610°
Submitted by OllieBoy 687d ago | review

Halo 4 Review | QuarterToThree

Tom Chick writes: This is Halo 4. A shiny old dog without any new tricks. I got more out of the Halo 1 remake, which at least had the appeal of nostalgia. Playing through an updated version of the original Halo was at times tired or tedious. But it was also a reminder of the raw genius that launched the series. There is none of that in Halo 4, which is a drawn-out retread without any fresh perspective or energy, and furthermore missing a lot of what I need to pull me through a Halo game. Halo 4 demonstrates that if there’s one thing worse than more of the same, it’s less of the same. (Halo 4, Xbox 360) 1/5

« 1 2 3 »
Snookies12  +   687d ago
Wow, total trolling here? That's all I can figure for this, even if you didn't like the game, you have to admit it looks amazing and seems to play very well too (from what I've seen). A score like this is for broken and awful games... -_-
#1 (Edited 687d ago ) | Agree(90) | Disagree(29) | Report | Reply
Nimblest-Assassin  +   687d ago | Helpful
Im going to put Tom Chicks reviews into perspective

Uncharted 3- 2/5
Assassins Creed revelations: 1.5/5
Max Payne 3- 2/5
Journey- 2/5
Catherine- 2/5

Yeah this is normal for him... a reviewer who thinks he is better than everyone else

Example here: http://www.quartertothree.c...

Even though I love the parody... Tom Chick obviously insults IGN claiming they have no integrity, yet he is the one pulling stuff like this
Brace yourselves, since his half-assed site is on metacritic... for all out anarchy against him

http://www.metacritic.com/g...

It has begun
#1.1 (Edited 687d ago ) | Agree(92) | Disagree(8) | Report | Reply
NeXXXuS  +   687d ago
I bet he doesn't even play video games. He probably just watches people play on youtube.
QuantumWake  +   687d ago
Wow, you're not kidding about Metacritic. Not that it matters to some, but Halo 4 just dropped to an 88.

Oh boy, we got a storm coming.
Nimblest-Assassin  +   687d ago
My biggest problem with him is he thinks he is the best reviewer out there.... and everyones opinion except his is wrong

If a game is narrative focused... it usually gets a 1-2 from him

I have no idea why he still reviews videogames, when over 90% of his reviews are scores from 1-3

The rare moments when a game gets a 5/5 is mind boggling
Snookies12  +   687d ago
That's messed up... This dude is a joke (or at least he's making himself look like one). It's also just another reason why Metacritic is flawed. If they have people like this who are allowed to contribute reviews that aren't even anywhere near what they should be.
#1.1.4 (Edited 687d ago ) | Agree(19) | Disagree(3) | Report
otherZinc  +   687d ago
@Nimblest-Assassin,
Thanks, now metacritic is some BS for having a useless Clown like this to pull scores down for games he doesn't play.
#1.1.5 (Edited 687d ago ) | Agree(21) | Disagree(9) | Report
Blastoise  +   687d ago
This ain't gonna go down well...

By the way, whilst I don't agree with the score at all, people should stop focusing so much on Metacritic scores. If I only focused on games with high Metacritic numbers I would have missed out on a lot of great games this GEN.
Reviews in general are not to be trusted like they once were. Just saying...
#1.1.6 (Edited 687d ago ) | Agree(20) | Disagree(2) | Report
The_Infected  +   687d ago
What a idiot 1/5 seriously I'd rate his review 0/5. Does this shit go on Metacritic? If so this review pisses me off.
StreetsofRage  +   687d ago
LOL. I can guarantee you that real gamers don't care about metacritic. Especially fans of the Halo franchise.

The problem with the internet and metacritic is that anybody with a couple of pennies can create a site and make crap reviews. Their are fanboy sites that give perfect scores or crap scores just to move the average.

I personally only read Game Informer and IGN. Their reviews are usually pretty solid. Respectable mags and sites have all praised this game.

Halo 4 is a AAA title. Some random no name site trying to bring the averages down isn't going to change that. Stop using Metacritic. It carries no weight.

Their has been a huge amount of hardcore MLG Halo players that been playing Halo competitively since part 1 and they have called this Halo the best ever. That's the only review that matters to me.
#1.1.8 (Edited 687d ago ) | Agree(14) | Disagree(15) | Report
BattleAxe   687d ago | Trolling | show
StanLee  +   687d ago
It's rare that you read a review with such vitriol. The writer clearly is more in love with the perceived weight of his opinion than giving a subjective review. What we have here is a pretentious twat with a platform he shouldn't have!
Outside_ofthe_Box  +   687d ago
Yeah, I remember this dude from when he gave Journey a 2/5. He isn't a gamer plain and simple.
Sargerus  +   687d ago
He also gave Fallout New Vegas a F
http://www.gameroni.com/pos...

a C for Dead Space 2:
http://www.gameroni.com/pos...

And a B for... Black Ops:
http://www.gameroni.com/pos...
#1.1.12 (Edited 687d ago ) | Agree(12) | Disagree(2) | Report
JokesOnYou  +   687d ago
Who cares about metacritic, one look at all the video reviews for Halo4 from the bigname sites like IGN its easy to see the quality for yourself, the gameplay is silky smooth with the usual Halo finesse, tough enemies with top notch AI, the weapons are varied with kickass sound, the story is easily the best in any FPS, the graphics are amazing, this is game of the year folks. I never heard of this site, why should any Halo fan care about what Halo-haters like this guy thinks, I usually dont mind a negative or different opinion but he clearly has no creditability.....don't worry the game will sell a shiiii ton and best of all we'll be enjoying Halo4 for the next year+, while this fool waits for his next cheap payday pretending to be a game journalist blogging from his Moms basement like a vulture looking for hits/$.

The Chief is back!
#1.1.13 (Edited 687d ago ) | Agree(15) | Disagree(15) | Report
bobtheimpaler  +   687d ago
Wow. Makes you wonder what games this reviewer actually enjoys playing.

Just seems like the dude is wasting his time doing something he doesn't like.
PtRoLLFacE  +   687d ago
don't worry, i already called chuck Norris to put a grenade up this guy arse! i was going to pay him but he said he ll do it for free, he ll probably use his suit costume and use his nick name "master chief" to make it look like an accident ;) by the way no one saw anything, if you talk, he ll come for you, good day.
zeroskie  +   687d ago
@JokesOnYou. Yeah we'd all like to ignore Metacritic, but the scores on that site directly affect how much the developers get paid by the publishers, etc... It's bullshit I know but guys like Tom Chicks like to trolling isn't totally harmless.
legoman864  +   687d ago
Wow, looking at all those scores; he probably doesn't like playing video games at all. Maybe he should pick another hobby.
papashango  +   687d ago
you know... The reason hhg was banned from n4g is because of his sensationalist Ways. This is not any different. if enough people report this this guys site regularly we can keep the gaming news free from fishing for hits review trolls.
GoldenGamer  +   687d ago
While not many gamers adhere to the scores on Metacritic, I seem to remember the developers of Fallout: New Vegas receiving a fine from Bethesda because their game didn't reach a certain score on Metacritic.

So while reviews in themselves are not important, the consequences of them are.
Perjoss  +   687d ago
Thanks for the summary Nimblest.

I assume he does this for attention and it seems to work perfectly? correct me if I'm wrong but isn't this the most commented Halo4 'review' news article on N4G?

In the end if he didn't like it then nobody can say he's wrong as your own opinion is just that. does anyone know of any games he has given perfect scores to? just out of curiosity, just to see what his taste is.
Sony360  +   687d ago
Why do turds like this ever wind up on metacritic?
geddesmond  +   687d ago
To be quite honest though. None of those games he reviewed that you mentioned hold any sort of ground after the hype went away.

Uncharted 2 deserved the 9s and 10s it got because that game really was awesome. Uncharted 3 didn't have the same on the edge of your seat type of story and it had a few problems on release like the aiming dead zone issue which made it pure luck if you got head shots with ease. Its not a 2/5 but it dam sure ain't a 5/5 game. If UC2 gots 10s and its better than UC3 then should UC3 get those 10s too just because it has the Uncharted name?

The same with those other games mentioned. Catherine was unique but it had many issues. AC Revelations was just more of the same but the worst story in the series. Max Payne 3 SMH, I traded it in after a week.

What I'm trying to say is although the very low scores this reviewer gives are unbelievable. None of those games are jaw dropping 9s or 10s and I say this as an Uncharted fan.

Just because you love a series, it does not mean you have turn a blind eye to some of the issues in that series. You just have to hope and pray in the next installment the devs take those criticisms into account and try bring some new innovations to play around with.

People need to take off those fanboy glasses because its making their vision blury. Ask yourselves truthfully inside when you play a game. Is this game really what its made out to be? and if you answer yourself yes then who cares what others have to say about it. You got your enjoyment and moneys worth out of it and thats all that matters.
rjdofu  +   687d ago
And don't forget Zen pinball 3D guys, 10/10 from Mr Tom Chick.
profgerbik  +   687d ago
IGN reviews was honestly no better than his just the complete opposite.

One guys rated it really low after playing it, IGN rated it really high before they even played the damn game.

Which is worse who cares, not me but I know Halo 4 is not amazing as everyone thinks. If you love CoD you probably love this easy FPS.

I have watched countless videos to try and persuade myself otherwise but every time I feel like it looks like the exact same Halo as forever and it even plays slower if that is even possible.

The characters just move so slow and just like in CoD all you see is people running around spraying and praying or in Halo's case spamming melee every time something is close and not only that managing to kill a full armored person in couple melee hits never made sense...

The game looks far too easy and this is becoming a trend lately with games, they become easier and easier just like CoD has.

I am tired of all these dumbed down FPS like CoD, Tribes, Planetside and Halo, I just am.. let the down votes come.. All those games used to be challenging and it shouldn't be acceptable that they have become far easier over the years.

Halo 4 sure it looks great but it's game play seems to be severely lacking with how slow it is and the whole melee thing I have always thought was dumb is still there just as easy to use as before.

I just look at games like Half Life 2: Deathmatch or the first Tribes, games that took some real skill to play and the players moved at incredible speeds, making it extremely challenging to ever get a head shot or even hit them for that matter.

Now Half Life doesn't even exist practically anymore, Valve trashed it for Portal is what it seems.. and look at what the new Tribes has become.. another dumbed down game.

The new Tribes just like most other FPS these days had to cater to the noobs by making the game slower than it used to be and removing a lot of the functions that made the game even more difficult to play like the grappling hook.

I am just sick and tired of this pathetic trend, developers though are so scared these days because they all are hanging on by a thread I completely understand why they do it but still it blows.

I ain't saying I agree with this dude or even IGN for that matter, I just wanted to give my own personal opinion on FPS now a days and what I have actually seen of Halo 4 other than graphics has not be impressive at all.
#1.1.24 (Edited 687d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(3) | Report
x5exotic  +   687d ago
LOL SO MUCH BUTTHURT
He sounds like a great reviewer
Capt-FuzzyPants  +   686d ago
At least he's consistent. Maybe he just reviews in different standards. I don't think when reviewers find negatives they should still give it a 10. If they find a negative they should take some points off for it because there are undeniably some games that get 10s that are better than another game with a 10.
colonel179  +   687d ago
He writes reviews like that because he could never get past the fact that his mommy never got a Nintendo for Christmas.

What kind of games does he like? Angry Birds? Hannah Montana?
the pro gamer   687d ago | Spam
rayan007   687d ago | Spam
OldParr  +   687d ago
he stated his opinion and claimed that the game sucks. I just hope that I don't see him online bitching about it and giving a hard time for those that do really like the game.
miDnIghtEr20C_SfF  +   687d ago
Never heard of this website until now. Why do they give so many 100's to games and give Halo a 1? That's weird.

No name websites get to go on metacritic now? Crazy!
Syntax-Error  +   687d ago
Bottom of the screen
Just look at the related stories at the bottom of the screen and you will see this guy is just being an asshole
LUCKYXS7LEVEN  +   687d ago
wow this review gave me cancer, made me go to the jedi side with no cookies, made me make love to honey boo boo's mom, made me a beibeliver, and made me like all of uwe bowl movies
Monstar  +   686d ago
That's all you can figure out? It might have nothing to do with the fact that he just doesn't like Halo 4 and doesn't approve of it's slow evolution process? Not everyone in the world can love one game, nor can they be considered trolls or haters if they think the game hasn't progressed enough with new and fresh ideas. Which IMO it hasn't. Halo 4 still feels TOO much like previous Halo's and for some, it's enough to dislike it. Your forcing your opinion on his (and u haven't even played the game) and disagree with the review because it doesn't match yours and feel because he is in the minority, he is somehow wrong..ditch that primitive mentality and Get over yourself.
dedicatedtogamers  +   687d ago
Attention whores, unite!

Even if you've moved past the Halo series on to other franchises, anyone with eyes can see that the game is at LEAST a 4/5 in terms of overall quality and polish.
bubblebeam  +   687d ago
Agreed. I'm happy to see that the N4G community, whether PS3, 360, PC or Nintendo oriented can all agree (mostly) that this is a bullcrap review. A 2/10 means your game is broken and practically unplayable.

Kudos to the N4G community. Flag this site down, so we don't have to see this come next year with other big games (Bioshock, God Of War, Gears Of War, Beyond:2S. etc).
Monstar  +   686d ago
Different reviews with different numbered conclusions. Graphics and polish doesn't mean what it use to for some. A review can easily lower the score greatly due to gameplay a lone, because in the end...that's what makes or breaks a game and according to this reviewers opinion, the game feels too dated or too similar....simple!
aviator189  +   687d ago
Eh, I'm not even going to bother saying anything here.
My energy's all used up with that EGM review.
Old McGroin  +   687d ago
Ha! My exact thoughts.
iNFAMOUZ1  +   686d ago
and the fanboys stil disagree with every positive comment LOL
TrevorPhillips  +   687d ago
I'm just going to enjoy the game when I pick it up tonight at midnight launch! I love Halo :)
Sargerus  +   687d ago
who the hell is Tom Chick?
Nimblest-Assassin  +   687d ago
That guy who gave uncharted 3 a 4 out of 10, and thinks he is better than everyone else
#5.1 (Edited 687d ago ) | Agree(23) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
HammadTheBeast  +   687d ago
And Journey 2/5 for trying too hard to be different.
Mkai28  +   687d ago
I was wondering the same thing, does that mean he is a transsexual?
Old McGroin  +   687d ago
Yes. Yes it does.
Jinkies  +   687d ago
I bet that 7/10 score isn't looking as bad now

THIS is a trolling review...
Convas  +   687d ago
That 7/10 is still just as bad because of it's CONTENTS.

For crying out loud, how is that not clicking with you people. If EGM had legitimate complaints to go with their score, there would be NOWHERE as much backlash.
#6.1 (Edited 687d ago ) | Agree(21) | Disagree(12) | Report | Reply
rayan007   687d ago | Spam
TekoIie  +   687d ago
"So what’s the point of the skulls that raise the difficulty level?"

You know when you ask and question and answer it at the same time?.... why do that?!?!?

Also most of the criticisms he had for Spartan Ops were also issue with firefight and yet he praises firefight everytime he mentions it.
#7 (Edited 687d ago ) | Agree(11) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
grayfoxx881  +   687d ago
I believe he was referring to the absence of a scoring system when skulls are activated for a level. He knew activated skulls changed the difficulty.
TekoIie  +   687d ago
He still would've ended up with the exact same answer....
grayfoxx881  +   687d ago
That doesn't even make any sense. Do yourself a favor and actually read the article or review before you comment on it. The point of that question was asking why skulls were included in Halo 4 if there was no scoring system attached to it. He didn't have an answer why.
Derek-Flint   687d ago | Spam
JANF  +   687d ago
begging for attention! please dont give this joke of a website hits.
PockyKing  +   687d ago
I couldn't of guessed, Tom Chick once again.
wwm0nkey  +   687d ago
What sucks is that this got put on metacritc, brought the score down because someone decided to be a troll.

I hope they don't work like Obsidian and get bonuses based off of metacritic....
#11 (Edited 687d ago ) | Agree(9) | Disagree(5) | Report | Reply
TheCrazyMerc  +   687d ago
Haha, I think this site is just trying to get views lmao!
shammgod  +   687d ago
Lol, reviews are just ridiculous anymore
JonnyBigBoss  +   687d ago
Another review where Tom Chick sticks to his opinion rather than letting outside forces influence his work.

Your score is not indicative of the quality of the title, or its entertainment value, but I wholeheartedly respect that you stick your neck out and say whether or not you think a game is recommendable.

Halo 4 appears to be a great game but not nearly as inspired as it should be.
#14 (Edited 687d ago ) | Agree(12) | Disagree(33) | Report | Reply
Knight_Crawler  +   687d ago
Hope you say the same thing when he gives MGS Ground Zero a 2.
palaeomerus  +   687d ago
Normally I'd agree with that, in theory, but Konami really has been doing some weirdly incompetent stuff lately. They seem to have developed some kind of corporate dementia where they can't do anything right include port old games into cheap HD collections that look and play better than their SD original. You have to wonder if that lack of quality maintenance might not eventually affect some of their AAA stuff too.

Not that Tom Chick has much credibility.

His reviews seem to be some sort of exercise in producing angry, artsy, fiat based, beatnik/counterculture-ish 'cult of personality' stunts rather than real reviews for readers who might buy the game.

He's more like Blackwell reviewing fashion in a best and worst dressed list for pure entertainment purposes than a serious critic focused on reviewing material for consumers of that material.
starchild  +   687d ago
Yeah, I'm sure the fact that you are a diehard PS3 fanboy has nothing to do with your opinion...

You guys are as much of a joke as this Chick guy is.
NastyLeftHook0  +   687d ago
its an opinion...DEAL WITH IT.
MAJ0R  +   687d ago
What if Tom Chick gave The Last of Us a 1/5, Would you just tell people to deal with it?
ado908  +   687d ago
Why would you guys assume JonnyBigBoss is a Ps3 fanboy? There was nothing fanboyism about his comment. My god I remember when people went ape shit for uncharted 3's reviews but this, this is just ridiculous. It's like people are forcing these reviewers to give a good score. And until one gives a bad one you people attack him. It's sad over a videogame...
Burning_Finger   687d ago | Trolling | show | Replies(1)
AO1JMM  +   687d ago
Why would Metacrtic use 2bit sites like that? So if I had a site (Bobsgaming.net) and posted a review would it be used on Metacritic? Is there any requirements to be a legit gaming review site?
#16 (Edited 687d ago ) | Agree(13) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
Parapraxis  +   687d ago
Don't forget to rate the site! The less hits asshats like these get the better.

BTW it doesn't matter if you are a hardcore PS3 fan, XBOX fan, PC fan, or own every gaming system on the planet, reviews like this are an embarrassment and give the entire industry less credibility.
#16.1 (Edited 687d ago ) | Agree(9) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
hardcorehippiez  +   687d ago
which is exactly what i said about reviews of medal of honor warfighter but guess what it is a good game and i suspect halo 4 is as well. journalism to me is dead. bunch of retards they are ruining gaming by pulling stunts like this .
Parapraxis  +   687d ago
I know everybody with half a brain is thinking it, so I'll say it for all of us.
*ahem*

F**k you, Tom Chick!
#17 (Edited 687d ago ) | Agree(14) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
bubblebeam  +   687d ago
I would also blame PC, Nintendo, Microsoft and Sony fanboys. This is happening to all exclusive games, as they generate the most heat and attention.

First Uncharted 3 now Halo 4, probably 2 of the best games this gen. If fanboys stopped bitching, people like Tom Chick would have no place.

How about we all stop blaming other people and take responsibility for our own words? At the end of the day, we are all gamers, and we aren't held in such high regard by non-gamers.

We put up with enough crap from people outside the gaming world, like psychologists, but it really hurts when it's people from within that are eating all of us alive. I know fanboys will always exist, which is sad.

I don't think I could stomach a review from Tom Chick on Beyond: Two Souls. That game looks original, but unfortunately it falls in the 'exclusive' territory.

Anyways, pay no attention to reviews like this. Who didn't get Uncharted 3 because of this drop of ball sweat? Who isn't getting Halo 4 because of this? I'm picking it up tonight when it launches. Tom Chick can suck on that.
TENTONGUN  +   687d ago
i feel ya. anyways this guys review has absolutly not affected me buying halo tomorrow. he just feeds into the biased dkheads that justify never playing halo, or are hardcore ps3 nintendo fans. kind of makes you want to slap him, but fk it. ill prolly just be playin halo next few days and quit reading these reviews over the course of the week. good times
#17.1.1 (Edited 687d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report
wwm0nkey  +   687d ago
From the Review:
"However, Halo's campaign co-op supports four players now. I think this is new. Did Reach support four players?"

Sites like this get on Metacritic..... :/
#18 (Edited 687d ago ) | Agree(29) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
Convas  +   687d ago
Are you kidding me? This asshat is seen as a credible industry source?

Gaming is doomed.
GrathiusXR  +   687d ago
I hope you're not trolling ? Because I can't find it in the review so unless you're lying then he could have edited the review after it was published.
aviator189  +   687d ago
He did edit it.
I read it and that statement was in there in the review, but now it's gone.

People are noticing on his website too.

Just another reason Metacritic shouldn't be taking approvals from a website like this.
#18.2.1 (Edited 687d ago ) | Agree(15) | Disagree(2) | Report
AusRogo  +   687d ago
Did he actually say that?( don't want to give him hits) what a f***ing joke. Love Halo, hell its one of the main reasons why I own my 360! This game looks amazing. Also, isn't this the same guy that gave Uncharted 3 (one of my favourite games this gen) a 4/10? So ya, Tom Chick review games properly pls.
Shepherd 214  +   687d ago
Halo has had 4 player coop since halo 3 in 2007. Old Tom is a few years and a few games behind.
bubblebeam  +   687d ago
"Old Tom is a few years and a few games behind."

Quite a few brain cells to boot it would seem.
MattyG  +   687d ago
Tom Chick is a disgrace of a reviewer. Seriously, Metacritic should not allow Quarter to Three's reviews to be on there anymore.
SolidDuck  +   687d ago
I've seen a few bad reviews for halo 4 now. Kinda surprising.
MasterD919  +   687d ago
You can tell when someone is trying to go out of their way for attention...with a score like this, it's quite clear what is going on here.
IWentBrokeForGaming  +   687d ago
Toms OPINION and he's entitled to it!

or is this where all gamers cry and whine foul, because his OPINION isn't in line with theirs!
wwm0nkey  +   687d ago
The guy gave Uncharted a 3/10, guy trolls fan bases for hits.
Death_Grin48  +   687d ago
We're also entitled to have opinions on his opinions, so what's your point?
IWentBrokeForGaming  +   687d ago
Gaming Politics are one of the many things killing the hobby is my point!
Knight_Crawler  +   687d ago
Max Payne 3 - 4/10
http://n4g.com/news/1005730...

Journey - 2/5
http://n4g.com/news/964003/...

http://n4g.com/news/967827/...

The guy is just craving attention.
IWentBrokeForGaming  +   687d ago
Many of the games he's scored low I've bought and I've thoroughly enjoyed!

and Im also now on the Halo 4 hype train and Im buying it on tuesday!
dcortz2027  +   687d ago
When you give any Uncharted game a 3/10, or Halo 4 a 1/5 then you don't even deserve to have an opinion lol. Just ignore this clown and enjoy Halo 4, that is what us Playstation fans always do haha.
Slysi  +   687d ago
Lucky your review means nothing to me.probably prefers sponge bob square pants games
marcmjm  +   687d ago
"In terms of new features, ODST had firefight, and Reach had even better firefight." Reach had even better firefight? You're kidding, right? Any Halo fan knows that's a big fat lie. This reviewer is obviously the ultimate troll who has clearly never even played a single Halo game before, at least not before even giving 4 a chance. Who the hell does this guy think he is?! Move along, folks. Nothing to see here.
Loki86  +   687d ago
How the hell did this fucking idiot get on metacritic. Getting this removed ASAP. What a complete and utter troll.
Ionvein  +   687d ago
This is what happens when a site is losing traffic and no one visits anymore. Throw up a half-assed review of a big title game and give it an unjustified score.
Acquiesc3  +   687d ago
All this raging is hilarious. ^^b
FanMan  +   687d ago
^^
plmkoh  +   687d ago
And people thought fanboys were just mad for at his UC3 score. Obviously, 'Tom Chick' either has bad taste in games or is a marketing guru trying to gather hits and propel his career.
Jek_Porkins  +   687d ago
I am all for people having interesting opinions, but a 1/5 should be reserved for a game that is broken, not a game that you just don't like.
jokia005  +   687d ago
some of reviewers should be reviewed,
ElementX  +   687d ago
Well you just click on the link under the "Read Full Review" link and vote WTF on the story and No on "like this site?"
Mathew9R   687d ago | Spam
« 1 2 3 »

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
20°

Japanese students rank the Top 11 Video Game Companies

2m ago - Japanese website for students, MyNavi Student, has recently polled its readers on which Japan... | Industry
20°

The Ultimate Five Nights at Freddy's Guide

4m ago - Suzanne Verras writes: "Welcome to the Ultimate Five Nights at Freddy’s Guide! For as ultimate a... | PC
20°

Nintendo Leading a Double Life: Issues in N.A. and Success in Japan

4m ago - "Nintendo is leading a double life, and it has to be insanely frustrating for the executives. In... | Wii U

Verdun’s Surge to the Frontline

5m ago - Verdun has been surging forward as more than 85,000 players have played the World War One (WW1) F... | PC
Ad

Warriors Orochi 3 Ultimate (XB1) Review

Now - Ken mows down massive armies in the latest Musou game. | Promoted post
10°

Steam Discovery Update goes live

5m ago - As a long time user of Steam GamersFTW have often lamented that it needed an overhaul to make it... | PC
Related content from friends