The Good And Bad of Battlefield 3, One Year (Or So) Later

Kotaku - Last year, Swedish-based developers Digital Illusions CE set out to launch not just a game, but an experience—an ever-changing and evolving experiment, if you will—which would serve as a platform from which future Battlefield titles would stem.

More than a year after the release, after more than a year of patches, updates, rule-changes and several massive expansions, how has Battlefield 3 held up?

[Cam977]

Custom servers can still be bad, I hate getting kicked for killing the host! I remember climbing a tower, finding and killing a camper to be kicked - total BS!

[Zha1tan]

The game still has latency issues that were present in beta.

i.e getting killed instantly, getting killed when behind solid cover.

Yet they spew out DLC.

[yodawins]

are you kidding me? every multyplayer game has latency issues.

[sovietsoldier]

this right here is what i hate besides normal glitches/ bugs.

http://www.pbbans.com/mbi-l...

[DSQD-Detox]

The game is awesome

[KangarooSam]

Whoah whoah whoah whoah whoah, everyone slow the f*** down: no one's b*tched about it being a Kotaku article yet.

[Burnin]

good article... even if is from Kotaku.

@Detox: the game IS awesome!

Too bad I can barely touch it since there are so many good games out there right now... and more coming :S

[Hufandpuf]

Well, Kotaku posted it, but David Veselka from MP1st wrote it.