Top
110°
5.0

Killzone HD Review (Gamingvogue)

GV writes: A franchise that was supposed to have a rich lore with mountains of back story related to both the ISA and Helghast, and considering the fact that the latter are quite intriguing, Guerrilla’s insistence on making ISA the good guys is a bewildering decision.

Read Full Story >>
gamingvogue.com
The story is too old to be commented.
Masane1338d ago SpamShow
AusRogo1338d ago

This guys opinion sucks.

Knight_Crawler1338d ago (Edited 1338d ago )

LMFAO!

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻)

DeltaCanuckian1338d ago

So this guy's opinion is "this sucks, that sucks, everything sucks, game sucks". That's pretty much all I got out of that. Someone needs to practice writing reviews, regardless of whether they are opinion or not.

Ju1338d ago

LOL. This game get's reviewed with today's standard. This is released as a collectors item and a classic. Would be curious what some other classic PS2 game would score.

Blankman851338d ago

It's a new release is it not? Should be reviewed with today's standard of HD re-releases. If the original game was average then there isn't much a shiny new coat can help.

Capt-FuzzyPants1338d ago

Plus when it originally came out for the PS2 it didn't get great reviews right? It got decent reviews, but there were criticisms.

Bathyj1338d ago

Yeah, and most of those criticisms were that it wasnt good enough to kill Halo.

And then Part 2 was criticised for having a pre-rendered trailer.

And then 3 was criticised for not being like 2.

Games media have always had it in for this series so I'm not surprised. Still, it hasn't stopped me from enjoying them all.

Hicken1338d ago

You can stick the whole review in one n4g comment. Odds are: it's gonna suck(the review, that is), yet you defend it. You don't question the quality of the review; you don't directly address the review at ALL, which makes one wonder if you even READ it to get what people are talking about. (It's okay; we know you had no intention to do so, anyway.

The review is poorly written. Bad grammar, poor paragraph structure, and a lack of any real detail all point to this. It's unclear whether he understands what an HD remaster is, and gives off mixed signals as to whether or not he's played the original PS2 version.

"It's a new release is it not?"

When they "digitally remaster" a classic movie, do you hold it to the same standards as a movie originally made last year? If you do, there's something seriously wrong with you.

Let's be honest: you're only saying it because it's a game on PS3.

r211338d ago

Shortest review I've ever read and not really in depth :L Different strokes for different folks i guess.

Show all comments...
The story is too old to be commented.