Top
All Channels
60°
9.0

Game Guys review - Medal of Honor Warfighter

Imagine this: You are a Tier-One operative in the U.S. military taking part in a joint anti-Al Qaeda operation with the Philippian Army during a formidable typhoon. Actually, you don't have to image it at all, as that operation is one of the events in Danger Close's militaristic FPS game Medal of Honor Warfighter inspired by real-life events.

The story is too old to be commented.
TIER1xWOLFPACKx1368d ago

finally someone who actually understands the game for what it is

Nest88r1368d ago

Yeah!! Im actually loving this game!! Creepy reviewers dont get whats the game is all about

showtimefolks1368d ago

This game is atleast. 7.5/10 but most gaming sites were pissed that EA didn't send them copies a week ahead of time. Also most gaming sites reviewed the game without installing the day one arch

Ign's review is that MOH does nothing new well watch them give 9.5/10 to COD and it hasn't done anything new in years.

Double standard by gaming media

Tonester9251368d ago

lol at COD hasn't done anything new in Years part.

I think you're just trying to fit in with everyone else

Tonester9251368d ago

Let me restate it. Treyarch Innovates. Infinity Ward doesn't.

MOH was all graphics no gameplay and they paid the price.

Had everyone drooling over the graphics until the controller was in their hands. Now people want reviewers to give it a better score because of the "Amazing Graphics" haha GTFOH

TKCMuzzer1368d ago

Single player of MOHW>MW3, why? because it's believable and you feel part of it. MW3 was going through the motions, so much I could barely get through the campaign without being bored and as for MW3 multiplayer. YES, MOHW has issues with multiplayer but it also scrappes all that over powered weapons, stupid perks crap down to the point where it becomes about the player.
I'm all for bad reviews but these reviewers better review Black Ops 2 using the same methods. As we know though, this is never the case. Apparently COD makes a lot of money and that can filter many ways.

showtimefolks1368d ago

yeah keep believing COD has done something fresh in last 2 years, just keep thinking that

since MW1 its been the same game with different skin and summer blockbuster action moments as its single player story. and after making billions of dollars it is time to update the graphics engine nothing wrong with a game looking amazing

i don't like military FPS in general. i am not hating on COD my point is hold each military FPS to same standard, if one has nothing fresh than next in line should also be reviewed with that in mind

gaming media can be bought case and point kane and lynch with gamespot when they fired jeff

R6ex1368d ago

Yup.

IGN is pathetic!

How dare they give a lowly 4.5/10 score?!

MOH:W is a more beautiful game than most others. It also gives a realistic sense of playing the role of a Tier 1 operator. The action sequences are believable. Certainly not the ridiculously far-fetched COD ideas.

This game is at least a 7/10.

Majin-vegeta1368d ago

@Tonester925
*lol at COD hasn't done anything new in Years part.*

The only thing COD has done new in years is show how it basically holds your hand while you play.Apart from that nothing new.

OT:While the Multi still needs some work i say give a month or two to work out some of the kinks here and there and it will be good.

Remember BF3 how it was when it came out??Yea.