EuroGamer: "Five years on, Mass Effect is still a good-looking game - it's more refined on PlayStation 3 but it's missing motion blur and anti-aliasing."
(Mass Effect, PS3)
It doesn't matter because it doesn't affect he gameplay while in motion and you wouldn't even notice; as a matter of fact, the 360 version looks fuzzier when you slow it down, but again, when in full motion, you probably won't notice that, either.
I've played through mass effect on the 360 atleast 5 times. I've played about 7 hours on the ps3 now and my opinion is the ps3 version is better. Loading times are pretty close to the same, the graphics look cleaner and the framerate does drop a little but nowhere near as bad as the 360 version.
I was going to wait for the Digital Foundry report on the Mass Effect PS3 port, but gave in and bought it, (was only $15). Overall I'm happy to of just got to be able to play the first game, (I only own a PS3). It's not even funny though how the first is far greater then the other two installments IMO, but that's another topic...
I wonder though, if having a SSD installed into your PS3 would vastly improve the performance/loadtimes like it did with Gran Turismo 5.
Now - We are looking for awesome people who are interested in testing the new N4G and other new services that are set to launch later this year. | Promoted post
Now - We are looking for awesome people who are interested in testing the new N4G and other new services that are set to launch later this year. | Promoted post
That's called fuzzy images, lol.
Bummer. So if you want the best version, PC is it with all the DLC and all the performance your PC can handle.
I wonder though, if having a SSD installed into your PS3 would vastly improve the performance/loadtimes like it did with Gran Turismo 5.