50°
Submitted by shepard2186 837d ago | news

Hero-U Developers Reveal First Stretch Goal as Kickstarter Deadline Nears

Oprainfall writes: "When the Kickstarter campaign for Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux role-playing adventure game Hero-U: Rogue to Redemption began, the game designers, Quest for Glory creators Lori and Corey Cole, mentioned stretch goals, but not what they were. Now, in their latest update, they’ve finally revealed the first one: at $500,000 (USD), the Hero-U team will 'add more art and content to the game' and give players a baby Meep companion. First seen in the original Quest for Glory, the Coles describe Meeps as creatures resembling 'Tribbles with legs, eyes, and very sharp teeth.'" (Hero-U: Rogue to Redemption, PC)

Credit url: kickstarter.com
Donnieboi  +   837d ago
What happens if they don't make the game? Do u get your money back? Stupid people keep giving their money to these kickstarters yet there's no evidence that they really will make the game or honor their debts. Why don't they ask a bank instead? Because they know the bank can legally enforce payment, but a foolish civilian cannot.
CoreyCole  +   836d ago
That's a valid question, but the answer is not as simple as you think. When you support a Kickstarter campaign, you are giving a vote of confidence to the developers. That's why you choose people you trust. Most of our supporters got value from our Quest for Glory and other games, and want to see us succeed.

Could we have gone to a bank for funding? The short answer is "No." Banks are extremely conservative; they will lend money to companies that are already successful and want to expand. They won't lend to a new, small company.

The second answer is that our Kickstarter project is not just for funding. It publicizes our game project and ensures us that there is interest. Most of the people supporting our project are committing $20. Lori and I are committing a year of our lives at a pay rate that is a fraction of what we would make working for a big company.

Who is stupid? The backers or us? By backing this project, they are getting our promise that we will make a game they will love, and that it will be a type of game they would not see any other way.

Is their faith in us less valid than the faith you put into a new game when you spend $50 to buy it, not knowing whether it will be a good game or not? I'd say the latter is a bigger leap of faith, knowing how many bad games have come out with a lot of hype, and knowing that *every* game Lori and I have ever made has been critically acclaimed.

Backing a Kickstarter project you believe in is a tiny expense and a big vote of belief in the integrity of the project's creators. If you think it's "stupid", well, I guess you're happy with accepting the choices made for you by the big game publishers. You don't want your own vote to count.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
30°

Dynasty Warriors 8 Empires Visual Analysis: PS4 Trumps Xbox One With Better AA And Image Quality

11m ago - Dynasty Warriors 8: Empires on the Xbox One is an extremely disappointing port. | PS4
20°

Tokyo Twilight Ghost Hunters - review - Just Push Start

18m ago - Kai Powell writes "Tokyo Twilight Ghost Hunters is a new role-playing game from the relatively ne... | PS3
20°

Total War: Attila Review | spong

23m ago - spong writes: Attila is a worthy addition to the venerable Total War series. It has improved u... | PC
20°

The Order: 1886 Review | spong

23m ago - spong writes: As for Ready at Dawn’s goals for this game, it achieves them, but when they’ve s... | PS4
Ad

Visit CGMagazine: The Culture of Games

Now - CGM is for the mature audience of comics and games that wants more out of their media than just a review score. | Promoted post
30°

Five Things I Want From The Order: 1887

24m ago - Richard Bailey Jr. of The Koalition writes: Last month, Sony released what is already one of the... | PS4