Submitted by doctorstrange 758d ago | news

Far Cry 3 PS3 Install Size Revealed: 6.2GB

While the Blu-ray drive allows for huge gaming experiences that use up the whole 50GB that the discs can hold, an unfortunate side effect is that a lot of games have to have data installed on the PS3 because the data is read slower. Far Cry 3 is one such games, and PSLS can reveal that the game will take up a whopping 6.2GB. (Far Cry 3, PS3)

ftwrthtx  +   758d ago
That's a big chunk of game.
dbjj12088  +   758d ago
There are some incredible textures in the game (it seems) so that must make up a bulk of the data.
dazzrazz  +   758d ago
There are no incredible textures on consoles, everything is low details compared to pc. The only reason they force people to dump most of the game on hdd is extremely slow 2x speed blu ray mounted in ps3 units.
Foolsjoker  +   758d ago
Not a fan of this becoming the norm for games now.
Dasteru  +   758d ago

2x Blu ray = 9MB/s
Every 1x increase is a constant 4.5MB/s

Every 1x increase on DVD is 1MB/s max but alternates to nearly half at times.

The reason it needs to install data is because it is uncompressed to make use of the extra storage space on the disk.

More data to read = longer read time = installs to compensate.
#1.1.3 (Edited 758d ago ) | Agree(7) | Disagree(4) | Report
Ju   758d ago | Trolling | show
rainkore  +   758d ago
That isn't too terrible. It's no World of Warcraft.
FanboyPunisher  +   758d ago
36GB I think its around these days..lol.

But thats a PC platform not PC. Desktops have tons of space and usually multi drives these days.

I'm getting Farcry 3 for PC def, wouldn't want to do injustice by playing it on console and seeing it in its lesser form.
darkride66  +   757d ago
It's always been a head scratcher for me why installs on PS3 are an evil thing, but no one bats an eye at mammoth PC installs, which we've been doing for decades. I don't know about the slims but it was one screw to remove my PS3 harddrive chassis and upgrade my drive. It's not like storages space should be a concern.
showtimefolks  +   758d ago

look man i wish PC gamers had their own sites because all any of you do is come on every article and talk about how superior the PC game is which it is. go enjoy it and leave the console gamers to our low textures and bad exclusives

i am sure you can enjoy halo 4,gears3,last of us,uncharted,god of war,zelda,mari etc,,,on PC oh wait

Farcry 3 looks stunning and i can't wait to get my hands on it. next tuesday mess effect trilogy and far cry 3


lol sorry. and i wish you luck in that stay alive part lol
#1.3 (Edited 758d ago ) | Agree(17) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
JoGam  +   758d ago
Dude I can't wait till Farcry 33 comes out. Damn you seen footage too? Hopefully im still alive to see it launch. :-)
#1.3.1 (Edited 758d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report
dirthurts  +   758d ago
Don't worry. Another year and the new consoles will be looming and things will be a little bit more balanced between pc and consoles again. For a few years.
Some console games do have fantastic textures. It's possible with the right engine.
Don't be dissing the consoles, especially when it's a platform neutral article.
MysticStrummer  +   758d ago
They do have their own sites, but how can they pretend to be superior if they go to those sites? Most people there have decent gaming PCs, and more than a few will have better tech than the garden variety N4G PC troll has.
chcolatesnw  +   758d ago
Well after spending 2k on mine i like the bragging rights come with it. And so do others. What if you had a Lamborghini and every neighbour in a 5 block radius had a pos wagon. I would drive up and down and in circles before and after work and every sunday so all them hill billies can see the shiny thing. Its human nature, and i welcome the negatives im going to get from the simple minded fanboys, in fact i embrace them, they make me laugh :DDDDDD
Autodidactdystopia  +   758d ago
I wish console gamers had their own sites to go to all they do is come around here and bitch and discriminate against pc gamers. if you dont wanna hear it go enjoy your low rez stuff you love so much.

this website is for comments... good or bad its gonna happen. LOL

IDGAF about people i just like to argue

but i dont argue when im wrong, that would be....well... wrong.
#1.3.5 (Edited 758d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(4) | Report
Ju  +   758d ago
@chcolatesnw I'd think it's called immature, tbh.
dj3boud  +   757d ago
why is this news?
dbjj12088  +   758d ago
That's so much space. I don't mind deleting the install data of games I'm not playing anymore, but I didn't think my 160gb PS3 would fill up this fast.
Conzul  +   758d ago

It's what I used. I recommend it so HIGHLY that I used capslock just there. That's how HIGHLY.

It'll hold all your PS+ games, your physical media installs, and a large photo/music/video collection to boot. I have a "Cinema" folder with HD movies that's reached 51GB. These drives also reduce loading screen durations, but won't really increase actual in-game fidelity/performance.

And when the PS4 comes out and has a sub-par HDD inside, just swap it with this one from your PS3.
BigStef71  +   758d ago
Is that the highest you can upgrade your hardrive to? I was looking to get a new one for my ps3 but I wanted one that has a TB of storage capacity. What do you think?
Conzul  +   758d ago

Well they have one higher tiered model that's 8GBSSD/750GBHDD. That's actually the one I have. It costs ~$130 on newegg right about now.

In a PS3 system, about 690GB of that is recognized. Just go with that one. Totally worth it vs. a slower but larger drive.
#2.1.2 (Edited 758d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report
insertcoin  +   758d ago
Sometimes I think the digital revolution is just a conspiracy by the hard drive manufacturers to force me to buy their products and waste my time downloading and deleting and downloading and deleting again.
ftwrthtx  +   758d ago
They want all of us to invest into their largest, most expensive HDs aruond.
ab5olut10n  +   758d ago
or in a $99 500GB drive. that too is a thing.
ftwrthtx  +   758d ago
I have a 500GB HD. It is down to 40GB free. I hate having to redownload games, so I need a bigger drive.
animegamingnerd  +   758d ago
why did sony ever feel the need for the installs on the PS3 i will never know why
bubblebeam  +   758d ago
Decreases load times, as Blu-ray reads slower than DVD.

I would love it if they gave the option to install every game. It really isn't a hassle. I just read the manual or get something to eat while it is installing, AND I put up with less issues in the game.

It's a win-win situation.
Siren30  +   758d ago
I've never had a problem with installs either, I usually do my workouts while waiting so I don't feel guilty sitting several hours while playing the game.
animegamingnerd  +   758d ago
i see why but the problem i had with PS3 installs was that i have a old 40 gig PS3
bubblebeam  +   758d ago

I understand. I'd hate to be the guy to suggest getting a bigger HD, as the 3rd party ones are very cheap.

I never had that problem myself, as I have an original 'Phat' PS3 (love saying that), and intalls weren't a big issue back then. I ended up buying a slim a few years later, and that's when installs became more popular.

The big boy only gets taken out when I need to play some old PS1 and PS2 games. It is in mint condition.
Oh_Yeah  +   758d ago
Because for most games the ps3 needs them in order to keep performance up to par. The bluray drive spins at speeds of only 2x which is slow..so it needs help with streaming the data ya know? That's where the installs to the hard drive come in. Depends on the type of game and how it was coded also.. Such as God of War 3 which is around 40 gbs and it needs no install.
#4.2 (Edited 758d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
mushroomwig  +   758d ago
It's not Sony, it's the developers. Look at the Uncharted series, not a single install required.
Ben_Grimm  +   758d ago
Far Cry 3 is very different in terms of gameplay and design from the Uncharted series.
onandonandon  +   758d ago
Uncharted takes a few mins to start though
Norrison  +   758d ago
Uncharted is linear, far cry is open world, get some common sense.
Minato-Namikaze  +   758d ago
Infamous doesn't have installs does it?
floetry101  +   758d ago
Infamous doesn't have to be reproduced on 3 different platforms with stricter publishing deadlines either.

Look at it logically. Far Cry 3 is a multi-platform title and unquestionably a much, much larger and more detailed world than either Infamous 1 or 2. Uncharted is made by a development team that know the console inside-out and better than anyone in the business because they produce games EXCLUSIVELY for it.

If people are annoyed by game installations (something that has been happening with games for almost 3 decades), then I weep for the future.
#4.3.5 (Edited 758d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report
Ju  +   758d ago
I'd guess there is a way to dynamically cache the data. But the fact is, both games load assets from HDD because it is quite faster. And yes, UC is easier to implement because it is linear. Try going backward in the game and you see some hick ups.

Using the HDD to cache data is a great idea. Pre-loading in an open world game makes the whole experience while playing a bit smoother. But true, Infamous2 is "open" and does not install, but probably does just what I mentioned. It dynamically caches textures when loading the first time. Would probably work with FC also, but gives you some "pop ins" at first (???). Level design can also a factor. How assets are placed in the world can make a difference. FC is very "random" in that aspect. Can be another reason that dynamically loading won't work. I'm just speculating, but there are just various reasons why things are implemented how they are.

@above. Ubi took the time to optimize the PS3 quite a bit. So your argument is invalid there. (see link above).
#4.3.6 (Edited 758d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report
MariaHelFutura  +   757d ago
Yes Infamous 2 has an install, it is 1.3 GB/1300 MB. But yes, most PS3 exclusive games don't have massive installs.
SoundGamer  +   757d ago
Borderlands 2 didn't require an install on PS3 either.
AKS  +   758d ago
Why do you think a HDD was included with every single PS3? To give you some extra space to download porn?

Having a standard HDD can reduce load times and make things run smoother. It can also reduce the work the Blu-ray drive has to do. Try listening to the Blu-ray drive when you're playing a really demanding game that has no install. It tends to be very busy. I had a BD-ROM drive go out on me before. I'd much rather put the stress on the hard drive than have to replace a Blu-ray drive again.
yesmynameissumo  +   758d ago
My 1TB drive laughs at this.
josephayal  +   758d ago
Holy crap biggest open world eva, 5x bigger than GTAV
onandonandon  +   758d ago
I'd fully install every game if i could!
Bathyj   758d ago | Trolling | show | Replies(3)
blakstarz  +   758d ago
PS3 60GIG upgraded to 500GIG = WHO CARES, BRING IT ON!!
miyamoto  +   758d ago
i envy u

here have a bubble
Hazmat13  +   758d ago
good thing i got a new ps3. its not that bad im going go insane over a 6g install. oh well good games needs space to be fucking awesome! with a open world single player, co op, competitive multiplayer, map editor and a single player editor. its all kinds of fun!
rbluetank  +   758d ago
once i finish RE5 for having plus, i will delete it and there is my space need for Frycry 3.
#11 (Edited 758d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
BLAKHOODe  +   757d ago
I'm using up WAYYYY too much HDD space as is with all the Plus titles I've downloaded. I've already had to delete quite a bit of stuff. I can't afford to lose another 6.2 GB.. IF I decide to pick up Far Cry 3, I might have to resort to getting it on Xbox.
kma2k  +   757d ago
personally i like this anything to speed up load times & take off some wear & tear off the laser im all for. I do wish however all games had an install option!
Deku-Johnny  +   757d ago
The comments on this article confuse me. The Wii U has a 1GB update and everyone says it's an outrage, a game has a 6.2GB install and suddenly that's acceptable. Having such a big install on a game is proof that the PS4 needs to come out.
MrBeatdown  +   757d ago
The difference is that one needs to be downloaded.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
New stories

The best PS4 and Vita exclusives of 2014

10m ago - At first glance, the PlayStation 4 and PS Vita were a little light on quality exclusives. But at... | PS4

Naked Nord Run Proves ESO Community Has Fun

11m ago - Skyrim Fansite writes: "The Naked Nord run proves that the ESO community knows how to have a good... | PC

Square Enix Shutting Down Kaku-San-Sei Million Arthur For Smartphones

12m ago - But, Kaku-San-Sei Million Arthur will live on. Service for the Amazon App Store, Nintendo 3DS, an... | iPhone

11 Problems Only Call Of Duty Players Will Understand

14m ago - From noob-tubers to campers. An insight in to the everyday problems of a COD addict. | PC

Win a PS4!!

Now - Join us on Filmwatch to find out how you can win a free PS4 this holiday season! | Promoted post

Top 8 Terrible Game Peripherals

15m ago - 411mania: "I define a peripheral as “anything you add to an already existing console, or somethin... | Culture