Assassin's Creed III - PC Performance Analysis

DSOGaming writes: "Remember when Ubisoft stated that it was putting a lot of effort on the PC port of Assassin’s Creed III? Remember when it stated that PC gamers would be happy – and proud – about the PC version of it? Remember when the company said that the delay of the PC version was in order to ensure that it would be optimized for the PC platform? Well, as usual, none of them were true. Assassin’s Creed III PC is an awful console port, with a DX11 renderer that is seriously bugged and does not perform as good as the older DX9 one that was used in all previous versions of Assassin’s Creed. Not only that, but the game does not take advantage of multi-core CPUs, meaning that each and everyone will be CPU limited in the blink of an eye."

Read Full Story >>
The story is too old to be commented.
Muffins12231820d ago

Tired of developers doing this shit.Sometimes I fell like all they care about is money and they only have there attention on which system makes them the most money for there games....

lociefer1820d ago

i consider myself lucky i was able to finish the game with the lower than crap fps i was getting, i cant believe wut a mess the game code is

kesvalk1820d ago

good thing i didn't brought it then.

ProjectVulcan1820d ago (Edited 1820d ago )

Ditto. I'll consider this game as good as not out yet until it gets a couple of patches.

AC3 PC release date: pushed back 3 months or so for me.....

Snookies121820d ago

Whew, glad I stuck with consoles for the AC series... I'll be picking this up later on at some point for sure though. As a primarily PC gamer, this is just unfortunate to hear though. They need to get some new people in there that know what they're doing with PC or something, because this does not sound like an adequate job.

pr0digyZA1820d ago (Edited 1820d ago )

? ac series have had great ports on PC, and even this which is considered one of the worst still performed a lot better than the console versions.

Snookies121820d ago

Not from what I've seen. AC 2 looked to perform worse than the PS3 or 360 counterparts. I haven't seen how Brotherhood or Revelations perform though.

pr0digyZA1820d ago

Well there are lots of benchmarks for the second game that show it running perfectly, I personally have brotherhood and revelations and they run at over 60fps on a 560ti.

Sarcasm1820d ago

Snookies12, you probably need to re-check.

AC2, AC Brotherhood, and AC Revelations runs 60fps locked for me.

AC3 also runs buttery smooth for me too.

BushLitter1820d ago

I'm have an absolutely smooth performance. Running everything on very high except AA (which is on high). I have a an i5 and Nvidia GTX560. I did have framerate issues when running AA on very high when i was swinging through the trees, but just dropped it a notch and everything's smooth as silk.

I've played AC on PS3, ACII on 360, Brotherhood and Revelations on PS3 and now ACIII on PC

The latter has thus far been the best experience by far

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1820d ago
Mariusmssj1820d ago

If you look at eurogamer analysis console versions have frame drops to 15fps

KrisButtar1820d ago

from what i read and see, online pc gamers always seem to get the shitty end of the stick until the mods come out

Show all comments (32)
The story is too old to be commented.