Pressfire writes: "We reviewers often have an urge to point out just how unoriginal military shooters have become."
and so it begins...
harde time understanding the translated text, but from what I can make out: mostly positive about the game, liking the shooting and the story. complaints center on losing control in cinematic moments , and on the linearity of the game
this is THE best review I seen so far! http://www.youtube.com/watc...
My eyes, and ears are bleeding! It's still more credible than a real IGN review! ;-)
Why bother reviewing it? Millions will be sold regardless.
Where are the other reviews, I've been waiting a while for these blak-ops 2 ones to roll out.
I agree with you on this one.The reviews arent going to stop this game from selling millions.Its pretty bad when one game can make so much money but we cant solve world hunger ect.Who would of figured.
Here's an idea. Get off N4G and anything gaming related and YOU start the biggest movement for world hunger instead of complaining about it.
Cosmit I was being sarcastic idiot but oh yeah I forgot N4G is full of mindless kids who really have no clue about humour and games.
Fake review. 4/6 seriously no one reviews out of 6 it's out of either /5 or /10.
their are a few sites that do
some websites score on a scale of 6. it's an odd scale, but it's real.
Some parts of Europe use it. Don't worry guys he's just trolling.
Well ill wait for the big sites to review the game. 4/6 is just odd as hell. Kinda like Halo 4 got super low review on some no name sites and IGN gives it a 9.8. Some sites give low reviews just to draw traffic and its bs.
So big sites means more credibility?
@RIPSKATEDESTROY In some cases yea. The small site like I said sometime wants hits and will do anything to get them.
I don't know. While I agree that some small sites are just trying to get hits, the same can be said about big sites. They all want hits to pay the bills.
This isn't a no name site in Norway...
Yeah its weird right? Just like the yankees and brits not using the metric system.
Needs to be 3/6
You played it? Or are you just trolling?
I got it early and I played it, not impressed at all. Sucks like every other COD game since MW2.
Thank you Google, for translating the page
Weird scoring system...
Stupid metric system and their 6 point review scale
The score is in metres, so out of a possible 19.7 metres this game scored a whopping 13! That's great.
Seriously nobody plays cod/bf series for the singleplayer. It's mp or zombies or both:)
Bad Co 2 had a good campaign, the MP was great and the onslaught mode was OK for it's time.
Got the game early, did a speed run of the campaign. My opinion the story is stupid and so non-sensical. The COD story has been bad since MW2 but in this game its way over the top. easily the worst story in the series. Tries to be smart ends up being stupid. so stupid its actually pretty comical.
You've explained absolutely nothing about the game story at all....
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.