in terms of the beauty of its graphics. (Crysis 3, PC)

« 1 2 »
majiebeast  +   489d ago
Something tells me this is gonna bite him in the ass later. Think he is underestimating Metro last light among other games.
#1 (Edited 489d ago ) | Agree(88) | Disagree(8) | Report | Reply
FriedGoat  +   489d ago
yup, total BULL.
MikeMyers  +   489d ago
True. Besides, wouldn't you rather be known for making some of the best games, not the best graphics?
R6ex  +   489d ago
Crysis was known for best graphics, not best gameplay. That's what brought Crytek fame. I really hope Crysis 3 will look so amazing that it will encourage gamers to upgrade their GPUs.
Pandamobile  +   489d ago
@R6ex under all the shiny graphics, Crysis 1 is still an amazing shooter.
da_2pacalypse  +   489d ago
lol yeah... This guy can somehow see the future?
Irishguy95  +   488d ago
Crysis are like Killzone games, great/focus on graphics, with good gameplay.

Except killzone is limited by the Ps3
#1.1.5 (Edited 488d ago ) | Agree(12) | Disagree(25) | Report
Ritsujun  +   488d ago
and Irishguy95's limited by lack of exclusives
Zhipp  +   488d ago
@Ritsujun
You're aware that the PC has more exclusives than all current-gen consoles combined, right?
starchild  +   488d ago
I'd say he is probably right. I have seen nothing on the horizon that even comes close to competing with Crysis 3.

Now, if Sony or Microsoft really push out some amazing graphics in some of the games they launch their next consoles with then Crysis 3 may only hold the graphics crown for a year or so. But that remains to be seen.

Crysis 3 does look absolutely amazing.
Twignberries  +   489d ago
Lets hope Metro last light is actually optimized to run smooth on rigs other than NASA supercomputers this time around though.
Farsendor1  +   489d ago
my 2 6970s plays that game fine
AKS  +   489d ago
@Farsendor1

Very High, DOF, 16x AF, high resolution?

Metro at max is probably the most demanding game I have.
#1.2.2 (Edited 489d ago ) | Agree(12) | Disagree(1) | Report
Twignberries  +   489d ago
@Farsendor1 sorry to be blunt mate either I'm calling bullsh*t on your comment or you're not truly maxing it out. I've got 2x gtx680 with 32 gb ram and I can't run it properly maxed. Mind you that's at 2560x1440
AKS  +   489d ago
I just tested Metro with every setting at max at 1080p. I have an OCed 2600K and two GTX 670 4 GB cards in SLI. I could get 60 fps much of the time in enclosed areas, such as in towns, but the frame rate still dropped noticeably in effects heavy or busy segments. I'd be really curious to know how two 6970s are supposedly outperforming my PC. Did you mean two 6990s?

I can certainly get a playable frame rate at max (@ 1080p, that is), but that's not a high resolution by PC gaming standards, and it's ridiculous that I need this much power for a game that largely takes place in corridors. Metro is certainly not a well optimized game. I'd hate to think what you'd need to get a stable 60 fps at a very high resolution at max. Metro is a great looking game, but it demands about 3 or 4 times more power than it should for what you get.
josephayal  +   489d ago
Metro and killzone 3
JANF  +   488d ago
...
#1.3.1 (Edited 488d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(4) | Report
JANF  +   488d ago
Did you say Killzone 3... huh? The game looks good but not in the same league of Crisis or Metro on PC.
tachy0n  +   489d ago
he was refering to the PC not consoles.
SilentNegotiator  +   489d ago
He said the same garbage about Crysis 2 and they didn't get bit at all. They created a disappointing sequel and still sold just fine.
Eyeco  +   488d ago
I actually got down to playing Crysis 1 on my friends PC, it was a good game nothing amazing imo I found it to be an EXTREMELEY overrated game, maybe because for the past 4 years its the only game that i've heard PC elitists brag about. Then again I don't blame them because the game single handedly undermined the hyped up "power" of the 360 and PS3.

The impression I got on the internet was essentially the greatest game ever, Yes the graphics are incredible the best i've ever seen in a game but aside from that I found the gameplay to be quite bland.
For example the weapons felt underwhelming or indistinguishable , the suit was laughably overhyped the only power up that was ever useful and actually had a general impact on the gameplay was the invisibility, engaging the enemy was a chore rather than a rewarding or fun experience , further exemplified by the Aliens which were an absolute chore to engage.

Really the game just felt like I was walking from point A-B rather than engaging in compelling level design, this became more apparent when I used the invisibility, the experience at that point pretty much boiled down to the equivalent of walking through a corridor of pretty paintings. IMHO Crysis is one of the most overrated games of all time.
#1.5.1 (Edited 488d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report
UnholyLight  +   489d ago
Well, they were right for a while about Crysis 2, at least on Xbox 360 for a good while. I hadn't played a game that was as graphically powerful as Crysis 2 till I don't even know what.. Battlefield 3, Skyrim, and Forza 4 were the games that wowed me after Crysis 2 did.
Hufandpuf  +   488d ago
Skyrim just uses a bunch of filter effects to make the game look smooth and well lit, but in reality, it a jaggy, los-res mess on consoles.
Reverent  +   488d ago
Honestly, I don't think Skyrim is a graphical masterpiece at all, whether on consoles or PC (unless you use mods of course). I appreciate the game as an open world RPG, it really doesn't need to wow anyone with graphics. Battlefield, while beautiful, again doesn't need to impress people with its graphics because it's flat out just a really fun game. I played Crysis 2 on both PS3 and Xbox for a short time, enough to play through at least half the campaign and a few hours of multiplayer, and honestly, I felt like I was playing Call of Duty in yet another boring incarnation of New York City.
Parallax_Films  +   489d ago
Metro Last Light, battlefield 4, Last of Us.

Now I'm all for pushing technology as much as possible, but c'mon Cevat, a little humbleness never hurt anyone.

The Last of Us looks incredible and on just PS3! You don't hear Naughty Dog bragging about it every chance they get and look at the praise, awards and nominations they've already achieved!
WetN00dle69  +   488d ago
yeah The Last of Us looks great BUT there is no WAY in hell that it can go up against Crysis 3 NO WAY IN HELL!
Reverent  +   488d ago
@Wet, also consider that The Last of Us is a PS3 (You know, a console) exclusive. Don't get me wrong, I love the PS3, but just imagine if ND wasn't limited by it's hardware. The things they will accomplish on the PS4 will be legendary, if it isn't already.
Parallax_Films  +   488d ago
@WET, It doesn't have to go up against Crysis 3 maxed out on a PC because either way, and I'm pretty sure it's hardly very subjective The Last of Us looks technically incredible.
Welshy  +   489d ago
I wonderful if it will have wonderfully rendered paper-flat shell casings like Crysis 2 again!

If they just shut up, released their game and let people see how good it is for themselves, they wouldn't have to go like this then get burned when Metro Last Light kicks it's ass.

I personally felt even Metro 2033 outshone Crysis 2 when both were maxed out.

Crytek: the masters of regrettable BS statements.
AKS  +   489d ago
"I personally felt even Metro 2033 outshone Crysis 2 when both were maxed out."

I'm not so sure about that. Crysis 2 looked pretty damn good at max with the DX11 and high res patches.

http://cloud-2.steampowered...
Braid  +   489d ago
I'm sorry but that's not true. Try Crysis 2 with the latest official DX11 patch and HD textures, plus install quality mod 1.9 and Maldo HD 3.0 textures, then you'll have one of the most amazing looking games up to now, if not the best.
iNcRiMiNaTi  +   488d ago
I agree, without mods Metro 2033 outshines Crysis 2 DX11 even with their high res patch. The particle effects and lighting were insane in metro on ultra and physx turned on running dx11, smoke from the weapons fired, shell casings on the the ground, weapon decals, ragdolls, and the details on the characters. You could literally slice away at someone's face until you start seeing the bones and flesh.

Here are a couple of screens I took when I played
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/210...
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/210...
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/210...
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/210...
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/210...
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/210...
http://i.imgur.com/h6eqH.jp...
http://i.imgur.com/PCL7h.jp...
http://i.imgur.com/X4hEZ.jp...
http://i.imgur.com/5LrXc.jp...
akaakaaka  +   489d ago
So the next gen games from. Guerrilla games /naughty dogs/santa Monica/ kojima are coming around after feb/march 2015
That is a long wait ;/

Or the is been a prick and he meant that crysis 4 will come two years after crysis 3?
RuperttheBear  +   489d ago
'Crysis 3 on PC is going to be a benchmark experience for at least two years.'

On pc. PC. Sorry did you read the interview?

No, of course you didn't. You just looked at the headline and decided to churn out the old Guerrilla games /naughty dogs/santa Monica line that ps3 fanbois always churn out.
chukamachine  +   488d ago
Last light looks nothing special, and no it's nowhere close to the CRYSIS3 engine. Nothing is.

Metro 2033 was a corridor shooter, and was boring.

I don't doubt the new game will be the same.

Metro is demanding because it's poorly coded. optimization never happened.

http://www.gamersyde.com/st...
#1.10 (Edited 488d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(7) | Report | Reply
ChronoJoe  +   488d ago
Metro last light doesn't have to deal with things like foliage rendering though so as an engine / what the game is trying to achieve it isn't even in the same ballpark as what they're doing with Cryengine 3, in Crysis 3.

A lot of what makes metro look pretty is lighting and filters.

Also Crytek are selling their engine as much as their games, so of course they're going to boast about it's graphical fidelity over anything else.

Personally I found all of their games to be very enjoyable too. Far Cry was great, then Crysis was pretty good also, Warhead had decent MP, Crysis 2 was hit and miss for many but I really enjoyed it - Crysis 3 looks to take the best of Crysis 1 and 2, I'm sure it'll be a good game.
Abriael  +   488d ago
Something tells me that Star Citizen is going to make him eat his words with a side dish of bile.
#1.12 (Edited 488d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
Oh_Yeah  +   488d ago
The Crysis series is indeed some great fps games regardless of graphics, the people that hate on it and say oh it sucks it just gets hype because it looks good. I really doubt you gave it a chance...the game play is fun, it's more free rome-ish/ the way you chose to play the game varies more so than halo, cod, or battlefield.
Knight_Crawler  +   488d ago
@Majie - you canot compare last light which is a brown grey shooter compared to a game that has more colors than just Brown, Black, green and grey.

Related image(s)
#1.14 (Edited 488d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
FlyingFoxy  +   488d ago
Crytek in my opinion have the wrong idea here, they release games that run at poor framerates for at least 2 years until hardware catches up, Crysis and Oblivion as well as some others are a good example of this. They struggled to maintain 30-40FPS on even the best graphics cards on release which is pathetic.

Games are meant to be played on release at 60+FPS, they focus too much on graphics, with (imo) not very good gameplay.

Give me a Valve game any day that performs really great at 1920x1080 and a steady high framerate over a game that isn't as good and just better to look at.
#1.15 (Edited 488d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
wita  +   489d ago
Yeah, pretty bold claim.
Hellsvacancy  +   488d ago
Its like the 3rd or 4th bold statement theyve made this week
Jinkies  +   489d ago
Last of Us says high...

Off Topic: How the hell did I loose two bubbles in 4 days when I've never been bubbled down once. Seriously this sites a joke sometimes, I better get them back
#3 (Edited 489d ago ) | Agree(13) | Disagree(50) | Report | Reply
Pandamobile  +   489d ago
You're kidding yourself if you think The Last of Us is in the same league as the PC version of Crysis 3.
Ezz2013  +   489d ago
i think he's not talking about crysis 3 pc
because if that what he mean then there is something really wrong with him

i think he's talking about consoles
if that's the case then he's right
#3.1.1 (Edited 489d ago ) | Agree(19) | Disagree(11) | Report
Jinkies  +   489d ago
Oh yeah how did Crysis 2 work out for you guys......OH YEAH they screwed everyone over because they were working on the Xbox version way too much

Don't disagree...it's the truth, thats why Crysis 2 was a huge let down that year.

EDIT: Belo

Yeah that was MODS, not Crytek
#3.1.2 (Edited 489d ago ) | Agree(14) | Disagree(28) | Report
DoomeDx  +   489d ago
Yes indeed ^
Crysis 2 was amazing with DX11 + High resolution textures, and certain graphical mods
Ducky  +   489d ago
@up2013

You don't have to spend too much time thinking. Cevat clearly says that it's the PC version which will be the benchmark in graphics for the next two years, kinda like how the first Crysis was.

(Unless if you're referring to Jinkies by 'he', in which case, his comment doesn't do much to counter Cevat's claim)
#3.1.4 (Edited 489d ago ) | Agree(8) | Disagree(0) | Report
Series_IIa  +   489d ago
Jinkies, it sounds like someone just squeezed a lemon over your tender butthurt.
#3.2 (Edited 489d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(6) | Report | Reply
The_Infected  +   489d ago
The bubble system needs to be reworked because you say one thing wrong and piss some fanboys off there goes a bubble.
ChronoJoe  +   488d ago
It's probably because you spelled hi as high... it's pretty heinous.

That aside, it's probably because you posted something stupid. My opinion is often controversial but usually well-thought out. I mean, I might love Playstation as a brand, but I'm not stupid enough to argue The Last of Us, as graphically superior to the likes of the PC version of Crysis 3.

I've lost a bubble a couple of times but it came back. Just make sure you say something intelligent every once in a while, I know that might sound hard.
#3.4 (Edited 488d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
aviator189  +   489d ago
I really dislike crysis's story, especially the one in crysis 2, but the graphics are pretty darned amazing.
Hufandpuf  +   488d ago
My old TV got permanent screen tear damage from Crysis 2 because it looked so good.
yaz288  +   488d ago
the story of crysis 2 is so shit! annoying characters .. and it is just trying too hard.

I am actually disappointed with crysis 2 graphics .. the first one was better.

and also the physics (you were able to do some crazy stuff in crysis 1)
Walker  +   489d ago
Say hello to Naughty Dog cevat, just like last year !
Ezz2013  +   489d ago
uncharted 3 did beat crysis 2 on consoles
and untill today it has no match on sonsoles untill the last of us
but on pc it's another story
crysis 3 DX11 pc will look better than every single console game including the last of us and god of war ascension
#5.1 (Edited 489d ago ) | Agree(25) | Disagree(16) | Report | Reply
SnotyTheRocket  +   489d ago
Ah yes, but will it be as fun? hell no.
Ezz2013  +   489d ago
@snotytherocket

of course it won't
this is crytek after all... they make gfx and forget pretty much every thing else

and this talk will bite them in the A$$
like some here on N4G said before
"good dev's talk ....great dev's do"
#5.1.2 (Edited 489d ago ) | Agree(9) | Disagree(13) | Report
R6ex  +   489d ago
Games optimized for a single platform will perform better than unoptimized multiplates.
Norrison  +   489d ago
@SnotyTheRocket
There's a lot of PC games that are as fun as console games and have better graphics than everything consoles will ever have
SnotyTheRocket  +   488d ago
@everyone Seriously? Whats more fun, Uncharted or Crysis? I'm not hating on PC, I own a decent one, and play on it. But the fact of the matter is, just don't find Crysis all that fun.
dredgewalker  +   488d ago
Crysis 2 might have looked good but I lost interest in it after playing it. Bragging about graphics is like making a super car that breaks the sound barrier but isn't fun to drive! A great game isn't all about the graphics, it has to have good balanced gameplay too.
solid_warlord  +   488d ago
Crysis is an average shooter with above average graphics...nuff said
NagaSotuva  +   489d ago
Maybe in two years I'll have a PC that can run it.
R6ex  +   489d ago
I'll wait for Nvidia Maxwell refresh on 20nm in 2015 before playing Crysis 3.

Alternatively, if I strike lottery, I'll buy the GTX 690 to play it. Lol
Neoninja  +   489d ago
Very bold claim to make on the graphics, but that's only just a piece of what is needed. My concern is the overall gameplay. From what they said in the article it seems like the gameplay might be pretty fun, and much improved over Crysis 2 boring gameplay.

Seems like they took a page from Far Cry 3s book with how hunting plays apart with everything. Not necessarily a bad thing either if implemented correctly.
#7 (Edited 489d ago ) | Agree(8) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
AKS  +   489d ago
Crysis 2 was clearly rushed. I think the delays and patching in of DX11 and high resolution textures made this pretty obvious. The PC version in particular got off to a pretty dreadful start. I think Crytek learned that making their first big multiplatform game with a brand new game engine is actually can take quite a bit of time and effort. LOL. I don't expect these types of problems with Crysis 3, however, plus the early previews I've read have been pretty positive. A greater focus on stealth and variety was the right way to go.

It's going to be pretty tough to remain the graphics king for 2 years. I have my doubts about that, but I am glad to hear that they are pushing the envelope. The thing is that the new consoles are going to come out next year, which tends to raise the bar quite a bit as far as graphics standards. It will be much easier to make a multiplatform game with a higher top end on PC if you have DX11 consoles that have substantially more power. Those cool "next gen" engines that have been demoed will start becoming the platform for actual games.
CraigyScotsman  +   489d ago
All this guy talks about is graphics and hardware. He should try making a good game for once.
0pie  +   489d ago
i lol'd
DragonKnight  +   489d ago
"Crytek’s chief: Nothing will beat Crysis 3′s graphics for at least two years."

And everything will beat it's gameplay, story, music, playability, etc..
youndamie  +   489d ago
Peter Griffin voice: -_- "Shut Up Crytek"
soljah  +   489d ago
if this is really the case that nothing for 2 yrs will look better then crysis 3 then GOD HELP US ALL.
and i was so looking forward to ps4 and xbox 720. guess i will cancel my pre orders and just what 2 more yrs LOL
Tontus  +   489d ago
Maybe on PC although I think Metro: Last Light will look better and possibly Castlevania: Lords of Shadow 2 is that's a good port.

On consoles nothing will top God of War: Ascension. Just wait until we see what the final code looks like, it's going to blow minds. I can't wait until they start showing more of the single player.
The_Infected  +   489d ago
Have you seen the final code? Then you don't know if it will even look better than The Last of Us.
soljah  +   489d ago
hey tontus i was just thinking the same thing about gow a. i remember the gow3 demo and how unbelievably good it looked but when the final game launched HOLY F##K THE GRAPHIC UPGRADE WAS AMAZING
Ck1x  +   489d ago
He goes on to say in the article that Crysis 3 on PC will be a benchmark experience for at least 2 years... So he's clearly talking about what this game will look like on high spec PC's not consoles. To be honest companies like Crytek are primarily technology houses, more so than a talented games studio. Crysis 3 is basically a multi million dollar advertisement to try and license the engine to more developers. If they can show something off grand of what Cryengine 3 is truly capable of, then they hope to gain a leg up on Epic at the start of a new generation.
#14 (Edited 489d ago ) | Agree(9) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
thebudgetgamer  +   489d ago
Will it be fun?
youndamie  +   489d ago
Lol burnnn.
CoLD FiRE  +   489d ago
Graphically speaking, definitely! ;)
sonicsidewinder  +   489d ago
Of course, much more detail can be rendered when the game is made to cater to a corridor minded gamer mentality. If the game was gonna actually be 'like' Crysis should be, it should be islands, huge aliens and war all going on at once. This is just crysis 2 corridors with foliage.

It may be the best graphics on PC. But it'll be the best graphics on PC for a corridor shooter. Generic and trivial.

Is that really much kop?
#16 (Edited 489d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(7) | Report | Reply
SonyStyled  +   489d ago
sounds like a bunch of bs to me
pandehz  +   489d ago
Metro Last Light Cevat Metro Last Light
Eldyraen  +   489d ago
Metro is its biggest competition from what I've seen from the graphical side--plus I expect it to have a better story. Metro might had been a pain to run but it was a blast to play as the setting was superb.
aliengmr  +   489d ago
Good graphics won't make up for a game that won't let me decide what to do.

The thing I hated most about Crysis 2 was the very existence of the binoculars that showed your options. Crysis dropped you on an island(literally), gave you 4 suit powers, and let you figure out what to do. It also didn't have someone constantly screaming in your ear either.

It could be the best looking game ever, I still have zero interest in it at all.
R6ex  +   489d ago
Let's hope Crysis 3 is open-world as well.
aliengmr  +   489d ago
Technically Crysis wasn't open-world. It just didn't hold your hand.
Twignberries  +   489d ago
@aliengmr Actually if you really want to get technical, crysis 1 WAS open world, it just wasn't sandbox based (numerous side missions amongst an underlying main story, scattered across a world map e.g. FarCry 3)
aliengmr  +   488d ago
@Twignberries

No it really wasn't. Open World means you can traverse the entire game world without any restriction. You couldn't travel from later maps back to where you started.

What Crysis 1 did was give you very large linear levels. It feels very "open" but its not, and Crytek has even said as much.

I'm not hating on Crysis 1, its one of my all time favorites, an honor I don't bestow lightly.
SephirothX21  +   489d ago
If you've played with the CryEngine 3 sdk, then you know how powerful it is. Nothing will touch Crysis 3 graphically until UE4 games in 2014. CryEngine 4 vs UE4 will be a heck of a battle. With UE4 removing Unrealscript and using all c++ with Code View and Kismet 2, development will be much easier and faster. Though engines are not just about graphics.

http://www.youtube.com/watc...
Stevo2k  +   489d ago
In steps killzone 4 ;)
Skips  +   489d ago
Agreed, Killzone 3 looked way better than Crysis 2. On consoles anyway.
WetN00dle69  +   488d ago
WAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Skips  +   488d ago
Can you not read? Or are you just blind? LMAO. Killzone 3 COMPLETELY destroys Crysis 2 on consoles.

"WAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!"

Oh I get you. No need to cry bud!

LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL
Plagasx  +   489d ago
Has he even seen Metro Last Light?
eliteslaya13  +   489d ago
I can't help but cringe whenever this guy speaks. He swears up the ass.
Max-Zorin  +   489d ago
That arrogance.
animegamingnerd  +   489d ago
crytek i will only care about your games if you have great gameplay and a awesome story and not focus on graphics
Roccetarius  +   489d ago
Can we just remove this guy for good? He's doing more harm than good for them, which isn't surprising.
RuperttheBear  +   489d ago
Considering that he's the president of the company I'd say that won't be happening anytime soon. While I think he does talk up his games a lot, he's not really much different from many other people who are making games and proud of them.

And his comments in interviews tend to get cherry picked for headlines, so it makes him look worse.
#26.1 (Edited 489d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
landog  +   489d ago
crysis 3 comes out when?

march, pffff.....theres a TON of pc games that will come out between then and dec. 31st

we have no way of knowing how amazing they will look

obviously crysis 3 will look better on pc than any console game, crysis 1 from 2007 maxed on pc looks better than any console game ever made, but, when you talk "the best graphics" anyone with half a brain knows you must be refering to pc and not 8 year old consoles

why do people keep saying "the last of us" and mentioning uncharted 3, those games look AMAZING for console games, but any oridinary AAA pc game from the last 5 years looks far better hands down

when we talk cutting edge tech, xbox360(2004 hardware) and ps3 (2005 hardware) should not even be thought of

i love my ps3 and 360, heck i still love my ds and psp, but i dont expect to ever be impressed by anything graphically on any of them, since uncharted 2 nothing on any console has made me think, wow, amazing graphics....so what though, they give me AMAZING gameplay

i still play pc games from 2001 that look bloddy terrible, but they are fun as hell, thats what counts

crytek, lets see some amazing gameplay to go along with those great visuals, first crysis and warhead were great games, crysis 2....mehh...it was ok, lets see you do something amazing visually and conceptually!
#27 (Edited 489d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(4) | Report | Reply
akaakaaka  +   489d ago
Look mods for crysis 1 do make the game look better but crysis retail vertion without mods do not look better.

Why don't we let moders mode killzone 2 or uncharted 3 today? Will it be fair for me to say killzone 2 a 5years old game looks better.. I will sound stupid ane that's how you sound.
Guess what be exited that consoles will bring new tech ideas and games because most you will get them for pc to.
Pc high end card never reach 50% of their real capability and that is sad, you are been rip off.
#27.1 (Edited 489d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(4) | Report | Reply
gabeybabey  +   489d ago
He's probably right.
Well, at lease the PC version will.
ninjahunter  +   489d ago
Ugh, its frightening how stubborn people can be. On paper nothing will compete with it at all, not even metro. Metro does have quite the tech suite, but Crysis one ups it, then makes every effect and visual real time. I know People will hate on crysis for its bad gameplay, and its lack of perfect visuals, but at the end of the day even crysis 2 trumps everything.
nofallouthero  +   489d ago
from what i have seen of cryengine3 hes probably right
« 1 2 »

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories

What We Want In: Tomb Raider 2

8m ago - "The 2013 reboot garnered critical acclaim, and several Game of the Year nominations (we even con... | PC
10°

The Wolf Among Us Review | Tablet Game Reviews

8m ago - The Wolf Among Us is an amazing, totally immersive gaming experience like no other. | iPhone

Final Fantasy X/X-2 HD Remaster Review | KaboomShark

9m ago - KaboomShark: "For $40, the Final Fantasy X/X-2 HD Remaster bundle is an amazing value and I canno... | PS3

0rbitalis Preview | The Indie Mine

13m ago - The Indie Mine takes a look at 0RBITALIS, an Early Access physics puzzler that tasks you with mas... | PC
Ad

Dark Souls II Review

Now - Drew digs deep into Dark Souls II and delivers a first… | Promoted post
30°

Final Fantasy X/X-2 HD Remaster Sells 208,000 In U.S.

21m ago - Final Fantasy X/X-2 HD Remaster was released in the U.S. on March 18th, and the game sold 208,000... | PS3
Related content from friends