Valve recently announced their plans to launch a console in 2013 that will directly compete against Sony & Microsoft in the Next-Gen console war. One would think that a new player in the console arena would start off at a big disadvantage, and that probably would be true for most companies. But if any company has the capacity to deal some big punches, its Valve.
I know the advantage of consoles is optimizing for specific hardware and knowing a game will work immediately after you put it in but if Valve can work out a deal with a GPU maker that allows for a specific "SteamBox" GPU so devs would still know exactly what hardware they're working with.
Maybe have 3 versions of the SteamBox like one capable of medium settings, high settings, ultra settings, etc. The hardware would be the same for each specific version so devs know exactly what they're working with. And gamers can upgrade their "Basic Steam Box" to Ultra anytime they want by buying a better Steam GPU/RAM pack.
Take the best of both consoles and PC - optimization, confidence that your game with work the second you put it in and upgradability.
For PC gamers, SteamBox doesn't really mean anything except for (perhaps) better-optimized multiplatform games in the future. But for console gamers, Steambox would be a great introduction to the wide, wide world of PC gaming.
Specifically biometrics and their holodeck-sounding tech.
Ohwaitaminit...
Remember portal 2? I think valve would be a good sport and allow a ps4 to steam box to desktop multi-player. That would be the first tri-cross multi-player event! I know they like to do game changing things so who knows.
Also devs would love to have one big community.
Also seeing that you can sign into steam with your psn account means they won't just erase your account and games that you bought on steam.
This whole creating their own console seems to be throwing that idea out the door, and it sucks. Cross platform play between PS3/4 and PC sounds awesome.
Sony is obviously interested in it being they gave Valve the go ahead, while MS didn't. (even though Newell had stupid remarks about PS3) And you see them pushing it with the Vita.
Also, microsoft did cross platform gaming long before sony ever did, sorry.
Above, sony would never allow valve to sell games that they didnt make on PS3 like they do with steam. That would mean that they would take money from sony and actually have good prices. Sony and MS DONT want steam prices on their consoles, that is apparent.
Microsoft on the other hand is the king of "timed exclusive" crap, and now those deals will most likely hurt the PC market too. Then MS is going to try and compete with Steam on the PC even more. Xbox was put there because Sony and Nintendo were threatening the PC gaming market, why would MS not counter attack something thats direct competition to that?
As fans this sucks. Now we have a 3rd (4th) console that is going to attempt exclusive stuff... ugh!
I went from PC gaming to console gaming because of the upgrades and constant updates. When on console, you are set for years. On PC you are not. The PS3 was bad with updates, but they slowly fixed that now too. I Hate opening steam because it almost always needs a damn update.
Its also why I cant take phone gaming seriously. They have these amazing devices, yet can't put crappy little games on a phone older than 6 months because something new came out? ugh again
Seriously though I hope they add a more positive competition unlike MS who like to nickle and dime we need more competition who looks out for the consumer rather than themselves.
We already know Valve are quite generous when it comes to their steam sales so hopefully this continues to translate with their new console.
Microsoft on the other-hand... Do not...
You seen Windows 8 lately? It flopped badly...