Tom Chick: Calling a game disappointing arguably has more to do with me than the game itself. Disappointment isn’t an inherent quality. It can’t exist without some sort of expectation in the first place. In many cases, these games are sequels, or the creations of developers with proven track records, or entries in established genres. But for various reasons, the central fact about these games is that I had hoped to like them better.
Kingdoms of Amalur: The Reckoning....Really this is such an under rated game everyone should play it just to see how awesome the combat is, also the world is beautiful
sleeping dogs has brought some fresh ideas to the open world gaming so stop hating
Resident evil 6 deserves to be on this list, sad thing is it sold good to where capcom won't learn from their mistakes and next one will be even worst
That game is the definition of a let-down and lie. It fit more in the PS2 era than it did this gen.
RE6 was definitely the bigger disappointment, especially after all the promises of horror and going back to its roots
Racoon City its simply bad.
All that article was, was his opinion and he is entitled to it. Just a much as you are by saying what you said. But one of you looks more like a douche then the other.
vallencer you sound more like a douche?
Storywise, FC3 was pretty bad. But as an open world shooter it was great. Superior to FC2.
The sense I get is the author is upset that the game wasn't made just for him. That it was disappointing that he was consulted first before the game was released. That's just my opinion of course.
Some people have too many expectations for videogames.