30°
Submitted by ftwrthtx 579d ago | opinion piece

What Our Review Scores Really Mean | TerminalGamer

TG writes: Ever wonder what’s behind review scores and what they really mean? (3DS, iPad, iPhone, Nintendo DS, PC, PS Vita, PS3, Wii, Wii U, Xbox 360)

dbjj12088  +   580d ago
Wow, excellent insight into the process behind reviews. Thanks!
ftwrthtx  +   580d ago
Always nice to know what's behind a review score.
knifefight  +   579d ago
More sites should publish these and make them more visible, because the numbers mean different things to different people. Knowing how the reviewer is seeing it is key.

But of course, people focusing on the WORDS of the review -- those hundreds and hundreds of words -- would help even more.
ftwrthtx  +   579d ago
If a review is less than 1000 words, it's pointless.
Hicken  +   579d ago
And the numbers MATCHING the words would be best of all.

Edit: I mean it as a total package. Knowing what the points mean to a particular reviewer is great, but that STILL doesn't stop a reviewer from having a written review that doesn't reflect the score attached. Nor does it prevent a reviewer from being inconsistent with his or her reviewing standards.

As for interpretation of the scale, I don't think it should be open to interpretation. That would make aggregate sites like metacritic more credible, and just glancing at the score for a game would be viable. Otherwise, each reviewer's score would have to be weighted before being added to an aggregate, and we both know that's not going to happen.

And with metacritic becoming more and more relevant within the industry- though I don't really care for it, myself- we need the scores included to be something we can rely upon BEFORE they get added.
#3.2 (Edited 579d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
knifefight  +   579d ago
But that's entirely subjective and your comment misses the point.
Obviously the number matches the writer's interpretation of a numerical scale -- or else he/she wouldn't put that number at the end. They just not might always match the reader's. That's no one's fault and literally can not be avoided. People see scales how they see them.

However, understanding can be achieved when you can realize that the way the writer views a number and the way YOU view a number may in fact be different.

I see the average game as a 5/10. WebsiteX sees the average game as a 7.5/10. If I read a review and say "WTF that sounds like a 6!" when they gave something an 8, *I* am in fact, in the wrong. Their average is different than mine, and I have to consider this when considering whether text "matches" a score or not.

And really, if you read the text...do you need a score? ;)
#3.2.1 (Edited 579d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report
ftwrthtx  +   579d ago
A well written review doesn't need a score but wcores give a better way for comparisons.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
20°

Fighting Fantasy: Starship Traveller Review | PixelPerfectGaming

1h ago - Since the inception of the Fighting Fantasy series, esteemed fantasy writer Steve Jackson has sen... | Android
40°

3 reasons why I’m excited for Tales of Xillia 2

1h ago - With Bandai Namco Games’ Tales of Xillia 2 just over a month away from release here are three rea... | PS3
30°

Sniper Elite III Review | High-Def Digest

1h ago - A huge improvement over the fun but flawed 'Sniper Elite' and 'Sniper Elite V2,' 'Sniper Elite II... | Xbox 360
40°

Valiant Hearts : The Great War (Xbox One) Review - Arcade Wednesday

1h ago - When it comes to video games inspired by World War events, we're usually shown the grim side of c... | Xbox One
Ad

Study Game Design at DeVry

Now - DeVry University, is an accredited* university offering you the flexibility of over 90 locations, online courses and a wide variety of bachelor's a... | Promoted post
30°

Wrestling Game Vs. Wrestling Reality: WWF No Mercy

1h ago - What was better -- 'WWF No Mercy', or the six months of 2000-era WWF it was based on? | Retro