170°
Submitted by GraveLord 685d ago | news

Microsoft applies for pay-per-viewer patent

Proposed tech would let consoles control how many people could watch each movie, or enforce age restrictions (Microsoft, Xbox 360)

GraveLord  +   685d ago
"Originally filed in April 2011, the application describes a system where cameras on a TV, cell phone, or other display identify how many people are watching content on screen, and check to make sure that the user's license for that content covers that many viewers. If it doesn't, the game or movie in question could be halted and the user prompted to purchase more licenses before resuming. "

Not good....
StrongMan  +   685d ago
That sounds like something MS would do, yet their faithfuls will defend it.
darthv72  +   685d ago
not just MS
Im sure every other company would want to make sure they are getting compensated accordingly. This would be no different than buying tickets to a movie. You buy 3 then 3 people can watch.

The ironic part is MS isnt really a content provider. All of their contracted affiliates are. sony on the other hand IS a content provider and would most likely be on the same side as MS in this situation.

by content provider i mean they actually develop and produce movies and tv shows. Not just a service to deliver them.
ItsTrue  +   685d ago
I'm not going to defend that!
HammadTheBeast  +   685d ago
No it's a great idea. This way people that come to my house can't leach off me. /Sarcasm Overload.
Muffins1223  +   684d ago
Did you buy the ps3 on launch day?Cause if you did they ripped you off
-Mika-  +   685d ago
It just an idea. It doesn't mean they're going to actually implement it. Stop being so negative.
vitullo31  +   685d ago
The idea is preposterous
dedicatedtogamers  +   685d ago
This, in conjunction with Microsoft's recent ban of player-made "paid" content (in the form of videos) does not bode well for the Microsoft faithful. Then again, the "Microsoft faithful" usually only stay faithful for about 10 years or less until they jump onto another platform (I've seen it time and time again on PC).

I very much doubt they would implement it. HOWEVER, it would allow Microsoft to begin bargaining with movie studios (many of which are owned by Sony).

Think of it this way:

"Hey Universal, how about putting your movies exclusively on our Live streaming service?"

"Uh, no way, Microsoft"

"Why not?"

"There's too much money to be made on other platforms"

"Okay, Universal, but how about THIS? How about we charge for a movie stream PER VIEWER?"

"Per VIEWER? That sounds incredible. How could you do that?"

*Cue Kinect camera*
dedicatedtogamers  +   685d ago
If you really think about it, Microsoft already does this with games: Xbox Live accounts. If you're at your friend's house and he has a 360 and a paid Gold account, you still have to log in with your own paid Gold account if you both want to jump online, even if it's on the same console. Am I wrong?
eferreira  +   685d ago
yup basically if you buy a new game and do not have live gold. You only get half the game (assuming there is multiplayer) but yet everyone poops on capcom for disc dlc.
mcstorm  +   685d ago
No you can log in as a guest under that user.
dedicatedtogamers  +   685d ago
@ Mcstorm

Thanks. I didn't know that. I remember having to log in on a buddy's Live account to play with another buddy online on the same console, but maybe he just wanted the Achievements or something (?)
adorie  +   685d ago
"better with kinect"
Lol.
Snookies12  +   685d ago
That is the most garbage thing I've ever heard... I know it probably won't be used, but if it ever is, I will never support a console/phone/whatever with this tech.
Godmars290  +   685d ago
Sounds like something like this would make Kinect required.
Blankman85  +   685d ago
Loooooool! Microsoft, whatever weed you're smoking, you need to get off of. Fast.
They are crazy! My living room is not a theatre, I'm not about to pay per person watching for jack!
Lol can you imagine watching a movie, its getting really intense and someone walks in and the darn thing refuses to continue? Better yet, hiding people behind your couch and they have to watch from beyond the camera's scope cause you only paid for 1. Lol. Fail Microsoft. Epic proportions fail.
Hicken  +   684d ago
I'm amazed you're not supporting this, frankly. This is the first time I've seen you say something MS was doing(or thinking of doing, in this case) was stupid.

And it IS stupid.
BitbyDeath  +   685d ago
Good thing Microsoft don't make TV's.
This sounds like the worst idea ever.
Pillsbury1  +   685d ago
And micr0$0ft finds even more ways to rape you of cash. First pay to play online now pay and watch gallery.
TemplarDante  +   685d ago
and if If they refuse to pay?, lets guess..
Skynet becomes self aware and kills them..
GreenRanger  +   685d ago
Does Kinect see..uh...certain inanimate objects as people?
Uh...my friend wants to know.

Related image(s)
Zha1tan  +   685d ago
Getting further away from the games as usual MS?
Rashonality  +   685d ago
HAH, good luck with that, people will find a way around it, or more simply go with free/indie stuff that are raising in quality...
doogiebear  +   684d ago
Or just go with Sony/Nintendo
Somebody  +   685d ago
So now that Windows 8 is uniting the next X Box, Surface, Windows PCs and Windows phones....things just gets better and better doesn't it?

This is what Windows 7 supporters are afraid of, not just about some pastel tiles on the desktop or the lack of a Start menu upon startup. It's the direction of MS is heading with these devices. Yes I know there are Win 8 supporters out saying there's no problem with menu and they are right but it's the stuff that we don't know that's bothering the naysayers. MS don't just unite several media platforms together without something to ensure it will have total control, starting with a completely MS controlled closed garden.

It's like the Rebels not knowing that there's a second Death Star being built as they celebrate the the destruction of the first one. You see things are better but you have tingle deep at the back of your mind telling you something is not right...
whoyouwit04  +   684d ago
Now this is facking ridiculous if Microsoft do this then they need to go out of business and this is coming from a die hard xbox fan but enough is enough. this is just plain ignorant and greedy. now if they use it for age restriction only then that will be fine.
#12 (Edited 684d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
DigitalRaptor  +   684d ago
The fact that this patent even exists proves that Microsoft would go ahead with it, IF THEY COULD. We all know how they operate as a business, and that is to the greater profit.

Ridiculous proposal.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
30°

5 Games That Will Genuinely Make You Cry

1h ago - CCC Says: "I have been playing Professor Layton vs. Phoenix Wright and Danganronpa 2 lately, and... | Culture
20°

CCG Review: Lethal League

1h ago - GuG Writer, Ryan Thompson does a review of Lethal League for the PC. | PC
20°

Casual Monday: Game Dev Story

1h ago - Hardcore Gamer: Game Dev Story by Kairosoft Co. is a fun mobile game where you create and manage... | Mobile
30°

The Gears Game That Never Was

1h ago - Readers Gambit has a brief look at the gears game that never quite came to fruition. | Xbox 360
Ad

Celebrate the new TV season with Filmwatch

Now - With the 2014-2015 TV season right around the corner, come join us on Filmwatch as we celebrate and give all you TV lovers something to enjoy! | Promoted post
30°

10 Times Just Not Giving A F**K Gave Us Great Video Games

1h ago - WC: By all means, celebrate Gone Home for it’s deep storytelling and innovative design. At the sa... | Culture