WC writes: We all know that there are tons of great games out there. And simultaneously, there are a lot of games that are, for lack of a better term, complete crap. And of course, us gamers share our existence with people we call critics that get paid to review those games.
A lot of the time, these critics are pretty accurate in their reviews. But there are always exceptions. Here are just a few examples of those exceptions.
290°
150°
70°
120°
Ad 
70°
0°
0°
10°
10°
10°
There's no such thing as "wrong review."
An opinion is an opinion. But you have the choice to ignore it.
My favorite moment in his ramblings is when he attacks the review of Battlefield Bad Company 2. I agree the Rob Taylor missed the mark. But the irony is he infers Taylor is a COD fanboy. Yet the writer himself clealry fits the same definition when reviewing Battlefield 3. He considers the campaign in BF3 to be a ripoff of Black Ops. Really? Don't be greedy, pass that fat blunt around. He tries to include himself in the erred review category yet while pointing out the faults of others in their writings he fails to acknowledge specifics in the shortcomings of his own worthless pieces.
Reviews are opinions. There is no way to prove an opinion wrong. You can agree or disagree, but even a lot of people disagreeing doesn't make it wrong. Even if I agree with some of the points you made, I would never disagree that the writer has a right to feel the way they do.
But hey, you put yourself over. #1!!! Good job. Clearly you never believed anything you said to begin with if you can turn around and say you were spectacularly wrong about 10 opinions you had on 10 games.
you're going to complain that gamespot gave resident evil 6 a bad score? that game completely deserved it on every level and many many other reviewers agreed.
yeah, this article sucks
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-g...
since im not sure about this i can just say, i dont like your style and you are very biased in your opinion. please let us know all of your future opinions on games...
...just like anyone needs to know
Nothing like calling someone's opinion wrong through your own opinion piece...immature article is immature.
Top 10 list on 10 pages.
10, 9, and 8 on the list seemed pretty weak targets for an otherwise interesting idea for a list.
But then #7.
“With 23 installments (all of which have received critical acclaim), 5 film adaptations, 2 CGI movies, 7 novels, and several other creations,”
Critical acclaim? Really?
IMDB, those 5 films. 34%, 21%, 22%, 24%, and 29%.
Raccoon City had previously gotten pretty bad reviews as well. And that’s as far as I’m going to go into the past on that. Then, most other reviews for the game were pretty negative as well. Why is this one singled out?