60°
Submitted by YOLO_2012 981d ago | review

Call of Duty Black Ops Declassified Review

GameReactor Denmark writes: Some challenges can be cozy to go by, and if the AI ​​was so shaking his head bad, could be good entertainment in the many small missions, but it can not mask the fact that in the best case is a bad game, although there may squeeze some fun out here and there. Can the developer have rigged the problems of stability and multiplayer, there is potential there. For basic mechanics nothing wrong - in the part. However, it is difficult to give a mark of hope. (Call of Duty: Black Ops Declassified, PS Vita) 2/10

KLegend_99  +   981d ago
Alright we get it! Critics don't like black ops declassified, but im glad a lot of people on youtube enjoy it.
Welshy  +   981d ago
It's bordering on MoH: Warfighter material now.

The voice of the internet has decreed it a bad game, so everyone is in a bum rush to agree and jump on the sub-4/10 band wagon.

If it's a massively polarizing or complex game, the huge amount of reviews are good to get a sense of what's what, but a constant stream of 2, 3 and 4/10 scores is just beating a dead horse.

We get the point now!
KING85  +   980d ago
I ordered my Vita yesterday during the Assassin's Creed sale, but I think I may just pass on the Declassified. Bought MOH on PC and I regret paying the $40 I spent. It's not as horrid as people may think, but it certainly does not hold up to today's standard shooters. Hopefully another COD game will grace the Vita with a much stronger effort as I heard the dev time was limited. Getting a more established dev team would help.
PoSTedUP  +   979d ago
yeah knew it was gonna be bad, just by the developers and how resistanceVita was, resistance was ok but the aiming feel to the analogue sticks was destined to ruin this cod game, cod HAS to be fluent and quick on the aiming controls or it will be garbage.
Kingthrash360  +   981d ago
They had to pay... Instead of gettin paid this time. There angry.
Cod vita 7.8
ambientFLIER  +   980d ago
7.8 for a full-price rehash of a two year old game, with no campaign, zombies, missing features and tiny maps with only 8 players that only work half of the time? Kay...

Also, THERE =/ THEY'RE
Kingthrash360  +   980d ago
Sounds like a typical cod game to me guy. Who plays it for the sp? yes it woulda been nice if it was good but really mp is its bread and butter. we all know all cod's are rehashes of a 4 year old game and yes zombies shoulda been added but what can u expect from a handheld?? its only 2 gigs dam. still its better than resistance but some how get a lower score? sounds like people are buthurt for having to pay for the over priced game instead of gettin a free copy.

Thanks for correcting my spellcheck its an ass sometimes.
ambientFLIER  +   977d ago
Um...I expect to get ALL the features if I'm paying full price. if they priced it at $20, I'd have no problems with it.
Nes_Daze  +   981d ago
Gamereactor, not surprised, they're usually very harsh on every damn game.
bayonetta  +   980d ago
ouch
arabiensoldier  +   980d ago
The Critics hate the game yet Users like it (yet they still state it has its faults), I'll wait on this one until a lower price is made available.
admiralvic  +   980d ago
Critics are looking at the whole package, where as most fans just say "it's the CoD experience on the go and has fantastic multiplayer". I really think this is just a hard game to review, since you can EASILY make a case for it being good or bad.
arabiensoldier  +   980d ago
agreed
mangoman3000  +   980d ago
why activision didn't develope the game,SONY should know better.SONY bend studio would have done a better job
arabiensoldier  +   980d ago
People need to realize that just like with Resistance BS, Nihilistic had barley anytime to develop BO:Declassified.
rpd123  +   980d ago
Yeah, it's hard to blame Nihilistic when the people in charge of giving the game to a studio to develop the game didn't leave enough time to actually develop a game.
TheUndertaker85  +   979d ago
Normal gamers playing the game like it
Game reviewers don't

Normal gamers are used to paying for their games
Game reviewers aren't

Normal gamers paid for this title like they do many others
Game reviewers paid for this title unlike the other hundreds, if not thousands of games they "review"

Normal gamers are reviewing this game favorably
Game reviewers are reviewing this game negatively

Based on this trend, couldn't we easily come to the conclusion that game reviewers are just pissed off because for once in their lifetime they have to pay for a game to review it instead of just being handed the game and being told to enjoy it?

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
40°

Fans Don't Think Smash Bros.' New Tournament Modes Are Good Enough

1h ago - Super Smash Bros. got a big update today, adding something that fans of Nintendo’s colorful mash-... | Wii U
40°

SuperPhillip Central: Badland: Game of the Year Edition (Wii U eShop) Review

1h ago - SPC writes, "Badland originally released on iOS and Android two years ago and was hugely celebrat... | Wii U
Ad

Warhammer: Arcane Magic Comes to iOS

Now - Test your tactics against legendary foes! | Promoted post
40°

Senran Kagura: Estival Versus adds Senran Kagura 2’s Kagura, Naraku this fall

2h ago - In addition to the previously announced downloadable characters, Senran Kagura: Estival Versus wi... | PS4
40°

Guild of Dungeoneering Review | Quarter to Three

2h ago - "These new heroes are a joy to discover, but the game doesn’t give you any incentive to explore t... | PC
40°

Nsync Playthrough with Zach

3h ago - Zach takes the plunge with a Gameboy classic and tries to Get to the Show with J-T and company. | Retro