“Call of Duty: Black Ops Declassified” is just one day away from launch. So where are the reviews for the Playstation Vita exclusive title? Greg Miller of IGN today revealed why his website has not yet review the first-person shooter in addition to urging gamers to “proceed with caution.”
90°
10°
20°
30°
40°
Ad 
40°
considering the people who have played it saying while it's $10 more then what it should be but still a decent game says you're wrong.
He crapped all over LBP Karting....go read the review and pretend that it's a review of Mario Kart 7. You could almost forget it wasn't a review for MK7. He complains about the EXACT things present in MK7 and somehow comes to a 5/10.
If IGN never reviews it, nothing will be lost but a heavily bias review.
I didn't know Walter Jr. was also mentally handicapped.
That's such a messed up train wreck of mixed metaphors, it's almost genius!
it will have generic graphics, with subpar controls, and a bland storyline
MP will be very very basic and boring
I still have lumines, wipeout, uncharted, lbp. I sold resistance about a week after owning it, simply horrible.
It wasn't horrible at all, yes the multiplayer was and still is broken (though is good when it occasionally works) but the game looked good, handled very well and had a pretty decent story. It in no way at all deserved the damning reviews it got.
They only accept if you say it was underrated and was better than the reviews said, even though the game was garbage 100%.
I thouhgt that game was COMPLETE garbage from the demo I played. Im just saying there are better looking and playing FPS on N64 and PS1.
Im a huge SP FPS fan and trust me, you are correct that resistance VITA was complete and utter garbage. Of course sony fanboys gonna pretend it some misunderstood bashed game, but the reality is its crap and then they even say "well the multiplayer still doesnt work but the 4 hour souless campaign was worth it since it says 'only on playstation on the box.'"
I thought the game looked really bad and had poor gameplay, horrible animations and sound, non existent AI and pretty much everything except the textures was horrible from what I played of the demo.
He says the reason BLOPS 2 is delayed is because they're being shipped together.
Ergo, the reason BLOPS isn't getting to him until tomorrow is because of Declassified...and the reason Declassified isn't getting there until tomorrow is because it sucks!
lolol had to do it, it's just so funny seeing Sony fans defending Call of Duty!
Hip Hop Gamers perfected this and his house is full of free swag and games :)
It's pretty a must-buy for any Vita owner who's remotely interested in CoD, first person shooters or looking for a decent MP shooter in general for their system. :)
BIG difference.
Also this article didnt really say why there was no reviews did it? also why no news like ever? its out tomorrow and theres nothing. EA did the same thing with NFS but it turned out perfect. i just became most wanted today and its a great game. we shall see IGN
Vita owners are some of the most defensive around...giving games they expect to save the system low scores is not likely to endear IGN to them. Everyone else doesn't give a crap either way.
Declassified is not what the Vita needs. The Vita needs a new FPS IP that is it's own game instead of a stripped down version of the main game...something that utilises the Vita's features to the fullest and doesn't remind people that a better experience is available on their PS3 or 360.
Not saying IGN's reviews are good or not - don't read them - but numerous Vita games have been getting mediocre reviews from a wide variety of sites. They can't all be wrong. Could it be that some Vita games are just - GASP! - not that good, and owners are kidding themselves due to the lack of quality titles available?
The Vita needs new games you can get nowhere else, not shovelware.
*buyer's remorse... buyer's remorse*
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
You got it all wrong, the general consensus is you bought a phone that can't make calls just to play subpar games on and others are wondering why you didn't just go the cell phone / console route.
I have the Vita version on me and I played the tutorial. Can't say much yet, but it does look better than the first trailer but not by much.
N4G, home of hypocrisy.
the online is actually surprisingly fun. graphics has been upgraded by quite a margin from the last trailer shown. cant say it is very good looking. but decent. definitely better than Resistance for Vita. Kinda surprise that the game actually still have the COD feel intact, especially the online portion. Single player is just ok I would say. Anyway as the dev ever mentioned, online is where the game actually shine. which i have to agree. despite 4v4, with the rescaled map, you hardly felt its an issue. have not try the hostile mode yet, so no comment for that. OVerall decent. Especially I aint comparing it to the big brother BO2. They cant be compared. No that it's not up to standard. But just unfair to compare the 2 being different scale. For a handheld FPS. Pretty good experience. Probably the best FPS handheld experience at the moment.
For what I have tried so far, I personally give it a 7.5/10
I bet that the campaign won't be even near as "epic"(cinematic) as the the 1st "Modern" CoD.
It's pretty sad that Modern Combat 3 looks better.
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
for 5 dollars!
Oh and 12 People MP!
I do have some sympathy for BO:D though as it is the first CoD for VITA.. and MC3:Fallen Nation is probably the 4th iteration for the Apple devices.
No review copy's are ok with me most reviewers have already reviewed videos of incomplete gameplay **cough** ign... Just to down it from the start. I hope it's great, if so a lot of haters owe nilg an apology.
Too many people are hung up on 7.0 being the starting point for a good game at IGN.
The sad reality is that if we buy games that aren't the best they can be just to show the middle finger to reviewers we don't like, we're actually just giving that finger back to ourselves by financing sub par work.
If COD Vita (hardware limitations aside) doesn't stand toe to toe with its bigger brother then we shouldn't just accept it.
Initial previews were very poor but subsequent reports have mentioned a lot of positive reaction to newer builds.
Nevertheless "proceed with caution" doesn't mean much, it is not the same as "stay away" or "run in the opposite direction".
We'll find out if COD Vita is a headshot or a misfire soon.
This game is awesome, it has some funky glitches but it holds true to the name, although it only runs at 30fps it still feels like a call of duty game.
The people i was playing with online also feel the same.
This game is what Burning Skies shouldve been.
I personally give it a 8/10
But, as we know, the Vita haters (IGN) will tear it to pieces, which is a shame.
as previously said I still give the game 7.5 / 10. Definitely not a bad game like some who probably dont even have own Vita and try to act like they have the game calling it bad.
I would give this higher than 7.5 / 10 if the SP mission are good. I some how felt that it is the weakest thing in this game. I personally felt Hostiles mode seems better than the SP mission. Also the sound from those bullet shell sounds a little annoying after some time. Could have include more Maps for online rather than just 6. Althou they do have a few different modes to play with. Also if the Hostiles mode actually have co op capability. If all those are in place, I would be glad to give this at least a 8.5 or 9 / 10.
Can't say this is a must buy game for Vita. But those who want a decent FPS on handheld. This is it. Also I am kinda enjoying it when lying down and play it in my bed. :)