How to Make MoH Better; an Open Letter to Danger Close

Sticky Trigger writes; "Now I often believe that when it comes to criticism, regardless of the medium, that if you complain you had better have a suggestion of a way of fixing things. There are people who will bitch and moan for weeks on end without actually having a solution or a way to try and adjust things to make it better. The complaining stops here and the fixing starts now. Here are five things Danger Close/EA Games could and should do to make the next Medal of Honor game work."

[urwifeminder]

I think they did ok its the first multiplayer they done in house.

[GreenRanger_]

Just don't make it a COD clone.

[Army_of_Darkness]

It's always gonna be under COD's shadows, unless...
They make their next MOH game 60fps! people seem to accept that more over better graphics;-)

[jjank11]

SP is not bad but the MP is where this game has all sorts of shortcomings. They tried to compete with the COD (and to some extent the HALO market) and failed, maybe they should have focused on creating a more polished game, especially the MP portion of the game. If there is one thing that COD does well is that it is a polished game and runs very smooth and the developers are usually very attentive to fixing issues, or at least receptive to the fans. EA/DICE/Danger Close have been horrible so far with MOHW.

From VOIP issues to lag/hit detection

[Kaneda]

I love the teamwork system they came up with..

[venom06]

the ONLY way CoD fanboy review sites (IGN, KOTAKU) will give MoH good reviews is if they slap CoD on the front of the box...